IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1704-d740450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geotourism Hazards and Carrying Capacity in Geosites of Sangkulirang-Mangkalihat Karst, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Arzyana Sunkar

    (Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16001, Indonesia)

  • Anindika Putri Lakspriyanti

    (Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16001, Indonesia)

  • Eko Haryono

    (Karst Research Group, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Mohsen Brahmi

    (FEMS Faculty, University of Sfax, Sfax 20655, Tunisia
    Faculty of Arts and Design, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Pindi Setiawan

    (Division of Campaign and Public Media, Forest Watch Indonesia, Bogor 16129, Indonesia)

  • Aziz Fardhani Jaya

    (Division of Campaign and Public Media, Forest Watch Indonesia, Bogor 16129, Indonesia)

Abstract

The protection of resources and the safety of visitors are two essential elements in the sustainability of any tourism destination. The Sangkulirang-Mangkalihat karst has the potential to be developed as a UNESCO Global Geopark based on the diversity and unique nature of its geological heritage. Proper management efforts should be carefully planned to ensure sustainability of the geosite. Intact natural conditions can be a potential hazard to visitors and, conversely, the presence of visitors can interfere with the natural preservation of the sensitive karst area. Physical, biological, and human activities that may endanger visitors should be identified and limiting the number of visitors received by each geosite should also be considered. This paper aims to identify the potential tourism hazards of physical, biological, and human activities and to calculate the tourist’s carrying capacity of three geosites (Tewet cave, Nyadeng lake, and Bloyot cave) in the Sangkulirang-Mangkalihat karst. The identification of potential hazards was conducted in each geosite and analyzed and assessed using management options referencing UNEP, NPSA, and APEC, whereas the carrying capacity was assessed with reference to the Cifuentes formulation. Meanwhile, the carrying capacity was assessed at three levels, namely physical carrying capacity (PCC), real carrying capacity (RCC), and effective carrying capacity (ECC). The highest physical and biological hazards were the ravines in the Tewet cave, as well as a moderate level of risk, such as slippery, steep terrain and the presence of crocodiles. Meanwhile, the potential hazards faced by Nyadeng lake and Bloyot cave were classified as low risk. The carrying capacity assessments indicated that Bloyot cave is able to accommodate the largest number of visitors on a daily basis. Therefore, the carrying capacity results of each geosite can serve as a reference for managers to limit the number of visitors to the site in order to ensure the sustainability of Sangkulirang-Mangkalihat geosites.

Suggested Citation

  • Arzyana Sunkar & Anindika Putri Lakspriyanti & Eko Haryono & Mohsen Brahmi & Pindi Setiawan & Aziz Fardhani Jaya, 2022. "Geotourism Hazards and Carrying Capacity in Geosites of Sangkulirang-Mangkalihat Karst, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1704-:d:740450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodica-Manuela Gogonea & Adrian Aurel Baltălungă & Adrian Nedelcu & Daniela Dumitrescu, 2017. "Tourism Pressure at the Regional Level in the Context of Sustainable Development in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Piera Buonincontri & Roberto Micera & María Murillo-Romero & Tommasina Pianese, 2021. "Where Does Sustainability Stand in Underground Tourism? A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daminda Sumanapala & Isabelle D. Wolf, 2022. "Introducing Geotourism to Diversify the Visitor Experience in Protected Areas and Reduce Impacts on Overused Attractions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Zamru Ajuhari & Azlizam Aziz & Sam Shor Nahar Yaakob & Shamsul Abu Bakar & Manohar Mariapan, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Methods of Assessing Carrying Capacity in Recreation and Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Ying Liu & Lei Tian & Zhiyi Wang & Peiyong He & Meng Li & Na Wang & Yang Yu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Interprovincial Ecological Efficiency and Its Determinants in China: A Super-Efficiency SBM Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogdan-Constantin Ibănescu & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Alina Munteanu & Corneliu Iațu, 2018. "The Impact of Tourism on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Gabriela Popescu & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Elena Peț & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2022. "Sustainability through Rural Tourism in Moieciu Area-Development Analysis and Future Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Carolina Aldao & Tanja A. Mihalic, 2020. "New Frontiers in Travel Motivation and Social Media: The Case of Longyearbyen, the High Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. José María Martín Martín & Jose Antonio Salinas Fernández & José Antonio Rodríguez Martín & Juan De Dios Jiménez Aguilera, 2017. "Assessment of the Tourism’s Potential as a Sustainable Development Instrument in Terms of Annual Stability: Application to Spanish Rural Destinations in Process of Consolidation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Agata Nicolosi & Valentina Rosa Laganà & Lorenzo Cortese & Donatella Privitera, 2018. "Using the Network and MCA on Tourist Attractions. The Case of Aeolian Islands, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & Yeamduan Narangajavana-Kaosiri & Ismael Lengua-Lengua, 2018. "Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. José María Martín Martín & Jose Manuel Guaita Martínez & José Antonio Salinas Fernández, 2018. "An Analysis of the Factors behind the Citizen’s Attitude of Rejection towards Tourism in a Context of Overtourism and Economic Dependence on This Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Monica Maria Coroș & Donatella Privitera & Loredana Maria Păunescu & Adrian Nedelcu & Cristina Lupu & Alexandru Ganușceac, 2021. "Mărginimea Sibiului Tells Its Story: Sustainability, Cultural Heritage and Rural Tourism—A Supply-Side Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Marian ZAHARIA & Rodica-Manuela GOGONEA & Aniela BÄ‚LÄ‚CESCU, 2018. "Rural Tourism Pressure Evolutions in Center Region of Romania," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Carmen NÄ‚STASE (ed.), The 14th Economic International Conference: Strategies and Development Policies of Territories: International, Country, Region, City, Location Challen, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 25, pages 280-290, Editura Lumen.
    10. Ionica SOARE & Florina Oana VIRLANUTA & Iulian Adrian SORCARU & Ludmila Daniela MANEA & Mihaela-Carmen MUNTEAN & Rozalia NISTOR, 2019. "Territorial Cohesion and Competitiveness in Tourism Development in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 129-138.
    11. Paola M. A. Paniccia & Luna Leoni & Silvia Baiocco, 2017. "Interpreting Sustainability through Co-Evolution: Evidence from Religious Accommodations in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Ralf Bochert & Laura Cismaru & Diana Foris, 2017. "Connecting the Members of Generation Y to Destination Brands: A Case Study of the CUBIS Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Hossein Mousazadeh & Amir Ghorbani & Hossein Azadi & Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani & Ali Zangiabadi & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Developing Sustainable Behaviors for Underground Heritage Tourism Management: The Case of Persian Qanats, a UNESCO World Heritage Property," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Mirea Cosmin Nicolae & Sarbu Alexandra Maria & Ionescu Andra Maria, 2021. "The Relationship Between The Number Of Tourists Arrived In Romania'S Development Regions And The Gross Domestic Product," Cactus - The tourism journal for research, education, culture and soul, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 16-23.
    15. Corina Aurora Marin (Barbu) & Elena Condrea & Norina Popovici, 2020. "Quality Management in the Hotel Industry in the Macro-Regions of Romania," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 19, pages 182-191, Editura Lumen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1704-:d:740450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.