IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4011-d781811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Han River Development: Planning the Riverfront as Seoul’s Natural Landmark

Author

Listed:
  • Jieheerah Yun

    (Architecture Department, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the history of the development of the riverfront of the Han River, the river that runs east-to-west in Seoul. In many scholarly works, the development of a commercial leisure district on the one hand, and local uses such as low-cost housing on the other, have formed two opposing waterfront spatial imaginaries. However, it is questionable whether these two visions are applicable to many metropolitan riverfront developments. The historical absence of an industrial port and the focus on the traffic flow in the Han River have contributed to the linear development of the waterfront area. After analyzing archival data and ethnographical interviews, this paper argues that this idiosyncrasy of the Han River waterfront should not be regarded as either underutilization or underdevelopment. Rather, it should be considered as reflecting the unique urban conditions of Seoul, including the legacy of the Cold War, the wide breadth of the river, and the relatively late expansion of the city south of the river. By situating the Han River development in the context of increasing criticism against the copy-and-paste waterfront developments elsewhere, this paper argues the consideration of “place” needs to include a historical dimension as past spatial practices have the tendency to continue to the present even after new developments are established.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieheerah Yun, 2022. "The Han River Development: Planning the Riverfront as Seoul’s Natural Landmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4011-:d:781811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Djukić & Jelena Marić & Branislav Antonić & Vladimir Kovač & Jugoslav Joković & Nikola Dinkić, 2020. "The Evaluation of Urban Renewal Waterfront Development: The Case of the Sava Riverfront in Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Ker-hsuan Chien, 2018. "Entrepreneurialising urban informality: Transforming governance of informal settlements in Taipei," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2886-2902, October.
    3. Chih-Hung Wang & Yu-Ting Kao & Jo-Tzu Huang, 2021. "Riverfront as a re-territorialising arena of urban governance: Territorialisation and folding of the Xindian River in Taipei metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1245-1261, May.
    4. Pedro Janela Pinto & G. Mathias Kondolf, 2020. "The Fit of Urban Waterfront Interventions: Matters of Size, Money and Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojia Liu & Xi Chen & Yan Huang & Weihong Wang & Mingkan Zhang & Yang Jin, 2023. "Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Marcelia Castro Cardoso & Helionora da Silva Alves & Izaura Cristina Nunes Pereira Costa & Thiago Almeida Vieira, 2021. "Anthropogenic Actions and Socioenvironmental Changes in Lake of Juá, Brazilian Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Ema Alihodžić Jašarović & Svetlana Perović & Sanja Paunović Žarić, 2021. "Impacts of Arsenal Brownfield Regeneration on Urban Development of Tivat in Montenegro: From Industrial Settlement to Center of Nautical Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-34, July.
    4. Chihsin Chiu, 2024. "Greening informality through metabolic coordination: An urban political ecology of governing extralegal housing forms in Taiwan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1127-1146, May.
    5. Eduardo Medeiros & Ana Brandão & Paulo Tormenta Pinto & Sara Silva Lopes, 2021. "Urban Planning Policies to the Renewal of Riverfront Areas: The Lisbon Metropolis Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Jota Samper & Jennifer A. Shelby & Dean Behary, 2020. "The Paradox of Informal Settlements Revealed in an ATLAS of Informality: Findings from Mapping Growth in the Most Common Yet Unmapped Forms of Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. María José Zapata Campos & Ester Barinaga & Jaan-Henrik Kain & Michael Oloko & Patrik Zapata, 2023. "Organising grassroots infrastructure: The (in)visible work of organisational (in)completeness," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 126-145, January.
    8. Chih-Hung Wang & Yu-Ting Kao & Jo-Tzu Huang, 2021. "Riverfront as a re-territorialising arena of urban governance: Territorialisation and folding of the Xindian River in Taipei metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1245-1261, May.
    9. Jorn Koelemaij & Sam Taveirne & Ben Derudder, 2023. "An economic geography perspective on city diplomacy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(6), pages 995-1012, May.
    10. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ & Svetlana K. Perović, 2021. "Demolition-Based Urban Regeneration from a Post-Socialist Perspective: Case Study of a Neighborhood in Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    11. Michele Acuto & Cecilia Dinardi & Colin Marx, 2019. "Transcending (in)formal urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 475-487, February.
    12. Pedro Janela Pinto & Gustavo Lopes dos Santos, 2022. "Olympic Waterfronts: An Evaluation of Wasted Opportunities and Lasting Legacies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4011-:d:781811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.