IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13146-d941376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Waste Management Companies with Innovative Smart Solutions: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Farooq

    (Department of Management Sciences, Times Institute, Multan 60000, Pakistan)

  • Jie Cheng

    (School of International Education, Anhui Xinhua University, Hefei 230088, China)

  • Noor Ullah Khan

    (Malaysian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship and Business (MGSEB), University Malaysia Kelantan (UMK), Taman Bendahara, Pengkalan Chepa 16100, Malaysia
    Department of HRM, NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology H-12, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Roselina Ahmad Saufi

    (Malaysian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship and Business (MGSEB), University Malaysia Kelantan (UMK), Taman Bendahara, Pengkalan Chepa 16100, Malaysia)

  • Nagina Kanwal

    (Post Graduate Centre, Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Cyberjaya 63000, Malaysia)

  • Hanieh Alipour Bazkiaei

    (Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Business, University Malaysia Kelantan (UMK), Taman Bendahara, Pengkalan Chepa 16100, Malaysia)

Abstract

Overflowing garbage bins and unnecessary truck visits to collect waste have always been core issues of sustainability and maintaining a green environment. In the recent past, a transition has been observed in waste management towards a better environment and the achievement of sustainability goals. Companies are not only focused on producing less but also transforming waste into energy and reusable products. This transition process needs to evolve through sustainable solutions and innovative marketing initiatives that increase awareness and education among end users. This study used a systematic literature review protocol to identify and review the available research on sustainable waste-management solutions, innovative marketing initiatives, and a proposed conceptual model. It analyzed the latest literature from 1976 to 2022 to assess waste-management trends using the Web of Sciences and Scopus databases. To evaluate the practical perspective, this study analyzed ten waste-management companies offering services in the USA, the UK, Korea, Finland, Ireland, Turkey, Brazil, Slovakia, Portugal, Denmark, and Canada to assess their technological and marketing development for the creation of a better future. It was found that Ecube, Enevo, smart bins, Compology, Bigbelly, Sensoneo, Citibrain, ACO recycling, Evrek, Rico, and BrighterBins focus more on technology and less on user awareness and marketing. There is minimal focus on education and empowerment of end users. Our study’s findings guide academics, practitioners, and policymakers to apply ambidextrousness in energy innovation, particularly in the waste-management sector. By implementing sustainable and innovative solutions, companies can not only reduce waste products, but they can also recover, recycle, and better dispose of the waste. However, to do so, companies also need to educate end users.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Farooq & Jie Cheng & Noor Ullah Khan & Roselina Ahmad Saufi & Nagina Kanwal & Hanieh Alipour Bazkiaei, 2022. "Sustainable Waste Management Companies with Innovative Smart Solutions: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13146-:d:941376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fourberg, Niklas & Korff, Alex, 2020. "Fiber vs. vectoring: Limiting technology choices in broadband expansion," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    2. Pedro Alexandre Marques & André M. Carvalho & José Oliveira Santos, 2021. "Improving Operational and Sustainability Performance in a Retail Fresh Food Market Using Lean: A Portuguese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Brennan, Liam & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Biofuels from microalgae--A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 557-577, February.
    4. Ahmad, Nisar & Aghdam, Reza FathollahZadeh & Butt, Irfan & Naveed, Amjad, 2020. "Citation-based systematic literature review of energy-growth nexus: An overview of the field and content analysis of the top 50 influential papers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Fourberg, Niklas & Korff, Alex, 2020. "Fiber vs. vectoring: Limiting technology choices in broadband expansion," DICE Discussion Papers 334, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    6. Menegaki, Angeliki N. & Ahmad, Nisar & Aghdam, Reza FathollahZadeh & Naz, Amber, 2021. "The convergence in various dimensions of energy-economy-environment linkages: A comprehensive citation-based systematic literature review," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Biswas, Amit K. & Farzanegan, Mohammad Reza & Thum, Marcel, 2012. "Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: Theory and evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 114-125.
    8. Louise R. Manfredi & Meriel Stokoe & Rebecca Kelly & Seyeon Lee, 2021. "Teaching Sustainable Responsibility through Informal Undergraduate Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Noor Ullah Khan & Haoqiang Wei & Guiling Yue & Nabila Nazir & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2021. "Exploring Themes of Sustainable Practices in Manufacturing Industry: Using Thematic Networks Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Dorin Vicentiu Popescu & Adriana Dima & Elena Radu & Ecaterina Milica Dobrota & Victor Marian Dumitrache, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Green Deal Policies in the Food Chain," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(60), pages 410-410, April.
