IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14220-d959452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution Features and Robustness of Global Photovoltaic Trade Network

Author

Listed:
  • Jianxiong Xiao

    (Department of Information Engineering, Guiyang Institute of Information Science and Technology, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Chao Xiong

    (School of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Wei Deng

    (School of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Guihai Yu

    (School of Big Data Statistics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Photovoltaic industry trade has become a global trade activity, and a wide range of photovoltaic trade relations have been formed between countries. In order to further strengthen and balance trade relations, this paper analyzes global photovoltaic (PV) trade from the perspective of complex networks. We employ network indicators and the cascading process of risk propagation to analyze the evolution features and the vulnerability of the PV trade network. Firstly, we establish the global PV trade networks from 2000 to 2021 based on the PV trade flow between countries. We then explore evolution features and analyze the influencing factors of the trade network structure. Finally, we simulate the cascading process of risk propagation on the trade network based on an improved bootstrap percolation model. The evolution features reveal the following three results: (1) the scale of global PV trade continues to grow, and the participation of some countries has increased significantly; (2) the global PV trade network has small-world characteristics, and the related products have high circulation efficiency; and (3) the global PV trade network has a core-periphery structure, while a few countries drive most of the trade. China, Germany, and the U.S. are the top PV traders. Some Asian countries, such as Vietnam, are gradually increasing their share of the market. The QAP regression analysis shows that the gaps in GDP and electricity access rate are the biggest facilitating and hindering factors in the global PV trade, respectively. The simulation results show that the global PV trade network is vulnerable to targeted risk and is robust to randomness risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianxiong Xiao & Chao Xiong & Wei Deng & Guihai Yu, 2022. "Evolution Features and Robustness of Global Photovoltaic Trade Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14220-:d:959452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuik, Onno & Branger, Frédéric & Quirion, Philippe, 2019. "Competitive advantage in the renewable energy industry: Evidence from a gravity model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 472-481.
    2. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2014. "A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 23-33.
    3. Guan, Qing & An, Haizhong, 2017. "The exploration on the trade preferences of cooperation partners in four energy commodities’ international trade: Crude oil, coal, natural gas and photovoltaic," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 154-163.
    4. Chen, Zhihua & An, Haizhong & An, Feng & Guan, Qing & Hao, Xiaoqing, 2018. "Structural risk evaluation of global gas trade by a network-based dynamics simulation model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 457-471.
    5. Qing Guan & Haizhong An & Xiaoqing Hao & Xiaoliang Jia, 2016. "The Impact of Countries’ Roles on the International Photovoltaic Trade Pattern: The Complex Networks Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Guan, Qing & An, Haizhong & Wang, Kaiming & Duan, Yueran & Zhang, Yixiong, 2020. "Functional trade patterns and their contributions to international photovoltaic trade revealed by network motifs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Grünewald, Philipp & Cockerill, Tim & Contestabile, Marcello & Pearson, Peter, 2011. "The role of large scale storage in a GB low carbon energy future: Issues and policy challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 4807-4815, September.
    8. Fu, Xin & Yang, Yu & Dong, Wen & Wang, Changjian & Liu, Yi, 2017. "Spatial structure, inequality and trading community of renewable energy networks: A comparative study of solar and hydro energy product trades," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 22-31.
    9. Baccini, Leonardo & Kim, Soo Yeon, 2012. "Preventing protectionism: international institutions and trade policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45573, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong, 2022. "Comparative study on transmission mechanism of supply shortage risk in the international trade of iron ore, pig iron and crude steel," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Leonardo Baccini & Soo Kim, 2012. "Preventing protectionism: International institutions and trade policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 369-398, December.
    12. Wang, Chao & Huang, Xia & Hu, Xiaoqian & Zhao, Longfeng & Liu, Chao & Ghadimi, Pezhman, 2021. "Trade characteristics, competition patterns and COVID-19 related shock propagation in the global solar photovoltaic cell trade," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    13. Shem, Caitlin & Simsek, Yeliz & Hutfilter, Ursula Fuentes & Urmee, Tania, 2019. "Potentials and opportunities for low carbon energy transition in Vietnam: A policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Li & Keyin Liu & Zixin Yang & Yi Qu, 2023. "Evolution and Impacting Factors of Global Renewable Energy Products Trade Network: An Empirical Investigation Based on ERGM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Wang, Chao & Huang, Xia & Hu, Xiaoqian & Zhao, Longfeng & Liu, Chao & Ghadimi, Pezhman, 2021. "Trade characteristics, competition patterns and COVID-19 related shock propagation in the global solar photovoltaic cell trade," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Aydin B. Yildirim & J. Tyson Chatagnier & Arlo Poletti & Dirk De Bièvre, 2018. "The internationalization of production and the politics of compliance in WTO disputes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-75, March.
    4. Zeyu Hou & Xiaoyu Niu & Zhaoyuan Yu & Wei Chen, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Market Dynamics of the International Liquefied Natural Gas Trade: A Multilevel Network Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Stephanie Rickard & Daniel Kono, 2014. "Think globally, buy locally: International agreements and government procurement," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 333-352, September.
    6. Kang, Xinyu & Wang, Minxi & Chen, Lu & Li, Xin, 2023. "Supply risk propagation of global copper industry chain based on multi-layer complex network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    7. Liwen Sun & Ying Han, 2022. "Spatial Correlation Network Structure and Influencing Factors of Two-Stage Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Stephen, Matthew D. & Parízek, Michal, 2019. "New Powers and the Distribution of Preferences in Global Trade Governance: From Deadlock and Drift to Fragmentation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(6), pages 735-758.
    9. Zhu, Zhiyun & Dong, Zhiliang & Zhang, Yanxing & Suo, Guibin & Liu, Sen, 2020. "Strategic mineral resource competition: Strategies of the dominator and nondominator," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Jason S. Davis, 2022. "Screening for losers: Trade institutions and information," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-37, January.
    11. Ding, Junfeng & Du, Debin & Duan, Dezhong & Xia, Qifan & Zhang, Qiang, 2024. "A network analysis of global competition in photovoltaic technologies: Evidence from patent data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    12. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Jiang, Meihui & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2024. "Supply shock propagation in the multi-layer network of global steel product chain: Additive effect of trade and production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Tetiana Kniazieva & Anna Shevchenko & Hanna Radchenko & Olena Komova & Liliia Pankova, 2021. "The Impact Of Transnationalization On The Global Consumer Market," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(5).
    14. Li, Jiaman & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Kangyin & Liu, Guixian, 2021. "Natural gas trade network of countries and regions along the belt and road: Where to go in the future?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Liu, Yuxin & Li, Yunting & Pu, Yue, 2024. "Exploring the endogenous structure and evolutionary mechanism of the global coal trade network," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Soumyajit Mazumder, 2016. "Can I stay a BIT longer? The effect of bilateral investment treaties on political survival," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 477-521, December.
    17. Lin, Jing & Mou, Dunguo, 2021. "Analysis of the optimal spatial distribution of natural gas under ‘transition from coal to gas’ in China," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Wang, Xingxing & Li, Huajiao & Zhu, Depeng & Zhong, Weiqiong & Xing, Wanli & Wang, Anjian, 2021. "Research on global natural graphite trade risk countermeasures based on the maximum entropy principle," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2019. "Deglobalization 2.0," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18560.
    20. Al-Ubaydli, Omar, 2020. "Understanding How the Coronavirus Affects the Global Economy: A Guide for Non-Economists," MPRA Paper 99642, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14220-:d:959452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.