IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14134-d957299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driving Factors and Spatial Temporal Heterogeneity of Low-Carbon Coupling Coordination between the Logistics Industry and Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yijiao Wang

    (School of Business, Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, Xi’an 710100, China)

Abstract

The low-carbon coupling coordination of the logistics industry and manufacturing industry is an ecological innovation organization that integrates economic benefits, social benefits, and ecological benefits under strict carbon emission constraints. In order to control or reduce the carbon dioxide emission of the two industries, it is very important to understand the driving factors of emission change and formulate effective carbon policy. The Yangtze River Delta has developed manufacturing clusters and a perfect logistics system. The Yangtze River Delta region is taken as an example. Firstly, the coupling coordination model is used to calculate the low-carbon coupling coordination scheduling of the region. Then, the spatiotemporal geographically time-weighted regression model (GTWR) is used to explore the spatial heterogeneity of driving factors of low-carbon coupling coordination. The empirical results show the following: the low-carbon coupling coordination in the Yangtze River Delta is at a good coordination, and each driving factor has a positive effect on the coupling coordination. From the regional city level and time change level, the regression coefficients of each driving factors are analyzed, and it is found that the impact of driving factors on low-carbon coupling is significantly different between large cities and small and medium-sized cities, and the spatial heterogeneity of driving factors is significant. Specifically, the marginal impact of human capital, technological progress, and urbanization level on the low-carbon coupling between logistics and manufacturing in the Yangtze River Delta is increasing year by year; the marginal impact of international trade, industrial policy, and foreign investment on the Yangtze River Delta is decreasing year by year; and the marginal impact of capital investment and infrastructure on the Yangtze River Delta is relatively stable. Finally, according to the heterogeneity of driving factors in cities of different sizes, the corresponding development suggestions are put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Yijiao Wang, 2022. "Driving Factors and Spatial Temporal Heterogeneity of Low-Carbon Coupling Coordination between the Logistics Industry and Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14134-:d:957299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grimaud, Andre & Tournemaine, Frederic, 2007. "Why can an environmental policy tax promote growth through the channel of education?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 27-36, April.
    2. Yoshihiro Hamaguchi, 2021. "Environmental policy and social status preference for education in an Uzawa–Lucas model," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 456-468, July.
    3. Wang, Yafei & Liao, Meng & Wang, Yafei & Xu, Lixiao & Malik, Arunima, 2021. "The impact of foreign direct investment on China's carbon emissions through energy intensity and emissions trading system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Pautrel, Xavier, 2012. "Environmental Policy, Education And Growth: A Reappraisal When Lifetime Is Finite," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 661-685, November.
    5. Alfred Greiner, 2005. "Fiscal Policy In An Endogenous Growth Model With Public Capital And Pollution," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 56(1), pages 67-84, March.
    6. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Gao, Beiying & Du, Kerui & Du, Gang, 2018. "Industrial sectors' energy rebound effect: An empirical study of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 408-416.
    7. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun, 2016. "The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(2), pages 392-403.
    8. Wu, Haitao & Xu, Lina & Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Yan, Guoyao, 2020. "How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin, Baogui & Zhang, Tengda & Santibanez-Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R., 2024. "Synergistic effects of regional environmental governance on alleviating energy poverty and promoting household decarbonization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xavier Pautrel, 2015. "Abatement Technology and the Environment–Growth Nexus with Education," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(3), pages 297-318, July.
    2. Fuzhong Chen & Guohai Jiang & Kangyin Dong, 2022. "How do FDI inflows curvilinearly affect carbon emissions? Threshold effects of energy service availability and cleanliness," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 798-824, December.
    3. Che, Shuai & Wang, Jun, 2022. "Can environmental regulation solve the carbon curse of natural resource dependence: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2018. "Green Attitude and Economic Growth," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(4), pages 757-779, August.
    5. Carlo Carraro & Enrica De Cian & Lea Nicita, 2009. "Modeling Biased Technical Change. Implications For Climate Policy," Working Papers 2009_27, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    6. Kirschbaum, Birgit & Soretz, Susanne, 2017. "Human capital, pollution control, and endogenous growth," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168186, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Basseti, Thomas & Benos, Nikos & Karagiannis, Stelios, 2010. "How policy can influence human capital accumulation and environment quality," MPRA Paper 21754, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Carlo Carraro & Enrica De Cian & Massimo Tavoni, 2012. "Human Capital, Innovation, and Climate Policy: An Integrated Assessment," Working Papers 2012.18, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Carlo Carraro & Enrica De Cian & Massimo Tavoni, 2009. "Human capital formation and global warming mitigation: evidence from an integrated assessment model," Working Papers 2009_30, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    10. Karine Constant & Marion Davin, 2014. "Environmental Policy and Growth in a Model with Endogenous Environmental Awareness," AMSE Working Papers 1405, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France, revised Mar 2014.
    11. Junhong Qu & Xiaoli Hao, 2022. "Digital Economy, Financial Development, and Energy Poverty Based on Mediating Effects and a Spatial Autocorrelation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Constant, Karine & Davin, Marion, 2019. "Environmental Policy And Growth When Environmental Awareness Is Endogenous," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 1102-1136, April.
    14. Vella, Eugenia & Dioikitopoulos, Evangelos V. & Kalyvitis, Sarantis, 2015. "Green Spending Reforms, Growth, And Welfare With Endogenous Subjective Discounting," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1240-1260, September.
    15. Evangelos V. Dioikitopoulos & Sugata Ghosh & Eugenia Vella, 2016. "Technological Progress, Time Perception and Environmental Sustainability," Working Papers 2016002, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    16. Grimaud, André & Lafforgue, Gilles & Magné, Bertrand, 2011. "Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: A decentralized equilibrium analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 938-962.
    17. Cristian Mardones & Pablo Herreros, 2023. "Ex post evaluation of voluntary environmental policies on the energy intensity in Chilean firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9111-9136, September.
    18. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    19. Alfredo Marvão Pereira & Rui M. Pereira, 2012. "DGEP - A Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Portuguese Economy: Model Documentation," Working Papers 127, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
    20. Grimaud, André & Lafforgue, Gilles & Magné, Bertrand, 2007. "Innovation Markets in the Policy Appraisal of Climate Change Mitigation," IDEI Working Papers 481, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14134-:d:957299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.