IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1227-d730350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of Innovation Efficiency in China’s Electronics and Communication Equipment Manufacturing Industry-Based on Dynamic Network SBM Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jinfa Li

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Ruijie Qin

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Hongbing Jiang

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

In recent years, China’s electronics and communication equipment manufacturing (ECEM) industry has overgrown, and the government should assess the innovation performance of the industry for its sustainable development. However, most previous studies on the innovation efficiency of the ECEM industry have ignored the link and carry-over variables. This paper uses the number of patent applications as a link variable to consider the stage of innovation activities. It divides the innovation activities of the electronics industry into two stages: technology development and results in transformation. To consider the dynamics of innovation activities, this paper uses capital stock as a period carry-over variable and evaluates the change of innovation efficiency over time. In this paper, the DNSBM model is used to measure the innovation efficiency of the ECEM industry in 26 Chinese provinces from 2013–2019. This model includes both stage link variables and period carry-over variables, thus allowing for overall efficiency and stage efficiency and period efficiency. The results show that the overall innovation efficiency values in the Chinese ECEM industry are low, there are considerable differences between the two-stage efficiency values in the east, central and western regions, and the overall efficiency values show a slow upward trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinfa Li & Ruijie Qin & Hongbing Jiang, 2022. "Measurement of Innovation Efficiency in China’s Electronics and Communication Equipment Manufacturing Industry-Based on Dynamic Network SBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1227-:d:730350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoke Zhao & Xuhui Ding & Liang Li, 2021. "Research on Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation and Green Transformation of Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Zhang, Rui & Sun, Kai & Delgado, Michael S. & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2012. "Productivity in China's high technology industry: Regional heterogeneity and R&D," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 127-141.
    3. Ying Qu & Ying Yu & Andrea Appolloni & Mengru Li & Yue Liu, 2017. "Measuring Green Growth Efficiency for Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Qingxian An & Fanyong Meng & Beibei Xiong & Zongrun Wang & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "Assessing the relative efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 707-729, July.
    5. Xiangyu Guo & Canhui Deng & Dan Wang & Xu Du & Jiali Li & Bowen Wan, 2021. "International Comparison of the Efficiency of Agricultural Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Case Study of G20 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Chae Hyun Im & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "Comparing and Identifying Influential Factors of Technological Innovation Efficiency in Manufacturing and Service Industries Using DEA: A Study of SMEs in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Shoufu & Lin, Ruoyun & Sun, Ji & Wang, Fei & Wu, Weixiang, 2021. "Dynamically evaluating technological innovation efficiency of high-tech industry in China: Provincial, regional and industrial perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Xueling Guan & Lijiang Chen & Qing Xia & Zhaohui Qin, 2022. "Innovation Efficiency of Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry from the Perspective of Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Delgado, Michael S. & McCloud, Nadine & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2014. "A generalized empirical model of corruption, foreign direct investment, and growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 298-316.
    4. Wujie Zhang & Fu Gu, 2021. "Towards Micro-Level Green Growth: A Framework to Recognize Corporate Growth Status, Path and Adopt Eco-Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Yu-Hong Ai & Di-Yun Peng & Huan-Huan Xiong, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Regulation Intensity on Green Technology Innovation: From the Perspective of Political and Business Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Tieng Kimseng & Amna Javed & Chawalit Jeenanunta & Youji Kohda, 2020. "Sustaining Innovation through Joining Global Supply Chain Networks: The Case of Manufacturing Firms in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Chen, Xiaoqing & Liu, Xinwang & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2022. "Comparative analysis of total factor productivity in China's high-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Huaide Wen & Jun Dai, 2021. "The Change of Sources of Growth and Sustainable Development in China: Based on the Extended EKC Explanation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Rui Zhang & Yong Ma & Jie Ren, 2022. "Green Development Performance Evaluation Based on Dual Perspectives of Level and Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Xiao Han & Yining Chen & Hehua Zhao, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution, Influencing Factors, and Driving Mechanisms of Environmental Regulation Performance Disparities: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Geng, Xin & Sun, Kai, 2019. "Gradient estimation of the local-constant semiparametric smooth coefficient model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Ying Song & Lu Yang & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Charles Chen, 2023. "Analyzing the Role of High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration in Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry: the Case of China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3847-3877, December.
    13. Liu, Xing & Wu, Xianhua & Zhang, Weipan, 2024. "A new DEA model and its application in performance evaluation of scientific research activities in the universities of China's double first-class initiative," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Honma, Satoshi & Ushifusa, Yoshiaki & Okamura, Soyoka & Vandercamme, Lilu, 2023. "Measuring carbon emissions performance of Japan's metal industry: Energy inputs, agglomeration, and the potential for green recovery reduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Congjia Huo & Lingming Chen & Peipei Dong, 2022. "Threshold Effect of Industry Heterogeneity on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    16. Evaldas Vaičiukynas & Meda Andrijauskienė & Paulius Danėnas & Raminta Benetytė, 2023. "Socio-eco-efficiency of high-tech companies: a cross-sector and cross-regional study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12761-12790, November.
    17. Xing Yin & Xiaolin Chen & Xiaolin Xu & Lianmin Zhang, 2020. "Tax or Subsidy? Optimal Carbon Emission Policy: A Supply Chain Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Wang, Ya & Pan, Jiao-feng & Pei, Rui-min & Yi, Bo-Wen & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Islam Hassanin & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Managing Supply Chain Activities in the Field of Energy Production Focusing on Renewables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-33, June.
    20. Marian Rizov & Xufei Zhang, 2014. "Regional disparities and productivity in China: Evidence from manufacturing micro data," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 321-339, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1227-:d:730350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.