Author
Listed:
- Amir Khorram-Manesh
(Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
Department of Research and Development, Armed Forces Center for Defense Medicine, 426 76 Västra Frölunda, Sweden)
- Luc J. Mortelmans
(Center for Research and Education in Emergency Care, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Regedim, VUB, Brussels and Department of Emergency Medicine, ZNA, Stuivenberg, 2060 Antwerp, Belgium)
- Yohan Robinson
(Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
Department of Research and Development, Armed Forces Center for Defense Medicine, 426 76 Västra Frölunda, Sweden)
- Frederick M. Burkle
(Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)
- Krzysztof Goniewicz
(Department of Security, Military University of Aviation, 08-521 Dęblin, Poland)
Abstract
Due to the similarity in skills and assets, Civilian-Military collaboration has emerged as one of the most reliable partnerships during the disaster and public health emergency management to address all necessary elements of surge capacity, i.e., staff, stuff, structure (space), and systems. This study aimed to evaluate this collaboration before and during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The outcomes of the systematic review revealed several published reports on successful civilian-military collaboration and proposed a need for further improvement. One hundred sixty-six individuals from 19 countries responded to nine questions, included in an online survey with the possibility to leave comments if necessary. The questionnaire referred to elements such as command and control, safety, communication, assessment, triage, treatment, and transport, as the crucial components of emergency management. The comprehensive examination of the survey results together with registered comments revealed a possible improvement in collaboration particularly on the strategic levels, i.e., meetings at the command-and-control level, safety, communication, and networking issues. While logistic collaboration seemed to be unchanged, the practical parts of the collaboration, i.e., clinical and non-clinical operational partnership (Triage and Treatment), mutual education, training, and operational understanding of each organization remained unchanged. In conclusion, although the current pandemic may have facilitated a more intense collaboration between civilian and military healthcare organizations, it lacks practical partnership and operative engagement, representing two crucial elements necessary for harmony and compatibility of both systems. Such collaboration may require a political will and perhaps a mutual civilian-military authority.
Suggested Citation
Amir Khorram-Manesh & Luc J. Mortelmans & Yohan Robinson & Frederick M. Burkle & Krzysztof Goniewicz, 2022.
"Civilian-Military Collaboration before and during COVID-19 Pandemic—A Systematic Review and a Pilot Survey among Practitioners,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:624-:d:719146
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Zakaria A. Mani & Krzysztof Goniewicz, 2023.
"Adapting Disaster Preparedness Strategies to Changing Climate Patterns in Saudi Arabia: A Rapid Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
- Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Abdullah Al Masud & Farid Ahammad Sobhani & Bablu Kumar Dhar & Mohammad Sabbir Hossain & Abu Ishaque Hossain, 2023.
"An Empirical Study on Emergency of Distant Tertiary Education in the Southern Region of Bangladesh during COVID-19: Policy Implication,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, February.
- Krzysztof Goniewicz & Mariusz Goniewicz & Anna Włoszczak-Szubzda & Dorota Lasota & Frederick M. Burkle & Marta Borowska-Stefańska & Szymon Wiśniewski & Amir Khorram-Manesh, 2022.
"The Moral, Ethical, Personal, and Professional Challenges Faced by Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:624-:d:719146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.