IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p755-d721871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Customs Regulation Framework in the Eurasian Economic Union in the Context of Sustainable Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Vovchenko

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, Rostov State University of Economics, 344002 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Olga Ivanova

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, Rostov State University of Economics, 344002 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Elena Kostoglodova

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, Rostov State University of Economics, 344002 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Stanislav Khapilin

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, Rostov State University of Economics, 344002 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Karina Sapegina

    (Institute of Industrial Management of Economics and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint-Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The formation of a customs administration framework based on the digital economy in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) requires the application of fundamentally new technologies. The successful implementation of digital technologies in the information space of the EAEU presupposes the solution of a number of problems associated with the ensuring the implementation of the concept of sustainable development of the EEU member states in the new economic reality and transition to a new paradigm of customs administration based on the digitalization of the processes of regulation of foreign economic activity. Based on this paradigm, we set the following tasks: to identify trends and substantiate the need for digitalization of the customs administration mechanism in the Eurasian Economic Union based on the use of new technologies; to reveal the meaningful features of digital technologies that are promising for the development of the mechanism of customs administration of the EAEU; consider the applied aspects of the latest information technologies used in the course of EAEU customs administration system digitalization; and assess the prospects for their use, analyze the prospects of organizational, legal and managerial support of this process in the EAEU at the supranational and national levels. The article concludes that within the framework of the digital transformation of the EAEU, new opportunities are opening up for the customs regulation framework, based on the introduction of technologies for analyzing large amounts of data, immersive technologies, blockchain, the use of innovative methods for obtaining and processing customs information (satellite tracking, radio frequency identification), and the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in customs control processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Vovchenko & Olga Ivanova & Elena Kostoglodova & Stanislav Khapilin & Karina Sapegina, 2022. "Improving the Customs Regulation Framework in the Eurasian Economic Union in the Context of Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:755-:d:721871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrej Krickovic, 2014. "Imperial nostalgia or prudent geopolitics? Russia's efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space in geopolitical perspective," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 503-528, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyriaki I. Kafka & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2024. "Impact-Relation Map of Innovative Service Development Regarding the Sustainable Growth for Emerging Markets," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 180-203, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Popescu Raluca Maria, 2021. "European Union vs. Eurasian Union – a brief comparative analysis and perspectives for cooperation," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1294-1304, December.
    2. Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Sung, Jinsok & Talipova, Amina & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Analyzing energy trade policy in Central Asia using the intercountry trade force approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 441-454.
    3. Lucia Tajoli, 2022. "Too much of a good thing? Russia-EU international trade relations at times of war," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 807-834, December.
    4. Juliet Johnson & Seçkin Köstem, 2016. "Frustrated Leadership: Russia's Economic Alternative to the West," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 207-216, May.
    5. Maia Chankseliani, 2023. "Who funds the production of globally visible research in the Global South?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 783-801, January.
    6. Irina Busygina & Mikhail Filippov, 2018. "Russia And The Eurasian Economic Union: Conflicting Incentives For An Institutional Compromise," HSE Working papers WP BRP 31/IR/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Libman, Alexander, 2015. "Ukrainian Crisis, Economic Crisis in Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union," MPRA Paper 63861, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    big data; Eurasian Economic Union; customs administration; digital transformation; G28; G38; F02; F15;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:755-:d:721871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.