IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16535-d998953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of G20 Box Office Revenues: A Film Geography Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jiejie Wang

    (School of Tourism and Events Management, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Mengli Zhang

    (School of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Paul Adams

    (Department of Geography and the Environment, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Peng Zheng

    (School of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Xiaoli Wang

    (School of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

The geography of film is an interdisciplinary field of geography and communication. Understanding the spatial and temporal characteristics of the global box office scale represented by the G20 is important for expanding the research scope of film geography focusing on “space” and promoting the development of film industries around the world. This paper studies the spatial and temporal characteristics and influencing factors of G20 box office revenues 2003–2019 using the Theil coefficient, spatial analysis, and a panel vector auto-regressive model. According to the research: (1) the distribution of the top box office revenues within the G20 is obvious; the scale differences among these countries are gradually decreasing and the scale differences between China and the United States are the most significant; (2) the box office differences of the G20 are gradually decreasing; the Asian movie market represented by China and South Korea is developing rapidly; (3) from the perspective of the transfer of movie box office scale types within a Markov Chain, the number of countries in type II and III is the largest and the transfer among different types is mainly to high-level types; and (4) the factors influencing the box office of G20 movies are the number of screens, per capita gross national income, the working-age population, and GDP, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiejie Wang & Mengli Zhang & Paul Adams & Peng Zheng & Xiaoli Wang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of G20 Box Office Revenues: A Film Geography Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16535-:d:998953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16535/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16535/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaenssle Sophia & Budzinski Oliver & Astakhova Daria, 2018. "Conquering the Box Office: Factors Influencing Success of International Movies in Russia," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 245-266, December.
    2. Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2015. "The Rise of Hollywood East: Regional Film Offices as Intermediaries in Film and Television Production Clusters," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 433-450, March.
    3. Moon, Sangkil & Song, Reo, 2015. "The Roles of Cultural Elements in International Retailing of Cultural Products: An Application to the Motion Picture Industry," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 154-170.
    4. In Kyung Kim, 2021. "The impact of social distancing on box-office revenue: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 93-125, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jordi McKenzie, 2023. "The economics of movies (revisited): A survey of recent literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 480-525, April.
    2. Jane, Wen-Jhan, 2021. "Cultural distance in international films: An empirical investigation of a sample selection model," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Rui Chen & Zhiyi Chen & Yongzhong Yang, 2021. "The Creation and Operation Strategy of Disney’s Mulan: Cultural Appropriation and Cultural Discount," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    5. Michael Hoyler & Allan Watson, 2019. "Framing city networks through temporary projects: (Trans)national film production beyond ‘Global Hollywood’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 943-959, April.
    6. Asbjørn Karlsen & Henrik Brynthe Lund & Markus Steen, 2019. "Cluster absorptive capacity: Two types of intermediaries in technology upgrading of manufacturing clusters," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_17, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    7. Agnieszka Orankiewicz & Aleksandra Bartosiewicz, 2023. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Adoption Factors of Film Distribution Business Models in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Jin, Yu & Xi, Haonan & Wang, Xuhui & Ren, Xin & Yuan, Libin, 2022. "Evaluation of the Integration Policy in China: Does the Integration of Culture and Tourism Promote Tourism Development?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Moon, Sangkil & Bergey, Paul K. & Bove, Liliana L. & Robinson, Stefanie, 2016. "Message framing and individual traits in adopting innovative, sustainable products (ISPs): Evidence from biofuel adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3553-3560.
    10. Shin, Sunny Y. & McKenzie, Jordi & Crosby, Paul, 2024. "Cultural affinity and international trade in motion pictures: Empirical evidence using categorised internet search activity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    11. Hailin Zhang & Xina Yuan & Tae Ho Song, 2020. "Examining the role of the marketing activity and eWOM in the movie diffusion: the decomposition perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 589-608, September.
    12. Yayla, Serdar & Kutlubay, Omer Cem & Cicek, Mesut & Yeniyurt, Sengun, 2023. "Once upon a time in a foreign market: The role of cultural distance in the economic performance of multilateral non-equity partnerships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    13. Verdiana Giannetti & Jieke Chen, 2023. "An investigation of the impact of Black male and female actors on US movies’ box-office across countries," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 269-291, June.
    14. Elisa Salvador & Jean-Paul Simon & Pierre-Jean Benghozi, 2019. "Facing disruption: the cinema value chain in the digital age," Post-Print hal-02300929, HAL.
    15. Moon-Yong Kim & Sangkil Moon, 2021. "The effects of cultural distance on online brand popularity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 302-324, May.
    16. Su-Hyun Berg, 2018. "Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and Hallyu: The Case of the Film and TV Industry in South Korea," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 4(1), pages 33-52, January.
    17. Reo Song & Sangkil Moon & Haipeng (Allan) Chen & Mark B. Houston, 2018. "When marketing strategy meets culture: the role of culture in product evaluations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 384-402, May.
    18. Li, Shenyu & Popkowsky Leszczyc, Peter T.L. & Qiu, Chun, 2023. "International retailer performance: Disentangling the interplay between rule of law and culture," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 193-209.
    19. Moon, Sangkil & Kim, Seung-Wook & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2024. "Dynamic relationship changes between reviewers and consumers in online product reviews," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 70-84.
    20. Budzinski, Oliver & Gänßle, Sophia & Lindstädt-Dreusicke, Nadine, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Antitrust in Unterhaltungsmärkten," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 147, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    spatial and temporal characteristics; influencing factors; box office revenues; film geography; G20;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16535-:d:998953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.