IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14305-d960567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Theory of Exploitation as a Support for Management Accounting in an Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Przemysław Drożyner

    (Departament of Technical Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 11 Street, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Stanisław Młynarski

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

In each company operating on the market, various business processes are implemented: production, logistics, warehouse, marketing, HR and payroll and many others. In enterprises with a high organizational culture, these processes are always measured; various indicators related to the effectiveness and efficiency of these processes are measured and analyzed, and on this basis management decisions are made for the entire enterprise. The aim of this work was to verify the assumption that by properly defining the process of “exploitation” of technical objects (understood as the combination of the processes of operation and maintenance), it is possible to obtain information not only about the effectiveness of this process itself, but also about other business processes carried out in companies. For this purpose, the so-called “exploitation states” characteristic of technical objects used in two different types of small enterprises, i.e., mechanical workshops and taxi enterprises, were defined. Then, in two such workshops and three taxi companies, the time spent by the objects in defined states was measured, and the results were analyzed. We found significant differences in these values even for companies of a similar size and nature. After discussing the results with the owners of the companies, it was found that the differences resulted from different visions of the functioning of each company and—which is very important—their context. In the following, it was shown that properly defining and measuring the exploitation states of technical objects can be useful for improving not only “technical” processes but also most of the business processes carried out in enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Przemysław Drożyner & Stanisław Młynarski, 2022. "The Theory of Exploitation as a Support for Management Accounting in an Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14305-:d:960567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek & Katarzyna Antosz & Ryszard Wyczółkowski & Dariusz Mazurkiewicz & Bo Sun & Cheng Qian & Yi Ren, 2021. "Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Ait-El-Cadi, Abdessamad & Gharbi, Ali & Dhouib, Karem & Artiba, Abdelhakim, 2021. "Integrated production, maintenance and quality control policy for unreliable manufacturing systems under dynamic inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Gonçalo Cardeal & Kristina Höse & Inês Ribeiro & Uwe Götze, 2020. "Sustainable Business Models–Canvas for Sustainability, Evaluation Method, and Their Application to Additive Manufacturing in Aircraft Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Maria Holgado & Marco Macchi & Stephen Evans, 2020. "Exploring the impacts and contributions of maintenance function for sustainable manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7292-7310, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iva Gregurec & Martina Tomičić Furjan & Katarina Tomičić-Pupek, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Business Models in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Simon Stork & Rolf Morgenstern & Bernd Pölling & Jan-Henning Feil, 2023. "Holistic Business Model Conceptualisation—Capturing Sustainability Contributions Illustrated by Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "Maintenance policies and models: A bibliometric and literature review of strategies for reuse and remanufacturing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed & Moustafa Zino, 2023. "Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model in selecting pandemic hospital site," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Muhammad Sarwar Sindhu & Muhammad Ahsan & Khalil Ahmad & Imran Ameen Khan, 2024. "Modeling of Decision-Making Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 720-729.
    7. Nunzia Capobianco & Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Roberto Vona, 2021. "Toward a Sustainable Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in the Oil and Gas Industry: A PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    9. Miguel A. C. Michalski & Arthur H. A. Melani & Renan F. da Silva & Gilberto F. M. de Souza & Fernando H. Hamaji, 2021. "Fault Detection and Diagnosis Based on Unsupervised Machine Learning Methods: A Kaplan Turbine Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Kristina Höse & Anika Süß & Uwe Götze, 2022. "Sustainability-Related Strategic Evaluation of Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Tomasz Dziabas & Mariusz Deja & Aleksandra Wiśniewska, 2022. "A Strategy for Managing the Operation of Technical Infrastructure Based on the Analysis of “Bad Actors”—A Case Study of LOTOS Group S.A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    14. Sinisterra, Wilfrido Quiñones & Lima, Victor Hugo Resende & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Aribisala, Adetoye Ayokunle, 2023. "A delay-time model to integrate the sequence of resumable jobs, inspection policy, and quality for a single-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Grzegorz Kłosowski & Anna Hoła & Tomasz Rymarczyk & Mariusz Mazurek & Konrad Niderla & Magdalena Rzemieniak, 2023. "Using Machine Learning in Electrical Tomography for Building Energy Efficiency through Moisture Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, February.
    16. Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang & Ziquan Xiang, 2021. "Prioritizing the Solutions to Reverse Logistics Barriers for the E-Commerce Industry in Pakistan Based on a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Delpla, Victor & Kenné, Jean-Pierre & Hof, Lucas A., 2023. "Integration of operational lockout/tagout in a joint production and maintenance policy of a smart production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Joanna Sadłowska-Wrzesińska & Kamila Piosik & Żaneta Nejman, 2022. "Psychosocial Context of OSH-Remote Work of Academic Teachers in the Perspective of Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Adam Wisniewski, 2021. "The Link Between Business Relations and Success of an Organization: A Research Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 521-535.
    20. Grzegorz Kłosowski & Anna Hoła & Tomasz Rymarczyk & Łukasz Skowron & Tomasz Wołowiec & Marcin Kowalski, 2021. "The Concept of Using LSTM to Detect Moisture in Brick Walls by Means of Electrical Impedance Tomography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14305-:d:960567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.