IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1911-d744122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fresh Air–Natural Microclimate Comfort Index: A New Tourism Climate Index Applied in Chinese Scenic Spots

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Yang

    (Economics and Management College, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Changshun Li

    (Economics and Management College, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Fujian Meteorological Service Center, Fuzhou 350001, China)

  • Muhammad Bilal

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

  • Shaofei Jin

    (Economics and Management College, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Department of Geography, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

Severe air pollution in China has caused significant tourism transformation for pursuing fresh air in microclimate tourism markets. Contemporary practices simply measure the air freshness of destinations and scenic spots using a single index, i.e., primarily negative oxygen ions (O 2 − ). This index cannot comprehensively reveal scenic spots’ air freshness degree and determine the dynamic interactions between air freshness and scenic spots’ tourism development, thus inducing an illusion of air freshness for the target scenic spots. Meanwhile, the current fresh air index primarily ignores connections with the microclimate index of scenic spots and cannot provide a multidimensional index for scenic spots to take advantage of both air and microclimate resources for diverse tourism products and service production. Therefore, this study proposes a multidimensional index, the fresh air–natural microclimate comfort index (FAI-NMCI), connecting the fresh air index with the natural microclimate comfort index of scenic spots together from transdisciplinary and multidisciplinary perspectives. This study utilizes FAI-NMCI to measure four scenic spots of Fujian Province, and reveals in-depth results of scenic spots’ air freshness and natural microclimate comfort degree together. The results demonstrate that the four scenic spots in Fujian province of China had different levels of air freshness degree and natural microclimate comfort degree in 2018. The natural scenic spots were mostly distributed in Healing Fresh, Very Fresh, and Super Fresh levels of FAI with the most comfortable and comfortable levels of NMCI. The cultural scenic spots were mostly distributed in Relatively Fresh and Healing Fresh levels of FAI with the most comfortable and comfortable levels of NMCI. Meanwhile, the FAI-NMCI of natural and cultural scenic spots also had significant differences within 24 Jieqi, which will promote dynamic and creative utilization of those resources in microclimate tourism development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Yang & Changshun Li & Muhammad Bilal & Shaofei Jin, 2022. "Fresh Air–Natural Microclimate Comfort Index: A New Tourism Climate Index Applied in Chinese Scenic Spots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1911-:d:744122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Xu & Ou, Xunmin & Yang, Xi & Qi, Tianyu & Nam, Kyung-Min & Zhang, Da & Zhang, Xiliang, 2017. "Socioeconomic burden of air pollution in China: Province-level analysis based on energy economic model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 478-489.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anđelina Marić Stanković & Ivana Radonjić & Marko Petković & Darko Divnić, 2022. "Climatic Elements as Development Factors of Health Tourism in South Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Chaoji & Cui, XueQin & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can & Xing, Lu & Zhang, Ning & Shen, Shudong & Bai, Yuqi & Deng, Zhu, 2019. "Incorporating health co-benefits into regional carbon emission reduction policy making: A case study of China’s power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Luo, Xiangyu & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Jingyi & Jin, Jing & Yang, Jun, 2021. "Simulating PM2.5 removal in an urban ecosystem based on the social-ecological model framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    3. Liao, Liping & Du, Minzhe & Chen, Zhongfei, 2021. "Air pollution, health care use and medical costs: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Li, Nan & Chen, Wenying & Zhang, Qiang, 2020. "Development of China TIMES-30P model and its application to model China's provincial low carbon transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Kyung-Min Nam & Xu Zhang & Min Zhong & Eri Saikawa & Xiliang Zhang, 2019. "Health effects of ozone and particulate matter pollution in China: a province-level CGE analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(2), pages 269-293, October.
    6. Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Cheng & Zhou, Dequn, 2021. "Do energy subsidies reduce fiscal and household non-energy expenditures? A regional heterogeneity assessment on coal-to-gas program in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Tang Meirun & Lahcene Makhloufi & Mohamad Ghozali Hassan, 2020. "Environmental Outcomes of Green Entrepreneurship Harmonization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Beidi Diao & Lei Ding & Qiong Zhang & Junli Na & Jinhua Cheng, 2020. "Impact of Urbanization on PM 2.5 -Related Health and Economic Loss in China 338 Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Shibing You & Hengli Wang & Miao Zhang & Haitao Song & Xiaoting Xu & Yongzeng Lai, 2020. "Assessment of monthly economic losses in Wuhan under the lockdown against COVID-19," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Kyung-Min Nam & Heeyeun Yoon, 2019. "Air pollution in East Asia and its regional and socioeconomic impacts: an introduction," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(2), pages 249-254, October.
    11. Li, Jianglong & Gao, Jinfeng & Ho, Mun Sing, 2024. "Causal effect of aviation on air pollution: An instrumental variable from faraway COVID-19 restrictions in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Jiawen Cao & Jin Chen, 2021. "The Impact of an Authoritarian Personality on Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Air Pollution Mitigation through Interactions with Social Norms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Li, Zhensheng, 2021. "Does natural gas pricing reform establish an effective mechanism in China: A policy evaluation perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    14. Gu, Yan & Ho, Kung-Cheng & Xia, Senmao & Yan, Cheng, 2022. "Do public environmental concerns promote new energy enterprises' development? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Ai, Hongshan & Wang, Mengyuan & Zhang, Yue-Jun & Zhu, Tian-Tian, 2022. "How does air pollution affect urban innovation capability? Evidence from 281 cities in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 166-178.
    16. Chang, Shiyan & Yang, Xi & Zheng, Haotian & Wang, Shuxiao & Zhang, Xiliang, 2020. "Air quality and health co-benefits of China's national emission trading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1911-:d:744122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.