IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1200-d729943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Current Challenges in Evaluating Environmental Impacts for Aggregate Producers through a Case Study in Western Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Lee

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Panagiota Papadopoulou

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Gauti Asbjörnsson

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Erik Hulthén

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Magnus Evertsson

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

To improve environmental performance of a product or activity, an understanding of the environmental impacts associated with it is needed. Quantification of environmental impacts can be achieved through the standardized measurement-based tool of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, challenges occur when trying to apply a standardized tool to a nonstandardized industry such as the aggregate industry. This study aims to provide greater understanding of the challenges facing the aggregate industry, particularly producers, in applying LCA. This was conducted through a literature review, to establish the current understanding of challenges, accompanied by a case study where a site-specific LCA was conducted with a large enterprise at a crushed-rock-production facility in western Sweden, to gain new industry-specific insight. A total of 13 challenges were identified: seven methodological and six systemic. Out of these 13 challenges, 3 were deemed a high risk to the implementation of LCA by aggregate producers, and 3 to the integrity of results. A best-practice framework is suggested to incorporate LCA into current environmental management techniques utilized at quarry sites in Sweden to overcome some challenges. However, LCA used for environmental management should not lead to double work if LCA is being utilized for Environmental Product Declarations, and further research is encouraged to find appropriate solutions with the most efficient allocation of the resources needed in conducting LCA studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Lee & Panagiota Papadopoulou & Gauti Asbjörnsson & Erik Hulthén & Magnus Evertsson, 2022. "Understanding Current Challenges in Evaluating Environmental Impacts for Aggregate Producers through a Case Study in Western Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1200-:d:729943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jullien, A. & Proust, C. & Martaud, T. & Rayssac, E. & Ropert, C., 2012. "Variability in the environmental impacts of aggregate production," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Capony, Adrien & Muresan, Bogdan & Dauvergne, Michel & Auriol, Jean-Claude & Ferber, Valéry & Jullien, Agnès, 2013. "Monitoring and environmental modeling of earthwork impacts: A road construction case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 124-133.
    2. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Poon, Chi Sun & Lo, Irene M.C. & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2016. "Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 67-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1200-:d:729943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.