IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13654-d949564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination Mechanism of E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Social Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhong Qin

    (School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Shaojie Wang

    (School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Neng Gao

    (School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of social preference on the recycling decision and coordination in an E-closed-loop supply chain (E-CLSC). Firstly, we set the dynamic E-CLSC game model including a manufacturer, an E-commerce platform (E-platform) and a recycler, where the manufacturer dominates the supply chain and both the E-platform and the recycler are followers. Secondly, we propose an E-CLSC information structure to depict four symmetry and asymmetry cases about the E-platform’s fairness concern and the manufacturer’s altruistic reciprocity, and the backward induction method is adopted to solve the equilibrium in each case. By comparative analysis, we propose a revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contract to optimize recycling decisions, coordinate the E-CLSC and Pareto-improve all parties’ profits. We show that whether information is symmetrical or not, only the wholesale price contract cannot coordinate the E-CLSC, whereas the revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contract can always achieve optimal recycling decisions, coordinate the supply chain and Pareto-improve all parties’ profits with a constant cost sharing ratio. In addition, the E-platform’s fairness concern can widen the range of the revenue sharing ratio and make it easier to coordinate the E-CLSC, but the manufacturer’s altruistic reciprocity may narrow the range of the revenue sharing ratio and make it harder to coordinate the E-CLSC.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhong Qin & Shaojie Wang & Neng Gao, 2022. "Coordination Mechanism of E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Social Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13654-:d:949564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bassi, Matteo & Pagnozzi, Marco & Piccolo, Salvatore, 2014. "Optimal contracting with altruism and reciprocity," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 27-38.
    2. Peiyang Su & Ying Peng & Qidan Hu & Ruwen Tan, 2020. "Incentive Mechanism and Subsidy Design for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling under Information Asymmetry with Reciprocal Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-26, June.
    3. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Yang, Zhen & He, Zhengwen & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 155-166.
    4. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun & Chen, Ji, 2019. "Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 92-110.
    5. Christoph H. Loch & Yaozhong Wu, 2008. "Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(11), pages 1835-1849, November.
    6. Yadong Shu & Ying Dai & Zujun Ma, 2020. "Pricing Decisions in Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Competitive Fairness-Concerned Collectors," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, November.
    7. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Tony Haitao Cui & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2007. "Fairness and Channel Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1303-1314, August.
    9. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    10. Qiuxiang Li & Mengnan Shi & Yimin Huang, 2019. "A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jianxin & Hou, Rui & Xiao, Lu & Zhang, Tonghua & Zhou, Yongwu, 2023. "Dynamic corporate social responsibility adjustment strategies of a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns and supply chain financing," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Lyudmyla Starostyuk & Kay-Yut Chen & Edmund L. Prater, 2023. "Do looks matter in supply chain contracting? An experimental study," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 9-23, January.
    3. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yang, Feng, 2015. "Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 174-191.
    4. Becker-Peth, Michael & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2016. "Reference points in revenue sharing contracts—How to design optimal supply chain contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1033-1049.
    5. Qi Wang & Kebing Chen & Shengbin Wang & Xiaogang Cao, 2022. "Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 277-304, February.
    6. Kirshner, Samuel N. & Shao, Lusheng, 2018. "Internal and external reference effects in a two-tier supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 944-957.
    7. Wu, Diana Yan, 2013. "The impact of repeated interactions on supply chain contracts: A laboratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 3-15.
    8. Li, Zhong-Ping & Wang, Jian-Jun & Perera, Sandun & Shi, Jim (Junmin), 2022. "Coordination of a supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Elena Katok & Diana Yan Wu, 2009. "Contracting in Supply Chains: A Laboratory Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 1953-1968, December.
    10. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liu, Zhi & Jia, Fu & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Coordinating a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns through variable-weighted Shapley values," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 227-253.
    11. Niederhoff, Julie A & Kouvelis, Panos, 2019. "Effective and necessary: Individual supplier behavior in revenue sharing and wholesale contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1060-1071.
    12. Genhasi Ge & Daoping Wang & Mesumbe Bianca Epede, 2022. "Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Ilkyeong Moon & Yoon Jea Jeong & Subrata Saha, 2020. "Investment and coordination decisions in a supply chain of fresh agricultural products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2307-2331, December.
    14. Sarkar, Sumit & Bhala, Shrey, 2021. "Coordinating a closed loop supply chain with fairness concern by a constant wholesale price contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 140-156.
    15. Yinghao Zhang & Karen Donohue & Tony Haitao Cui, 2016. "Contract Preferences and Performance for the Loss-Averse Supplier: Buyback vs. Revenue Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1734-1754, June.
    16. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Jin, Mingzhou & Mao, Jiafu, 2021. "Decisions and coordination of retailer-led low-carbon supply chain under altruistic preference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 910-925.
    17. Zhibing Lin, 2019. "Price and location competition in supply chain with horizontal altruistic retailers," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 255-278, June.
    18. Xiaogang Ma & Chunyu Bao & Jizi Li & Wandong Lou, 2022. "The impact of dual fairness concerns on bargaining game and its dynamic system stability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 357-382, November.
    19. Xujin Pu & Lei Gong & Guanghua Han, 2019. "A feasible incentive contract between a manufacturer and his fairness-sensitive retailer engaged in strategic marketing efforts," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 193-206, January.
    20. Tony Haitao Cui & Guangwen Kong & Behrooz Pourghannad, 2020. "Is Simplicity the Ultimate Sophistication? The Superiority of Linear Pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1767-1788, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13654-:d:949564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.