IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p530-d717504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Forest Engineering Students’ Attitudes towards Their Education and Future Jobs: Case Results from Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Seçil Yurdakul Erol

    (Department of Forest Policy and Administration, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34473, Turkey)

Abstract

Forestry is a complex multidimensional discipline that implies a broad job description and task variety for forest engineers. Thus, the scope of professional forestry education is expanding and diversifying. It is essential to determine the students’ attitudes towards their education and future jobs to develop focused solutions in forestry education. In this context, the present study aims to analyze the attitudes of forest engineering students towards their education and future jobs. This study evaluated and compared the students’ attitudes over a 10-year period through questionnaires administered to senior forest engineering students of the Faculty of Forestry at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa (IUC). It was revealed that, during job selection, non-job factors (39.5%) were nearly as influential as job-related factors (53.7%). Moreover, students’ career plans were based mainly on working in public institutions (41.4%) and simply doing their job (78.1%). The results showed that students’ views on education have improved over time; however, they have doubts about their readiness to succeed in their careers (M = 3.41) and the adequacy of their knowledge and experience level (M = 2.95). Their attitudes on their future job were not wholly positive: They have doubts about finding a job (M = 2.90), having satisfactory working conditions (M = 3.38), and income (M = 3.57). The results of this study can support decision-making in forest education and human resources in forestry.

Suggested Citation

  • Seçil Yurdakul Erol, 2022. "Comparison of Forest Engineering Students’ Attitudes towards Their Education and Future Jobs: Case Results from Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:530-:d:717504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carvalho Mendes, Americo M.S., 2006. "Implementation analysis of forest programmes: Some theoretical notes and an example," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 512-528, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tikkanen, Jukka, 2018. "Participatory turn - and down-turn - in Finland's regional forest programme process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 87-97.
    2. Rita Serra & Eugénia Rodrigues & Raúl García-Barrios, 2017. "Mushrooming Communities: A Field Guide to Mycology in the Community Forests of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Van Gossum, Peter & Ledene, Liselot & Arts, Bas & De Vreese, Rik & Verheyen, Kris, 2008. "Implementation failure of the forest expansion policy in Flanders (Northern Belgium) and the policy learning potential," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(7-8), pages 515-522, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:530-:d:717504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.