IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13753-d951449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of the Entrepreneurial Initiative during a Pandemic: The Case of Plovdiv

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Nikolaeva Angelova

    (Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, “Paisii Hilendarski” Plovdiv University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Daniela Dobreva Pastarmadzhieva

    (Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, “Paisii Hilendarski” Plovdiv University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Aleksandar Tsvetanov Naydenov

    (Faculty of Applied Informatics and Statistics, University of National and World Economy, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is a trying time for both businesses and citizens. The measures and restrictions were devastating for the economy. As different countries had their strengths and challenges in dealing with the pandemic, there no unified approach applicable to every context. However, the entrepreneurial initiative is what boosts the economic development in each free market economy. The current paper’s goal is to evaluate how the pandemic affects entrepreneurial initiatives and to determine the degree to which three sets of elements influence these initiatives. The scope of the research is enterprises, working in the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, and the focus is the entrepreneurial initiative among them. The research with the enterprises is based only on a quantitative method—a survey across a representative sample of the general population of the enterprises whose headquarters are registered in the territory of the city of Plovdiv. The representative sample was selected as a random sample of 1000 companies (with an assumed response rate of about 10%), stratified by the size of the enterprise (number of employees) and by the field of economic activity. Statistical analysis was performed using the software product IBM SPSS version 26. The results show that the personal characteristics of the respondents are more relevant to the results rather than the specifics of the enterprise. The relevance of both work experience and ownership of the enterprise as preconditions that create opportunities for entrepreneurial initiatives during the global crisis offers a further empirical contribution. A key theoretical contribution of this study lies in finding evidence that innovativeness has a significant direct effect on behavioral intention to acquire new opportunities during crisis conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Nikolaeva Angelova & Daniela Dobreva Pastarmadzhieva & Aleksandar Tsvetanov Naydenov, 2022. "Determinants of the Entrepreneurial Initiative during a Pandemic: The Case of Plovdiv," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13753-:d:951449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olufemi Muibi Omisakin & Chris Arasanmi & Indrapriya Kularatne, 2022. "Proactiveness, environmental munificence and environmental hostility and their impacts on the growth of SMEs," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(1/2), pages 43-59.
    2. Mark Gertler & Simon Gilchrist, 1994. "Monetary Policy, Business Cycles, and the Behavior of Small Manufacturing Firms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 109(2), pages 309-340.
    3. Joern H. Block & Christian Fisch & Mirko Hirschmann, 2022. "The determinants of bootstrap financing in crises: evidence from entrepreneurial ventures in the COVID-19 pandemic," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 867-885, February.
    4. Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2022. "Psychological Features and Entrepreneurial Intention among Saudi Small Entrepreneurs during Adverse Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Jeffrey G. Covin & G.T. Lumpkin, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 855-872, September.
    6. Shu Meng & Xin Gao & Lianfeng Duan, 2022. "Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic and Developing a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Theory and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Policies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Jeffery S. McMullen & D. Ray Bagby & Leslie E. Palich, 2008. "Economic Freedom and the Motivation to Engage in Entrepreneurial Action," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(5), pages 875-895, September.
    8. Anica Hunjet & Ivana Radloviæ & Goran Kozina, 2021. "Entrepreneurship during the times of the coronavirus pandemic in Republic of Croatia," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 19(2), pages 227-238.
    9. Gentjan Çera & Edmond Çera & Humberto Nuno Rito Ribeiro & Sadik Maloku, 2021. "The role of trust in government and institutional environment in future business climate," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(5), pages 425-442.
    10. Karin Å irec & Dijana MoÄ nik, 2017. "The competitiveness of established entrepreneurs in Balkan countries," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2/3), pages 141-158.
