IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3965-d780995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biophysical Impact of Sunflower Crop Rotation on Agricultural Fields

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliia Kussul

    (Department of Mathematical Modeling and Data Analysis, Institute of Physics and Technology, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine
    Department of Space Information Technologies and Systems, Space Research Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and State Space Agency of Ukraine, Kyiv 03187, Ukraine)

  • Klaus Deininger

    (Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, CD 20433, USA)

  • Leonid Shumilo

    (Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Mykola Lavreniuk

    (Department of Mathematical Modeling and Data Analysis, Institute of Physics and Technology, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine
    Department of Space Information Technologies and Systems, Space Research Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and State Space Agency of Ukraine, Kyiv 03187, Ukraine)

  • Daniel Ayalew Ali

    (Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, CD 20433, USA)

  • Oleg Nivievskyi

    (Kyiv School of Economics, Kyiv 02000, Ukraine)

Abstract

Crop rotation is an important determining factor of crop productivity. Sustainable agriculture requires correct rules of crop rotation. Failure to comply with these rules can lead to deterioration of soil biochemical characteristics and land degradation. In Ukraine as well as in many other countries, sunflower monocropping is common practice and the impact of this fact should be studied to find the most precise rules to save the economic potential of land and minimize land degradation factors. This research provides an evaluation of the sunflower monocropping effect on the vegetation indices obtained from MODIS vegetation indices datasets for Ukraine as one of the countries with the biggest sunflower export in Europe. The crop rotation schemes are represented by their area proportions at the village level calculated based on the crop classification maps for 2016 to 2020. This representation gives the possibility to use regression models and f-test feature importance analysis to measure the impact of 3-year and 5-year crop rotation sequences. For these purposes, we use several models: a four-year binary representation model (model A1) and a model with all possible three-year crop rotation scheme representations (model B). These models gave the possibility to evaluate crop rotation schemes based on their biophysical impact on the next sunflower plantings and found that sunflower planting with an interval of three or more years is optimal in terms of the sustainability of soil fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataliia Kussul & Klaus Deininger & Leonid Shumilo & Mykola Lavreniuk & Daniel Ayalew Ali & Oleg Nivievskyi, 2022. "Biophysical Impact of Sunflower Crop Rotation on Agricultural Fields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3965-:d:780995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Nhemachena & Greenwell Matchaya & Charity R. Nhemachena & Selma Karuaihe & Binganidzo Muchara & Sibusiso Nhlengethwa, 2018. "Measuring Baseline Agriculture-Related Sustainable Development Goals Index for Southern Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Stacy M. Zuber & Gevan D. Behnke & Emerson D. Nafziger & Maria B. Villamil, 2018. "Carbon and Nitrogen Content of Soil Organic Matter and Microbial Biomass under Long-Term Crop Rotation and Tillage in Illinois, USA," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Nhemachena, Charles & Matchaya, Greenwell & Nhemachena, C. R. & Karuaihe, S. & Muchara, B. & Nhlengethwa, Sibusiso, 2018. "Measuring baseline agriculture-related sustainable development goals index for southern Africa," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 10(3):1-16..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manal Ammari & Mohammed Chentouf & Mohammed Ammari & Laïla Ben Allal, 2022. "Assessing National Progress in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Shin-Cheng Yeh & Haw-Jeng Chiou & Ai-Wei Wu & Ho-Ching Lee & Homer C. Wu, 2019. "Diverged Preferences towards Sustainable Development Goals? A Comparison between Academia and the Communication Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Minjie Li & Jian Wang & Yihui Chen, 2019. "Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Sustainable Development Capability of Agriculture in Countries along the Belt and Road Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Rakotoarimanana Zy Misa Harivelo & Rakotoarimanana Zy Harifidy, 2022. "A Review of Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development in Madagascar," J, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Charles Samuel Mutengwa & Pearson Mnkeni & Aleck Kondwakwenda, 2023. "Climate-Smart Agriculture and Food Security in Southern Africa: A Review of the Vulnerability of Smallholder Agriculture and Food Security to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Mai Wardeh & Rui Cunha Marques, 2023. "Measuring the SDGs in Refugee Camps: An Insight into Arab States Bordering Syria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Kristian Näschen & Bernd Diekkrüger & Mariele Evers & Britta Höllermann & Stefanie Steinbach & Frank Thonfeld, 2019. "The Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change (LULCC) on Water Resources in a Tropical Catchment in Tanzania under Different Climate Change Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    9. Hongyun Tan & Xiaolie Qi, 2023. "Synergistic Interconstruction of the Green Development Concept in Chinese Rural Ecological Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. David Horan, 2020. "National Baselines for Integrated Implementation of an Environmental Sustainable Development Goal Assessed in a New Integrated SDG Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Júlia A. Nagy & József Benedek & Kinga Ivan, 2018. "Measuring Sustainable Development Goals at a Local Level: A Case of a Metropolitan Area in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Shu Yu & Yongtong Mu, 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Development Assessment: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Jiangning Cao & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Analyzing and Prioritizing the Barriers and Solutions of Sustainable Agriculture for Promoting Sustainable Development Goals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Betzabe Ruiz-Morales & Irma Cristina Espitia-Moreno & Victor G. Alfaro-Garcia & Ernesto Leon-Castro, 2021. "Sustainable Development Goals Analysis with Ordered Weighted Average Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Godwell Nhamo & Charles Nhemachena & Senia Nhamo, 2020. "Using ICT indicators to measure readiness of countries to implement Industry 4.0 and the SDGs," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(2), pages 315-337, April.
    16. Ketut Sukiyono & Muhammad Mustopa Romdhon & Gita Mulyasari & M. Zulkarnain Yuliarso & Musriyadi Nabiu & Agung Trisusilo & Reflis & Dompak M. T. Napitupulu & Yoga Nugroho & May Shiska Puspitasari & Sig, 2022. "The Contribution of Oil Palm Smallholders Farms to the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals-Measurement Attempt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Danilson Varela & Filipa Monteiro & Patrícia Vidigal & Luís Silva & Maria M. Romeiras, 2020. "Mechanisms Implemented for the Sustainable Development of Agriculture: An Overview of Cabo Verde Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Esat Durguti & Emine Gashi & Filloreta Kunoviku-Demiri & Milaim Mehmeti, 2020. "Evaluation of Economic Indicators for Western Balkans Countries: Policy Recommendations for the Financial and Economic Growth," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(1), pages 36-46, January.
    19. Francisco Guijarro & Juan A. Poyatos, 2018. "Designing a Sustainable Development Goal Index through a Goal Programming Model: The Case of EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. R. Margarita Navarro-Pabsdorf & Concepción Martínez-Alcalá & Encarnación Moral-Pajares, 2020. "Can International Trade Help Africa’s Least Developed Countries Achieve SDG-1?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3965-:d:780995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.