IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4517-d790905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planting Density and Geometry Effect on Canopy Development, Forage Yield and Nutritive Value of Sorghum and Annual Legumes Intercropping

Author

Listed:
  • M. R. Umesh

    (Agriculture Science Center, Clovis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88101, USA
    Department of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur 584104, Karnataka, India)

  • Sangu Angadi

    (Agriculture Science Center, Clovis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88101, USA)

  • Sultan Begna

    (Agriculture Science Center, Clovis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88101, USA
    USDA-ARS, SJVASC—Water Management Research Unit, 9611 S. Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648, USA)

  • Prasanna Gowda

    (USDA-ARS Southeast Area, 141 Experiment Station RD, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA)

Abstract

Forage sorghum (FS) ( Sorghum bicolor L.) is a major forage in crop–livestock production systems. It has low crude protein (CP) and is rich in fiber. Its forage quality can be improved by mixing with legumes rich in CP. Achieving a greater legume contribution to achieve higher CP over monocrops is a challenge for intercropping. Field trials were conducted with lablab ( Lablab purpureus L.), pigeon pea ( Cajanus cajan L.) and cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ), grown with sorghum as mixed 1:1 (sorghum: legumes) and 2:2 (sorghum: legumes) rows. The sorghum plant density was 250,000 and 190,000 plants ha −1 . Periodic crop biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and light interception (LI) were measured, together with forage mixture quality at final harvest. The LAI and LI values were greater for lablab and cowpea intercrops in the 1:1 configuration. Legume forage yield contributed up to 10–12% of the total dry matter (DM). A significant improvement in legume biomass was observed for a sorghum population at 190,000 plants ha −1 with paired rows (2:2) of either lablab or cowpea. Sorghum and total forage yields were higher in both 1:1 and 2:2 configurations with 250,000 plants ha −1 . The CP concentration of the forage mixture was 62–75 g kg −1 DM. The acid and neutral detergent fibers and the digestibility of the forage mixture were not improved to any great extent. The results suggested that sorghum planted at normal populations with paired rows of lablab or cowpea can improve sorghum–legume intercrop productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • M. R. Umesh & Sangu Angadi & Sultan Begna & Prasanna Gowda, 2022. "Planting Density and Geometry Effect on Canopy Development, Forage Yield and Nutritive Value of Sorghum and Annual Legumes Intercropping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4517-:d:790905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sultan Begna & Sangamesh Angadi & Abdel Mesbah & Rangappa Mathada Umesh & Michael Stamm, 2021. "Forage Yield and Quality of Winter Canola–Pea Mixed Cropping System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Honglu Wang & Vivek Yadav & Thongsouk Sompouviseth & Baili Feng, 2022. "Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4517-:d:790905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.