    11. Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Mohani Abdul & Azmawani Abd Rahman & Mastora Yahya, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial characteristics, entrepreneurship education and intention to be entrepreneur amongst Malaysian undergraduates," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 46(2), pages 210-225.
    12. Abdullah Hamoud Ali Seraj & Syed Ali Fazal & Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Competency, Financial Literacy, and Sustainable Performance—Examining the Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Resilience among Saudi Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    13. repec:zna:indecs:v:19:y:2021:i:4:p:227-238 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Valentina Nikolova-Alexieva & Mina Nikolaeva Angelova, 2020. "Opportunities for raising the entrepreneurial culture - a factor for competitiveness of the Bulgarian economy," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(3), pages 373-398.
    15. Mohammad Ali Al Qudah, 2018. "The Impact of Entrepreneurship Initiatives in Enhancing Creativity and Innovation," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(7), pages 157-157, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iman Cheratian & Saleh Goltabar & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, 2023. "Firms persistence under sanctions: Micro‐level evidence from Iran," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 2408-2431, August.
    2. Jeffery S. McMullen & Katrina M. Brownell & Joel Adams, 2021. "What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1197-1238, September.
    3. Iman Cheratian & Saleh Goltabar & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, 2022. "Survival Strategies Under Sanctions: Firm-Level Evidence from Iran," Working Papers 1569, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Aug 2022.
    4. M. M. Sulphey & Martin Klepek, 2024. "A Study on the Antecedents of Individual Entrepreneurship Orientation of Female Students: An Examination Using Structural Equation Modeling," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    5. David Bruce Audretsch & Martina Aronica & Maksim Belitski & Davide Piacentino, 2024. "Natural selection or strategic adaptation? Entrepreneurial digital technologies and survival of the species," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1631-1659, October.
    6. Silvia Muzi & Filip Jolevski & Kohei Ueda & Domenico Viganola, 2023. "Productivity and firm exit during the COVID-19 crisis: cross-country evidence," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1719-1760, April.
    7. Syed Ali Fazal & Abdullah Al Mamun & Ali Saleh Alshebami & Rajennd Muniady & Mohd Helmi Ali & Sayed Samer Ali Al Shami & Salem Handhal Al Marri & Abdullah Hamoud Ali Seraj & Murad Thomran & Faiz Algob, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Motivation, Competency and Micro-Enterprise Sustainability Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    8. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    9. Finaldi Russo, Paolo & Nigro, Valentina & Pastorelli, Sabrina, 2024. "Bank lending to small firms: Metamorphosis of a financing model," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 13-31.
    10. Valérie Oheix & Dorothée Rivaud-Danset, 2009. "Why do firms borrow on a short-term basis ? Evidence from European countries," Working Papers hal-04140880, HAL.
    11. Koivu, Tuuli, 2008. "Has the Chinese economy become more sensitive to interest rates? : Studying credit demand in China," BOFIT Discussion Papers 1/2008, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    12. Sandra Eickmeier & Boris Hofmann & Andreas Worms, 2009. "Macroeconomic Fluctuations and Bank Lending: Evidence for Germany and the Euro Area," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(2), pages 193-223, May.
    13. Rakesh Sambharya & Martina Musteen, 2014. "Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 314-330, December.
    14. Duygan-Bump, Burcu & Levkov, Alexey & Montoriol-Garriga, Judit, 2015. "Financing constraints and unemployment: Evidence from the Great Recession," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 89-105.
    15. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis & Sahizer Samuk, 2020. "State business relations and the dynamics of job flows in Egypt and Turkey," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(4), pages 519-558, December.
    16. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    17. R. Sandra Schillo & Ajax Persaud & Meng Jin, 2016. "Entrepreneurial readiness in the context of national systems of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 619-637, April.
    18. Ingo Fender, 2000. "Corporate hedging: the impact of financial derivatives on the broad credit channel of monetary policy," BIS Working Papers 94, Bank for International Settlements.
    19. Castaño, María-Soledad & Méndez, María-Teresa & Galindo, Miguel-Ángel, 2015. "The effect of social, cultural, and economic factors on entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1496-1500.
    20. Christopher F Baum & Mustafa Caglayan & Bing Xu, 2017. "The Impact of Uncertainty on Financial Institutions," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 939, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 20 Sep 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13753-:d:951449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.