IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3992-d781533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Technology Investment with Data-Driven Marketing and Government Subsidy in a Platform Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Li

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Gengxin Dai

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Yanfei Xia

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Zongyu Mu

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Guitao Zhang

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Yangyan Shi

    (Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia)

Abstract

Expanding green consumption market and precise data promotion advantages make the platform economy have a significant effect on influencing manufacturers to carry out green R&D and production activities, and government subsidies have a positive incentive effect. In this context, for the studies about platform supply chain management with manufacturer’s green production and the platform’s marketing activities simultaneously are rare, we consider that a manufacturer invests in green technologies to produce products and sell them through a smart platform supply chain by an agency selling or reselling strategy, in which the platform provides data-driven marketing technology to promote green products. Four game models are constructed to study the operational efficiency of the platform supply chain considering selling strategy difference and government subsidy. The results show that: (1) The manufacturer’s green technology and the platform’s data-driven marketing levels, as well as all member’s profits are all influenced by the potential market demand of green products, the sensitivities of consumers to green product attributes, and data analysis technology. (2) The service commission rate charged by the platform plays a main role on the manufacturer’s selling strategy choice, when the service commission rate is low, the manufacturer chooses an agency selling strategy and can obtain more profit, but now the green technology level is not necessarily better than that in the reselling system. With the service commission rate increases, a manufacturer that chooses the reselling strategy can obtain more profit, and the green technology level is better than in the agency selling system. (3) Government subsidy can effectively encourage the manufacturer to improve the green technology level, and now the platform will improve the data-driven marketing level. There is a threshold range of the service commission rate charged by the platform in which the government can guide the manufacturer and the platform to reach an equilibrium selling strategy by regulating the subsidy level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Li & Gengxin Dai & Yanfei Xia & Zongyu Mu & Guitao Zhang & Yangyan Shi, 2022. "Green Technology Investment with Data-Driven Marketing and Government Subsidy in a Platform Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3992-:d:781533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Yafei & Zhu, Zhaohui, 2022. "The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Jian Xue & Ruifeng Gong & Laijun Zhao & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Green Supply-Chain Decision Model for Energy-Saving Products That Accounts for Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2017. "Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 724-741, April.
    4. Zhu, Wenge & He, Yuanjie, 2017. "Green product design in supply chains under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 165-180.
    5. Maxime C. Cohen, 2018. "Big Data and Service Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1709-1723, September.
    6. Young Kwark & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2014. "Online Product Reviews: Implications for Retailers and Competing Manufacturers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 93-110, March.
    7. Lin Tian & Asoo J. Vakharia & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Yifan Xu, 2018. "Marketplace, Reseller, or Hybrid: Strategic Analysis of an Emerging E‐Commerce Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1595-1610, August.
    8. Gongbing Bi & Minyue Jin & Liuyi Ling & Feng Yang, 2017. "Environmental subsidy and the choice of green technology in the presence of green consumers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 547-568, August.
    9. Li, Xiang, 2020. "Reducing channel costs by investing in smart supply chain technologies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2018. "Improving Consumer Welfare and Manufacturer Profit via Government Subsidy Programs: Subsidizing Consumers or Manufacturers?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 752-766, October.
    11. Ma, Shigui & He, Yong & Gu, Ran & Li, Shanshan, 2021. "Sustainable supply chain management considering technology investments and government intervention," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2016. "The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1235-1258, May.
    13. Du, Shaofu & Wang, Lei & Hu, Li & Zhu, Yangguang, 2019. "Platform-led green advertising: Promote the best or promote by performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 115-131.
    14. Yang, Qin & Du, Qiang & Razzaq, Asif & Shang, Yunfeng, 2022. "How volatility in green financing, clean energy, and green economic practices derive sustainable performance through ESG indicators? A sectoral study of G7 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Jung, Seung Hwan & Feng, Tianjun, 2020. "Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 726-739.
    16. Yang, Rui & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 553-568.
