IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1714-d740616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Regional Differences: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China’s New Environmental Protection Law

Author

Listed:
  • Qin Liu

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ying Zhu

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Weixin Yang

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xueyu Wang

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Environmental regulations have a certain impact on regional green technology innovation affected by regional differences. Using the panel data of 30 provincial-level administrative regions in China (excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) from 2011 to 2019, we consider China’s new environmental protection law (NEPL) as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate the impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation in a difference-in-differences (DID) framework and further analyze the influences of regional differences. The results indicate that environmental regulations can promote regional green technology innovation, and that regional differences have a significant impact on this issue. Furthermore, environmental regulations in regions with high and low levels of economic development and education, and regions with medium and low levels of energy consumption have a significant impact on green technology innovation. The government should reasonably formulate environmental regulation policies on the basis of regional differences, encourage cross-regional exchanges and cooperation, and more efficiently stimulate regional green technology innovation to achieve sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Liu & Ying Zhu & Weixin Yang & Xueyu Wang, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Regional Differences: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China’s New Environmental Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1714-:d:740616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huaming Zhang & Zhishuang Zhu & Yingjun Fan, 2018. "The impact of environmental regulation on the coordinated development of environment and economy in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(2), pages 473-489, March.
    2. Zhang, Ning & Jiang, Xue-Feng, 2019. "The effect of environmental policy on Chinese firm's green productivity and shadow price: A metafrontier input distance function approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 129-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samira Ben Belgacem & Ghousia Khatoon & Abad Alzuman, 2023. "Role of Renewable Energy and Financial Innovation in Environmental Protection: Empirical Evidence from UAE and Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Ran Gu & Zenghua He, 2023. "Can Environmental Regulation Improve Labor Allocation Efficiency? Evidence from China’s New Environmental Protection Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Yevheniia Ziabina & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Yana Us, 2023. "Convergence of Energy Policies between the EU and Ukraine under the Green Deal Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Weixin Yang & Yue Hu & Qinyi Ding & Hao Gao & Lingguang Li, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of the Green Development Level of Provinces in Eastern and Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Yang, Weixin & Yang, Yunpeng & Chen, Hongmin, 2022. "How to stimulate Chinese energy companies to comply with emission regulations? Evidence from four-party evolutionary game analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Weixin Yang & Hao Gao & Yunpeng Yang & Jiacheng Liao, 2022. "Embodied Carbon in China’s Export Trade: A Multi Region Input-Output Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Weixin Yang & Hao Gao & Yunpeng Yang, 2022. "Analysis of Influencing Factors of Embodied Carbon in China’s Export Trade in the Background of “Carbon Peak” and “Carbon Neutrality”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yifei Zhang & Sheng Li & Fang Zhang, 2020. "Does an Emissions Trading Policy Improve Environmental Efficiency? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Hui Wang & Haiming Chen & Vincent Tawiah, 2023. "Does Ethical Behaviour Affect Sustainable Development? Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Mingxiong Bi & Chencheng Wang & Dian Fu & Xun Tan & Shurong Yu & Junbai Pan & Kun Lv, 2022. "Chinese-Style Fiscal Decentralization, Ecological Attention of Government, and Regional Energy Intensity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Mohamed M. Sraieb & Lasha Labadze, 2022. "A Dynamic Perspective on the Gender Diversity–Firms’ Environmental Performances Nexus: Evidence from the Energy Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Wu, Yinyin & Yu, Jie & Song, Malin & Chen, Jiandong & Hou, Wenxuan, 2021. "Shadow prices of industrial air pollutant emissions in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 726-736.
    6. Yang, Jun & Cheng, Jixin & Zou, Ran & Geng, Zhifei, 2021. "Industrial SO2 technical efficiency, reduction potential and technology heterogeneities of China's prefecture-level cities: A multi-hierarchy meta-frontier parametric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Hao Liu & Lin Ma, 2020. "Spatial Pattern and Effects of Urban Coordinated Development in China’s Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Renjie Yu & Peng Yuan & Fandi Yang & Gongxiong Jiang, 2023. "Effects of Vertical Unbundling on the Operational and Environmental Efficiency of Chinese Thermal Power Firms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Wang, En-Ze & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "The impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth in China: Is environmental regulation a curse or a blessing?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-58.
    10. Yaoxiaoxue Hong & Xianling Jiang & Beibei Shi & Chang Yu, 2022. "Do Fiscal Environmental Protection Expenditures Crowd Out Corporate Environmental Protection Investments?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Xiaoqing Zhao & Sinan Li & Junwei Pu & Peipei Miao & Qian Wang & Kun Tan, 2019. "Optimization of the National Land Space Based on the Coordination of Urban-Agricultural-Ecological Functions in the Karst Areas of Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Ling-Yun He & Hong-Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Spillover or crowding out? The effects of environmental regulation on residents’ willingness to pay for environmental protection," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 611-630, January.
    13. Wang, Ailun & Hu, Shuo & Li, Jianglong, 2021. "Does economic development help achieve the goals of environmental regulation? Evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Lena, Daniela & Pasurka, Carl A. & Cucculelli, Marco, 2022. "Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Evidence from Italian manufacturing industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Xianpu Xu & Xiawan Li & Lin Zheng, 2022. "A Blessing or a Curse? Exploring the Impact of Environmental Regulation on China’s Regional Green Development from the Perspective of Governance Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Kou, Po & Han, Ying & Qi, Xiaoyuan, 2022. "The operational mechanism and effectiveness of China's central environmental protection inspection: Evidence from air pollution," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Rui Pang & Dan Zheng & Minjun Shi, 2021. "Agglomeration externalities and the non‐linear performance of environmental regulation: Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1701-1731, September.
    18. Qing Ye & Rongting Zhou & Muhammad Azfar Anwar & Ahmad Nabeel Siddiquei & Fahad Asmi, 2020. "Entrepreneurs and Environmental Sustainability in the Digital Era: Regional and Institutional Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Xiaoyu Li & Lan Xu, 2021. "Human development associated with environmental quality in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Xiao Zhang & Yuanjie Deng & Mengyang Hou & Shunbo Yao, 2021. "Response of Land Use Change to the Grain for Green Program and Its Driving Forces in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1714-:d:740616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.