IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4689-d793625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Managerial Compensation and Ability on the Relationship between Business Strategy and Firm Value: For Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

Author

Listed:
  • Won Park

    (Division of Business Administration, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea)

  • Chung-gyu Byun

    (Entrepreneurship Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52725, Korea)

Abstract

This study examines the effect of managerial ability and compensation on the relationship between business strategy and firm value for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Managers determine, plan, implement, and maintain a firm’s business strategy. Therefore, the characteristics of a manager are an important factor in the selection and success of a business strategy. We believe that managerial abilities are important factors in determining that success. If the managerial ability is good, the manager is more likely to implement a strategy suitable for the firm, significantly affecting the firm’s value. Managers are also more motivated to work harder if their compensation level is high. Therefore, the manager will make efforts to successfully lead the firm’s business strategy. In small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the role of managers is important for carrying out strategies due to the lack of internal resources and difficulties in external funding. Therefore, we examine whether managerial ability and compensation affect the relationship between business strategy and firm value for SMEs. The analysis period is from 2011 to 2017, and the analysis was based on 1615 (firm/year), due to some of the listed SMEs being non-financial businesses with a December settlement of accounts. As a result of the analysis, managerial compensation and ability demonstrated different effects depending on the type of strategy, in terms of the relationship between business strategy and firm value. We suggest that managerial ability and compensation affect the value of a firm and moderate the relationship between business strategy and firm value.