    17. Xianjun Geng & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Lai Wei, 2018. "How Add†on Pricing Interacts with Distribution Contracts," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 605-623, April.
    18. Zhang, Shichen & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2020. "Agency selling or reselling: E-tailer information sharing with supplier offline entry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 134-151.
    19. Zhaofu Hong & Hao Wang & Yeming Gong, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," Post-Print hal-02312293, HAL.
    20. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    21. David F. Drake, 2018. "Carbon Tariffs: Effects in Settings with Technology Choice and Foreign Production Cost Advantage," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 667-686, October.
    22. Chen, Pingping & Zhao, Ruiqing & Yan, Yingchen & Li, Xiang, 2020. "Promotional pricing and online business model choice in the presence of retail competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    23. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    24. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kinshuk Jerath & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2259-2280, August.
    25. Bian, Junsong & Zhang, Guoqing & Zhou, Guanghui, 2020. "Manufacturer vs. Consumer Subsidy with Green Technology Investment and Environmental Concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 832-843.
    26. Hong, Zhaofu & Wang, Hao & Gong, Yeming, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 155-168.
    27. Abhijeet Ghoshal & Subodha Kumar & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Dilemma of Data Sharing Alliance: When Do Competing Personalizing and Non‐Personalizing Firms Share Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(8), pages 1918-1936, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xue Wang & Jiayuan Zhang & Deqing Ma & Hao Sun, 2023. "Green Agricultural Products Supply Chain Subsidy Scheme with Green Traceability and Data-Driven Marketing of the Platform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-29, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zongyu Mu & Qiujie Li & Gengxin Dai & Ke Li & Guangming Zhang & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Government Subsidy Policy and Online Selling Strategy in a Platform Supply Chain with Green R&D and DDM Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Yanfei Xia & Quan Guo & Hao Sun & Ke Li & Zongyu Mu, 2022. "Green R&D Financing Strategy in Platform Supply Chain with Data-Driven Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    4. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2021. "The optimal combination between selling mode and logistics service strategy in an e-commerce market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 639-651.
    5. Jin, Wei & Yang, Jun & Wang, Chengfu, 2024. "Cost subsidy or environmental regulation? The effects of government interventions on environmental quality and 3BL performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Alaei, Amir Mohammad & Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Rabbani, Masoud, 2022. "Marketplace, reseller, or web-store channel: The impact of return policy and cross-channel spillover from marketplace to web-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Zheng, Shiyuan & Jiang, Changmin & Fu, Xiaowen & Ge, Ying-En & Shu, Jia, 2022. "Subsidies for green technology adoption under uncertain demand and incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Zhang, Juan & Huang, Jian, 2021. "Vehicle product-line strategy under government subsidy programs for electric/hybrid vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Junbin Wang & Xuan Gao & Zhiguo Wang, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Decisions under E-Commerce Platform Marketplace with Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Chen, Yujing & Zhong, Yuanguang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Impacts of the minimum quantity contract on an online retail platform," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1236-1247.
    11. Cheng, Fei & Chen, Tong & Shen, Yuting & Jing, Xiaodong, 2022. "Impact of green technology improvement and store brand introduction on the sales mode selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    12. Feng, Lipan & Jin, Minyue, 2022. "Platform vs. Manufacturer: Who should implement innovation in e-commerce supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    15. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Liu, He & Li, Jialu & Zhang, Kai & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "Channel strategies when digital platforms emerge: A systematic literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Du, Shaofu & Huang, Chong & Yan, Xia & Tang, Wenzhi, 2024. "Voluntary green technology adoption: The effects of regulatory uncertainty and competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 528-540.
    18. Li, Pei & Tan, Dan & Wang, Guangyong & Wei, Hang & Wu, Jilan, 2021. "Retailer's vertical integration strategies under different business modes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 965-975.
    19. Wang, Tong-Yuan & Chen, Zhen-Song & He, Peng & Govindan, Kannan & Skibniewski, Miroslaw J., 2023. "Alliance strategy in an online retailing supply chain: Motivation, choice, and equilibrium," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Chen, Zhongwei & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Offering return-freight insurance or not: Strategic analysis of an e-seller's decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3992-:d:781533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.