Author
Listed:
- Peyman Babashamsi
(Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
Opus International (Malaysia) Berhad, Kuala Lumpur 58100, Malaysia)
- Shabir Hussain Khahro
(College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)
- Hend Ali Omar
(Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tripoli, Tripoli 22131, Libya)
- Sri Atmaja P. Rosyidi
(Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia)
- Abdulnaser M Al-Sabaeei
(Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
- Abdalrhman Milad
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, University of Nizwa, Birkat-al-Mouz, Nizwa 616, Oman)
- Munder Bilema
(Department of Civil Engineering, University of Benghazi, Benghazi 1308, Libya)
- Muslich Hartadi Sutanto
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)
- Nur Izzi Md Yusoff
(Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
Abstract
Airports play a critical role in transporting goods and passengers and supporting the growth of the world economy. Airports spend huge sums annually to maintain and improve pavement functions by expanding the runways, taxiways, and aprons, and perform routine maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing pavements. Besides the traditional direct costs, a comprehensive airport pavement management system should also consider indirect costs such as fuel, crew, passenger delay, aircraft maintenance, and loss of airport revenue when conducting a life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA). Engineers, managers, and stakeholders can make better decisions on the appropriate pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategies by performing economic analyses of the direct and indirect costs. This study performed probabilistic and deterministic LCCA to contrast the effect of direct costs vis-a-vis indirect costs in airport pavement management. A case study found that indirect costs could contribute up to 20% of the total costs when using Portland cement concrete (PCC), hot mixed asphalt (HMA), and crack seat overlay (CSOL). Previous research did not give much attention to maintenance since the researchers believed that routine maintenance makes up only an insignificant percentage of the LCCA. However, routine maintenance of HMA and CSOL makes up 10.2% and 14.2% of the total cost. The rehabilitation cost of PCC makes up 16.3% of the total cost, and the rehabilitation cost for HMA and CSOL makes up 25.4% and 35.2% of the total cost.
Suggested Citation
Peyman Babashamsi & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Hend Ali Omar & Sri Atmaja P. Rosyidi & Abdulnaser M Al-Sabaeei & Abdalrhman Milad & Munder Bilema & Muslich Hartadi Sutanto & Nur Izzi Md Yusoff, 2022.
"A Comparative Study of Probabilistic and Deterministic Methods for the Direct and Indirect Costs in Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Airport Pavements,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3819-:d:778290
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Swei, Omar & Gregory, Jeremy & Kirchain, Randolph, 2017.
"Construction cost estimation: A parametric approach for better estimates of expected cost and variation,"
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 295-305.
- Paola Di Mascio & Alessio Antonini & Piero Narciso & Antonio Greto & Marco Cipriani & Laura Moretti, 2021.
"Proposal and Implementation of a Heliport Pavement Management System: Technical and Economic Comparison of Maintenance Strategies,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3819-:d:778290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.