Suggested Citation

  • Won Park & Chung-gyu Byun, 2022. "Effect of Managerial Compensation and Ability on the Relationship between Business Strategy and Firm Value: For Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-32, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4689-:d:793625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4689/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4689/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desai, Mihir A. & Dharmapala, Dhammika, 2006. "Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 145-179, January.
    2. Nancy L. Rose & Andrea Shepard, 1997. "Firm Diversification and CEO Compensation: Managerial Ability or Executive Entrenchment?," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(3), pages 489-514, Autumn.
    3. C. Edward Fee, 2003. "Raids, Rewards, and Reputations in the Market for Managerial Talent," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 1315-1357.
    4. Matt Pinnuck & Kevin Stevenson, 2021. "Enhancing the Interface between Standard‐setters and Academic Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 169-185, September.
    5. Marvin B. Lieberman & Lieven Demeester, 1999. "Inventory Reduction and Productivity Growth: Linkages in the Japanese Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 466-485, April.
    6. Holthausen, Robert W. & Watts, Ross L., 2001. "The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 3-75, September.
    7. Peter Demerjian & Baruch Lev & Sarah McVay, 2012. "Quantifying Managerial Ability: A New Measure and Validity Tests," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(7), pages 1229-1248, July.
    8. Stein, Jeremy C, 1997. "Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 111-133, March.
    9. Govindarajan, V. & Gupta, Anil K., 1985. "Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-66, January.
    10. Chemmanur, Thomas J. & Paeglis, Imants, 2005. "Management quality, certification, and initial public offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 331-368, May.
    11. Jennifer Francis & Dhananjay Nanda & Per Olsson, 2008. "Voluntary Disclosure, Earnings Quality, and Cost of Capital," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 53-99, March.
    12. Jermias, Johnny, 2008. "The relative influence of competitive intensity and business strategy on the relationship between financial leverage and performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 71-86.
    13. Bok Baik & David B. Farber & Sam (Sunghan) Lee, 2011. "CEO Ability and Management Earnings Forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1645-1668, December.
    14. John R. Graham & Si Li & Jiaping Qiu, 2012. "Managerial Attributes and Executive Compensation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(1), pages 144-186.
    15. Kathleen A. Bentley & Thomas C. Omer & Nathan Y. Sharp, 2013. "Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 780-817, June.
    16. Marianne Bertrand & Antoinette Schoar, 2003. "Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1169-1208.
    17. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Lillis, Anne M., 1995. "The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 241-258, May.
    18. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    19. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 1997. "Quality strategy, strategic control systems, and organizational performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(3-4), pages 293-314.
    20. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2014_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Sherwin Rosen, 1982. "Authority, Control, and the Distribution of Earnings," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 311-323, Autumn.
    22. Rhee, Munsung & Mehra, Satish, 2006. "Aligning operations, marketing, and competitive strategies to enhance performance: An empirical test in the retail banking industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 505-515, October.
    23. Danielle Higgins & Thomas C. Omer & John D. Phillips, 2015. "The Influence of a Firm's Business Strategy on its Tax Aggressiveness," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 674-702, June.
    24. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    25. Bushman, Robert & Chen, Qi & Engel, Ellen & Smith, Abbie, 2004. "Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 167-201, June.
    26. Holthausen, Robert W. & Larcker, David F. & Sloan, Richard G., 1995. "Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 29-74, February.
    27. Jensen, Michael C & Murphy, Kevin J, 1990. "Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(2), pages 225-264, April.
    28. Schrand, Catherine M. & Zechman, Sarah L.C., 2012. "Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 311-329.
    29. Lambert, Ra & Larcker, Df, 1987. "An Analysis Of The Use Of Accounting And Market Measures Of Performance In Executive-Compensation Contracts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25, pages 85-129.
    30. Simons, Robert, 1987. "Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 357-374, June.
    31. Gaver, Jennifer J. & Gaver, Kenneth M., 1993. "Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-3), pages 125-160, April.
    32. Fahy, John, 2002. "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 57-77, February.
    33. Healy, Paul M., 1985. "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-3), pages 85-107, April.
    34. Nandini Rajagopalan, 1997. "Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: evidence from electric utility firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(10), pages 761-785, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Won Park & Chunggyu Byun, 2021. "Effect of SME’s Managerial Ability and Executive Compensation on Firm Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Peter Demerjian & Baruch Lev & Sarah McVay, 2012. "Quantifying Managerial Ability: A New Measure and Validity Tests," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(7), pages 1229-1248, July.
    3. Dong, Feng & Doukas, John, 2021. "The effect of managers on M&As," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Xueyan Dong & Kam C. Chan & Yujia Cui & Jenny Xinjiao Guan, 2021. "Strategic deviance and cash holdings," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 742-782, March.
    5. James, Hui Liang & Ngo, Thanh & Wang, Hongxia, 2023. "The impact of more able managers on corporate trade credit," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    6. Liyu He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2021. "The impact of managerial discretion on fair value information in the Australian agricultural sector," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1897-1930, April.
    7. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    8. Najah Attig & Sean Cleary, 2014. "Organizational Capital and Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity: The Effect of Management Quality Practices," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(3), pages 473-504, September.
    9. Bushman, Robert M. & Smith, Abbie J., 2001. "Financial accounting information and corporate governance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 237-333, December.
    10. Andreou, Panayiotis C. & Karasamani, Isabella & Louca, Christodoulos & Ehrlich, Daphna, 2017. "The impact of managerial ability on crisis-period corporate investment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 107-122.
    11. Emeka T. Nwaeze & Simon S. M. Yang & Q. Jennifer Yin, 2006. "Accounting Information and CEO Compensation: The Role of Cash Flow from Operations in the Presence of Earnings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 227-265, March.
    12. Albuquerque, Ana M. & De Franco, Gus & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2013. "Peer choice in CEO compensation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 160-181.
    13. Bum†Jin Park, 2017. "Auditors’ Economic Incentives and the Sensitivity of Managerial Pay to Accounting Performance," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 382-399, December.
    14. Gan, Huiqi & Park, Myung Seok, 2016. "Are more able CEOs getting more compensated? Evidence from the pay-for-performance sensitivity of equity-based incentives," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 64-76.
    15. Ahsan Habib & Dinithi Ranasinghe & Ahesha Perera, 2024. "Business strategy and strategic deviation in accounting, finance, and corporate governance: A review of the empirical literature," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 129-159, March.
    16. Hsihui Chang & Souhei Ishida & Takuma Kochiyama, 2018. "Evaluation of Managerial Ability in the Japanese Setting," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 8, pages 1-22, December.
    17. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    18. Atawnah, Nader & Eshraghi, Arman & Baghdadi, Ghasan A. & Bhatti, Ishaq, 2024. "Managerial ability and firm value: A new perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    19. Nadeem, Muhammad & Zaman, Rashid & Suleman, Tahir & Atawnah, Nader, 2021. "CEO ability, career concerns, firms’ lifecycle and investments in intellectual capital," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 237-251.
    20. Cooper, Christine, 2015. "Entrepreneurs of the self: The development of management control since 1976," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 14-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4689-:d:793625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.