IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3733-d776847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Different Types of Wastes on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Interlocking Concrete Block Paving (ICBP): A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Turhan Bilir

    (Civil Engineering Department, Avcilar Campus, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34200, Turkey)

  • Beyza Fahriye Aygun

    (Civil Engineering Department, Avcilar Campus, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34200, Turkey)

  • Jinyan Shi

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Osman Gencel

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bartin University, Bartin 74100, Turkey)

  • Togay Ozbakkaloglu

    (Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

Abstract

This paper examines the compressive, flexural and tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, unit weight, water absorption, freeze-thawing, thermal and abrasion resistance, and microstructural properties of Interlocking Concrete Block Paving (ICBP) containing major industrial and agricultural wastes along with an assessment of their environmental effects, with a specific focus on recent work. The color, shape, and patterns of the blocks, their advantages, and their relationship with sustainability are discussed in this study. In addition, a limited number of studies that investigated the use of other byproducts are presented. Based on a review of the existing studies in the literature, recommendations are made for future studies. It has been determined that up to 30% inclusion of waste evaluated in ICBP provides optimal performance in terms of the evaluated properties. Moreover, as ICBP provides opportunities for low-energy concrete block production, the environmental burden and total cost of concrete and concrete block pavements can be reduced. Considering these benefits, studies performed on this subject seem promising. However, one of the missing points in ICBP is that the surface layer is not homogeneous due to the presence of various material types due to the coating design and analysis method. Therefore, modified slab analysis, layered elastic analysis, and finite element analysis can be used to analyze ICBP in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Turhan Bilir & Beyza Fahriye Aygun & Jinyan Shi & Osman Gencel & Togay Ozbakkaloglu, 2022. "Influence of Different Types of Wastes on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Interlocking Concrete Block Paving (ICBP): A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3733-:d:776847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petros Petrounias & Aikaterini Rogkala & Panagiota P. Giannakopoulou & Paraskevi Lampropoulou & Vayia Xanthopoulou & Petros Koutsovitis & Nikolaos Koukouzas & Ioannis Lagogiannis & Georgios Lykokanell, 2021. "An Innovative Experimental Petrographic Study of Concrete Produced by Animal Bones and Human Hair Fibers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Thomas, Blessen Skariah, 2018. "Green concrete partially comprised of rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material – A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3913-3923.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Meng & Ziling Xu & Zeli Liu & Song Chen & Chen Wang & Ben Zhao & An Zhou, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Mechanics and Impact Resistance of Multiphase Lightweight Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yousef R. Alharbi & Aref A. Abadel, 2022. "Engineering Properties of High-Volume Fly Ash Modified Cement Incorporated with Bottle Glass Waste Nanoparticles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Solomon Asrat Endale & Woubishet Zewdu Taffese & Duy-Hai Vo & Mitiku Damtie Yehualaw, 2022. "Rice Husk Ash in Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Miljan Kovačević & Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko & Ivanka Netinger Grubeša & Dorin Radu & Silva Lozančić, 2023. "Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Green Concretes with Rice Husk Ash," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Bergen, Sophia L. & Zemberekci, Lyn & Nair, Sriramya Duddukuri, 2022. "A review of conventional and alternative cementitious materials for geothermal wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Kubilay Kaptan & Sandra Cunha & José Aguiar, 2024. "A Review: Construction and Demolition Waste as a Novel Source for CO 2 Reduction in Portland Cement Production for Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-50, January.
    6. Rafiandy Dwi Putra & Hossein Beidaghy Dizaji & Dripti Kulshresth & Thomas Zeng & Steffen Overmann & Anya Vollpracht, 2024. "Characterisation of Bottom Ashes from Non-Woody Biomass Combustion for Application as Sustainable Supplementary Cementitious Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Syed Nasir Abbas & Muhammad Irshad Qureshi & Malik Muneeb Abid & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Anne Wai Man Ng, 2022. "An Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Concrete by Applying Sand Coating on Recycled High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) and Electronic-Wastes (E-Wastes) Used as a Partial Replacement of Natural Co," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3733-:d:776847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.