IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16436-d997468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Analysis of Merging Vehicles Based on the Speed Difference between on-Ramp and Following Mainstream Vehicles Using NGSIM Data

Author

Listed:
  • Qinaat Hussain

    (Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Charitha Dias

    (Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
    Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Ali Al-Shahrani

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Intizar Hussain

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

Abstract

Highway merging points are critical elements due to the interactions between merging vehicles and following vehicles on the outermost lane of the highway stream. Such interactions could have significant implications for safety and capacity at ramp locations. The aim of this study was to investigate the spacing adjustment behavior by the interacting drivers at merging locations. In this regard, we relied on the NGSIM trajectory dataset to investigate the impacts of the speed difference between the following and merging vehicles on a space headway, considering different geometric designs and vehicle classes. Nonlinear regression models were estimated to analyze the interactions. The results showed a significant and exponential tendency for headway reduction, particularly when the difference in speed was higher than 30 km/h. In addition, the findings revealed that the highway with an auxiliary lane performed better in terms of headway reduction. Furthermore, the space headway reduction trend was higher when the following vehicle was a truck rather than a car. Policymakers and practitioners aiming to improve road safety at merging locations could use this study’s findings. The resulting parameters can also be utilized in microsimulation models, e.g., for headway adjustment behavior in car-following models.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinaat Hussain & Charitha Dias & Ali Al-Shahrani & Intizar Hussain, 2022. "Safety Analysis of Merging Vehicles Based on the Speed Difference between on-Ramp and Following Mainstream Vehicles Using NGSIM Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16436-:d:997468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Ronghui & Hyman, Geoff, 2012. "Modelling motorway merge: The current practice in the UK and towards establishing general principles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 199-210.
    2. Hao, Peng & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff) & Guo, Dong & Ji, Qiang, 2014. "Cycle-by-cycle intersection queue length distribution estimation using sample travel times," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 185-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Qiaoli & Shi, Zhongke & Yu, Shaowei & Zhou, Jie, 2018. "Analytical evaluation of the use of left-turn phasing for single left-turn lane only," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 266-303.
    2. Farrell, Jay A & Wu, Guoyuan & Hu, Wang & Oswald, David & Hao, Peng, 2023. "Lane-Level Localization and Map Matching for Advanced Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) Applications," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1f7661b4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Hao, Peng & Wang, Chao, 2018. "Evaluating Environmental Impact of Traffic Congestion in Real Time Based on Sparse Mobile Crowd-sourced Data," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7q6760rz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Hao, Peng & Ban, Xuegang, 2015. "Long queue estimation for signalized intersections using mobile data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 54-73.
    5. Wong, Wai & Shen, Shengyin & Zhao, Yan & Liu, Henry X., 2019. "On the estimation of connected vehicle penetration rate based on single-source connected vehicle data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 169-191.
    6. Wang, Zhengli & Zhu, Liyun & Ran, Bin & Jiang, Hai, 2020. "Queue profile estimation at a signalized intersection by exploiting the spatiotemporal propagation of shockwaves," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 59-71.
    7. Xingliang Liu & Jian Wang & Tangzhi Liu & Jin Xu, 2021. "Forecasting Spatiotemporal Boundary of Emergency-Event-Based Traffic Congestion in Expressway Network Considering Highway Node Acceptance Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Bishal Dhakal & Ahmed Al-Kaisy, 2024. "An Empirical Evaluation of a New Heuristic Method for Identifying Safety Improvement Sites on Rural Highways: An Oregon Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Yang, Qiaoli & Shi, Zhongke, 2018. "The evolution process of queues at signalized intersections under batch arrivals," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 413-425.
    10. Comert, Gurcan, 2016. "Queue length estimation from probe vehicles at isolated intersections: Estimators for primary parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 502-521.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16436-:d:997468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.