    11. Adriana Dima & Alexandru-Mihai Bugheanu & Ruxandra Dinulescu & Ana-Madalina Potcovaru & Constanta Alice Stefanescu & Irinel Marin, 2022. "Exploring the Research Regarding Frugal Innovation and Business Sustainability through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-36, January.
    12. Chindu Chandran & Prodyut Bhattacharya, 2019. "Hotel’s best practices as strategic drivers for environmental sustainability and green marketing," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 218-233, April.
    13. Suhong Li & Thomas Ngniatedema & Fang Chen, 2017. "Understanding the Impact of Green Initiatives and Green Performance on Financial Performance in the US," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 776-790, September.
    14. Steffen, Bjarne, 2020. "Estimating the cost of capital for renewable energy projects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soesilo, Nining Indroyono & Alfarizi, Muhammad, 2024. "Psycho-social conditions of urban communities in the complexity of waste management: Are awareness and waste banks the main solution?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Deniz Yalçıntaş & Suzan Oğuz & Eda Yaşa Özeltürkay & Murat Gülmez, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Sustainable Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. MESHACK Siwandeti & LETICIA Mahuwi & BARAKA Israel, 2023. "HOW PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CAN HELP SOCIETIES ACHIEVE SDGs: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 15(1), pages 36-46, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionisios Koutsantonis & Konstantinos Koutsantonis & Nikolaos P. Bakas & Vagelis Plevris & Andreas Langousis & Savvas A. Chatzichristofis, 2022. "Bibliometric Literature Review of Adaptive Learning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Angélica Ochoa-Díaz, 2022. "What Are the Topics That Business Ecosystems Navigate? Updating of Scientific Activity and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Zoz, Konrad & Zuloaga, Gonzalo & Kulenkampff, Gabriele & Plückebaum, Thomas & Ockenfels, Martin, 2022. "Costs of very high capacity networks and geographic heterogeneity – a statistical assessment for Germany," WIK Working Papers 4, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH, Bad Honnef.
    4. Hussain, Syed Mujahid & Ahmad, Nisar & Ahmed, Sheraz, 2023. "Applications of high-frequency data in finance: A bibliometric literature review," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Carlo Dindorf & Eva Bartaguiz & Freya Gassmann & Michael Fröhlich, 2022. "Conceptual Structure and Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Research in Sports: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Chanin Yoopetch & Suthep Nimsai & Boonying Kongarchapatara, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Sen Li & Yingying Shi & Lingling Wang & Enjun Xia, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Brand Orientation Strategy in Digital Marketing: Determinants, Research Perspectives and Evolutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Junjie Li & Guohui Zhan & Xin Dai & Meng Qi & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Innovation and Optimization Logic of Grassroots Digital Governance in China under Digital Empowerment and Digital Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    9. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Issam Hanafi & Bousselham Samoudi & Ahlem Ben Halima & Laurent Canale, 2022. "Hotspots and Tendencies of Energy Optimization Based on Bibliometric Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Kjetil Bjorvatn & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, 2014. "Resource Rents, Power, and Political Stability," CESifo Working Paper Series 4727, CESifo.
    12. Behnam Tabatabai & Afua Adusei & Alok Kumar Shrivastava & Prashant Kumar Singh & Viji Sitther, 2020. "Nitrogen Deprivation in Fremyella diplosiphon Augments Lipid Production without Affecting Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    13. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Kalpesh K. Sharma & Holger Schuhmann & Peer M. Schenk, 2012. "High Lipid Induction in Microalgae for Biodiesel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Baral, Nabin & Rabotyagov, Sergey, 2017. "How much are wood-based cellulosic biofuels worth in the Pacific Northwest? Ex-ante and ex-post analysis of local people's willingness to pay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 99-106.
    16. Atadashi, I.M. & Aroua, M.K. & Abdul Aziz, A.R. & Sulaiman, N.M.N., 2011. "Membrane biodiesel production and refining technology: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 5051-5062.
    17. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    18. Xingwei Li & Jingru Li & Yicheng Huang & Jinrong He & Xiang Liu & Jiachi Dai & Qiong Shen, 2022. "Construction enterprises’ adoption of green development behaviors: an agent-based modeling approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    20. Duan, Pei-Gao & Yang, Shi-Kun & Xu, Yu-Ping & Wang, Feng & Zhao, Dan & Weng, Yu-Jing & Shi, Xian-Lei, 2018. "Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and supercritical water gasification for improvement of energy recovery from algal biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 734-745.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13146-:d:941376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.