IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p1013-d726504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Forecasts as the Factor Determining the Coordination of Logistics Processes by Logistic Operator

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Kramarz

    (Department of Organizational and Management, Logistics Institute, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Mariusz Kmiecik

    (Department of Organizational and Management, Logistics Institute, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

Abstract

(1) Background: Currently, logistics operators are struggling with the problem of acquiring new areas to create added value. One of such challenges is acquiring a new function in the form of demand forecasting and coordination skills. The increase in the need to forecast demand is related to the increasing complexity of the distribution network, omnichannel systems and turbulent environment. It is necessary to have a comprehensive approach to the distribution network and to develop competences related to coordination. For the authors, one of the most important coordination factors is the quality of forecasts, especially in relation to modern logistics operators. (2) Methods: In literature studies, the authors combine prognostic abilities with a predisposition to coordinate logistic processes in distribution networks. The aim of the research is to develop a forecasting model that will allow a logistic operator who aspires to coordinate logistics processes to create forecasts in the distribution system. The tool was developed in the R programming language and allows for forecasting based on data from the Warehouse Management System; (3) Results: The quality of forecasts is correlated with the characteristics of the products, the relationship between the manufacturing company and the logistics operator, and the configuration of the distribution network in individual chains. The results of the forecasts were compared with selected features of each of the 5 distribution networks that were tested. In parallel, the attributes of a company capable of forecasting in the distribution network were analyzed. These attributes were also compared to those of the logistics operator. (4) Conclusions: The authors proved that a logistic operator with a set of defined features is capable of generating demand in the entire distribution network.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Kramarz & Mariusz Kmiecik, 2022. "Quality of Forecasts as the Factor Determining the Coordination of Logistics Processes by Logistic Operator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1013-:d:726504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/1013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/1013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reyes Levalle, Rodrigo & Nof, Shimon Y., 2015. "Resilience by teaming in supply network formation and re-configuration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago Bastos & Leonor C. Teixeira & João C. O. Matias & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Agroforestry Biomass Recovery Supply Chain Management: A More Efficient Information Flow Model Based on a Web Platform," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Mariusz Kmiecik, 2022. "Logistics Coordination Based on Inventory Management and Transportation Planning by Third-Party Logistics (3PL)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Qihui & Scoglio, Caterina M. & Gruenbacher, Don M., 2021. "Robustness of supply chain networks against underload cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    2. Nguyen, Win P.V. & Nof, Shimon Y., 2020. "Strategic lines of collaboration in response to disruption propagation (CRDP) through cyber-physical systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    4. Zavitsas, Konstantinos & Zis, Thalis & Bell, Michael G.H., 2018. "The impact of flexible environmental policy on maritime supply chain resilience," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 116-128.
    5. Wang, Jiepeng & Zhou, Hong & Sun, Xinlei & Yuan, Yufei, 2023. "A novel supply chain network evolving model under random and targeted disruptions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    7. Dixit, Vijaya & Verma, Priyanka & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2020. "Assessment of pre and post-disaster supply chain resilience based on network structural parameters with CVaR as a risk measure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Jiakuan Chen & Haoyu Wen, 2023. "The application of complex network theory for resilience improvement of knowledge-intensive supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1140-1161, September.
    9. Zahiri, Behzad & Zhuang, Jun & Mohammadi, Mehrdad, 2017. "Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: A pharmaceutical case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 109-142.
    10. Raquel Sanchis & Raúl Poler, 2019. "Enterprise Resilience Assessment—A Quantitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1013-:d:726504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.