IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3700-d776246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Coordination between Agricultural Production and Environmental Protection in Kazakhstan Based on the Rationality of the Objective Weighting Method

Author

Listed:
  • Danmeng Wang

    (College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
    Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Shilin Li

    (College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
    Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Shynggys Toktarbek

    (College of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro-Technical University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Nueryia Jiakula

    (College of Pharmacy, Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Ping Ma

    (College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
    Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Yongzhong Feng

    (College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
    Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture, Xianyang 712100, China)

Abstract

In the context of sustainable development, agricultural production and environmental protection are inseparable, and environmental quality directly affects regional agricultural production safety. Kazakhstan is the largest food producer and exporter in Central Asia, and the quality of its agricultural environment is of great significance to international food security. This study focuses on the rationality of the entropy weight, factor weight, and CRITIC weight in the agricultural environmental evaluation within the common objective weight method, and comprehensively evaluates the coordination of environmental protection and agricultural production in Kazakhstan. The results show that (1) CRITIC weights are the most stable, followed by factor weights, while entropy weighting is the most unstable; objective weighting methods have their limitations and must be related to actual conditions and subjective experience. (2) The level of environmental protection and the degree of coordination are most problematic near the Aral Sea, followed by the remaining western region; the results reveal that these evaluation indexs are also insufficient at Kostany and Karagandy in the central region; this is caused by historical issues, climate change, natural conditions, and agricultural management patterns. Investment in environmental protection and agricultural production management should be coordinated in a targeted manner. (3) Except for the areas near the Aral Sea, the level of agricultural production in other states is very promising. This research serves as a reference for environmental assessment research, environmental governance investment, and agricultural production management in Kazakhstan.

Suggested Citation

  • Danmeng Wang & Shilin Li & Shynggys Toktarbek & Nueryia Jiakula & Ping Ma & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Research on the Coordination between Agricultural Production and Environmental Protection in Kazakhstan Based on the Rationality of the Objective Weighting Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3700-:d:776246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pang, Jihong & Liu, Xiaojing & Huang, Qinghua, 2020. "A new quality evaluation system of soil and water conservation for sustainable agricultural development," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Barrett, T. & Feola, G. & Krylova, V. & Khusnitdinova, M., 2017. "The application of Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (RAAIS) to agricultural adaptation to climate change in Kazakhstan: A critical evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 106-113.
    3. Zhao, Yabo & Wang, Shaojian & Ge, Yuejing & Liu, Qianqian & Liu, Xiaofeng, 2017. "The spatial differentiation of the coupling relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment in countries globally: A comprehensive assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 313-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feifei Ye & Rongyan You & Haitian Lu & Sirui Han & Long-Hao Yang, 2023. "The Classification Impact of Different Types of Environmental Regulation on Chinese Provincial Carbon Emission Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Danmeng Wang & Ruolan Li & Guoxi Gao & Nueryia Jiakula & Shynggys Toktarbek & Shilin Li & Ping Ma & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in Kazakhstan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Danmeng Wang & Guoxi Gao & Ruolan Li & Shynggys Toktarbek & Nueryia Jiakula & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Limiting Factors and Environmental Adaptability for Staple Crops in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoqing Lin & Chunyan Lu & Kaishan Song & Ying Su & Yifan Lei & Lianxiu Zhong & Yibin Gao, 2020. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Variance between Urbanization Quality and Eco-Environment Pressure: A Case Study of the West Taiwan Strait Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Rana Shahzad Noor & Fiaz Hussain & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Muhammad Umair, 2020. "Cost And Profitability Analysis Of Cherry Production: The Case Study Of District Quetta, Pakistan," Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 74-80, June.
    3. Xingcheng Ge & Jun Xu & Yong Xie & Xin Guo & Deyan Yang, 2021. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of Eco-Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities—A Case Study of Typical Resource-Based Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Wei Wei & Yuanjun Zhu & Hao Li & Kebin Zhang & Baitian Wang & Xiaohui Yang & Zhongjie Shi, 2018. "Spatio-Temporal Reorganization of Cropland Development in Central Asia during the Post-Soviet Era: A Sustainable Implication in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Xiang Pan & Peiji Shi & Na Wu, 2020. "Spatial–Temporal Interaction Relationship between Ecosystem Services and Urbanization of Urban Agglomerations in the Transitional Zone of Three Natural Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Wen Liu & Long Ma & Jilili Abuduwaili, 2021. "Potentially Toxic Elements in Oasis Agricultural Soils Caused by High-Intensity Exploitation in the Piedmont Zone of the Tianshan Mountains, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. O. V. Dovgal & M. V. Kravchenko & N. I. Demchuk & O. A. Odnoshevnaya & O.Y. Novikov & U. Y. Andrusiv & I. M. Lesik & I. R. Popadynets, 2017. "Methods Of Competitiveness Assessment Of Agricultural Enterprise In Eastern Europe," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 231-242, December.
    8. Weimin Yan & Benhong Peng & Guo Wei & Anxia Wan, 2021. "Is There Coupling Effect between Financial Support and Improvement of Human Settlement? A Case Study of the Middle and Lower Regions of the Yangtze River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Xiang Gao & Ke Wang & Kevin Lo & Ruiyang Wen & Xiaoting Mi & Kuanmei Liu & Xingxing Huang, 2021. "An Evaluation of Coupling Coordination between Rural Development and Water Environment in Northwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Tianqi Zhang & Yue Zhou & Ming Li & Haoran Zhang & Tong Wang & Yu Tian, 2022. "Impacts of Urbanization on Drainage System Health and Sustainable Drainage Recommendations for Future Scenarios—A Small City Case in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Danmeng Wang & Guoxi Gao & Ruolan Li & Shynggys Toktarbek & Nueryia Jiakula & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Limiting Factors and Environmental Adaptability for Staple Crops in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Chuansheng Wu & Weixuan Fan & Lingling Qi & Levent Kutlu, 2023. "Study on the Effectiveness of Environmental Regulations and Its Spatial Spillover in China’s High-Quality Human Habitat Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Liang Geng & Xinyue Zhao & Yu An & Lingtong Peng & Dan Ye, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Interaction between Urban Economic and Ecological Environment—A Case Study of Wuhan City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Zhiguo Wang & Junbin Wang & Guoping Zhang & Zhixiong Wang, 2021. "Evaluation of Agricultural Extension Service for Sustainable Agricultural Development Using a Hybrid Entropy and TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Jingjing Zhang & Qian Zhou & Min Cao & Hong Liu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Change of Eco-Environmental Quality in the Oasis City and Its Correlation with Urbanization Based on RSEI : A Case Study of Urumqi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Seguin, Rose & Lefsrud, Mark G. & Delormier, Treena & Adamowski, Jan, 2021. "Assessing constraints to agricultural development in circumpolar Canada through an innovation systems lens," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    17. Zhang, Qian & Shen, Juqin & Sun, Fuhua, 2021. "Spatiotemporal differentiation of coupling coordination degree between economic development and water environment and its influencing factors using GWR in China's province," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 462(C).
    18. Virginia López Nevárez, 2023. "Possibilities for Sustainable Development in Corn Intensification Scenarios," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 106-130.
    19. Yi Huang & Qianqian Qiu & Yehua Sheng & Xiangqiang Min & Yuwei Cao, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Urbanization and the Eco-Environment: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Yu Zhang & Wenliang Geng & Pengyan Zhang & Erling Li & Tianqi Rong & Ying Liu & Jingwen Shao & Hao Chang, 2020. "Dynamic Changes, Spatiotemporal Differences and Factors Influencing the Urban Eco-Efficiency in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3700-:d:776246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.