IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12724-d935010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Efficiency Evaluation, Spatial Difference, and Trend Analysis of Logistics Industry and Manufacturing Industry Linkage in the Northeast Old Industrial Base

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Wu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guizhou 550025, China)

  • Jiahua Gan

    (Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Zhuo Jiang

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Anding Jiang

    (Department of Low Carbon Research Center, Shaanxi Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Wenlong Zheng

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

The ecological efficiency of industrial linkage considering unexpected output is an important indicator to measure the coordinated development of industrial linkage, resources, and the environment. It is an important basis for realizing the sustainable development of industry linkage. Taking the composite index of carbon emissions of the logistics industry and pollution emissions of the manufacturing industry as the unexpected output, we used the unexpected SBM model to evaluate the ecological efficiency of industrial linkage between the logistics industry and the manufacturing industry in Northeast China from 2011 to 2019, and used the spatial autocorrelation analysis method to analyze the spatial differences in industrial linkage efficiency. The results show that (1) considering the unexpected output, in Northeast China, the ecological efficiency cannot reach a high level of linkage development stage. (2) The results of the spatial correlation show that there are spatial differences between H-H agglomeration and L-L agglomeration in the linkage ecological efficiency of the two industries, and the spatial agglomeration attribute is relatively stable. (3) The analysis results of spatial agglomeration characteristics show that the spatial agglomeration of the two industries has a spatial evolution process from the southern coastal area to the central region. (4) Spatial trend analysis shows that in Northeast China, the western region is slightly higher than the eastern region, while the southern region is higher than the northern region. (5) From the development trend of linkage ecological efficiency, the linkage ecological efficiency of the study area will be improved in the future, but in the short term, the linkage ecological development level is not high and may still be at the primary linkage level.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Wu & Jiahua Gan & Zhuo Jiang & Anding Jiang & Wenlong Zheng, 2022. "Ecological Efficiency Evaluation, Spatial Difference, and Trend Analysis of Logistics Industry and Manufacturing Industry Linkage in the Northeast Old Industrial Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12724-:d:935010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jingwen Yi & Yuchen Zhang & Kaicheng Liao, 2021. "Regional Differential Decomposition and Formation Mechanism of Dynamic Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Logistics Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Wenzhu Liao & Tong Wang, 2019. "A Novel Collaborative Optimization Model for Job Shop Production–Delivery Considering Time Window and Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Hao Zhang & Jianxin You & Xuekelaiti Haiyirete & Tianyu Zhang, 2020. "Measuring Logistics Efficiency in China Considering Technology Heterogeneity and Carbon Emission through a Meta-Frontier Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Qiang Han & Yuyan Wang, 2018. "Decision and Coordination in a Low-Carbon E-Supply Chain Considering the Manufacturer’s Carbon Emission Reduction Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Xiong Gao & Yuhong Wang, 2019. "Study on Benefit Coordination of Supply Chain Network Based on Green Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    9. Shaobo Wu & Xun Yao & Guangdong Wu, 2020. "Environmental Investment Decision of Green Supply Chain considering the Green Uncertainty," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-13, November.
    10. Xu Zhang & Fei-Yu Jin & Xu-Mei Yuan & Hai-Yan Zhang, 2021. "Low-Carbon Multimodal Transportation Path Optimization under Dual Uncertainty of Demand and Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Camila Gramkow & Annela Anger-Kraavi, 2019. "Developing Green: A Case for the Brazilian Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Xiaohong Jiang & Jianxiao Ma & Huizhe Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Zhaoguo Huang, 2020. "Evaluating the Carbon Emissions Efficiency of the Logistics Industry Based on a Super-SBM Model and the Malmquist Index from a Strong Transportation Strategy Perspective in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Changhong Li & Jialuo Wang & Jiao Zheng & Jiani Gao, 2022. "Effects of Carbon Policy on Carbon Emission Reduction in Supply Chain under Uncertain Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Fan Liu & Han Xu, 2020. "Heterogeneity of Green TFP in China’s Logistics Industry under Environmental Constraints," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-12, November.
    15. Daozhi Zhao & Jiaqin Hao & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Three-Player for Low-Carbon Production Capacity Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Petchprakai Sirilertsuwan & Sébastien Thomassey & Xianyi Zeng, 2020. "A Strategic Location Decision-Making Approach for Multi-Tier Supply Chain Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-37, October.
    17. Cheng Qian & Shenghui Wang & Xiaohong Liu & Xueying Zhang, 2019. "Low-Carbon Initiatives of Logistics Service Providers: The Perspective of Supply Chain Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Yanhong Yuan & Bowen Zhang & Lei Wang & Li Wang, 2022. "Low-Carbon Strategies Considering Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Based on Carbon Trading and Carbon Reduction Technology Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Lei Yang & Yiji Cai & Xiaozhe Zhong & Yongqiang Shi & Zhiyong Zhang, 2017. "A Carbon Emission Evaluation for an Integrated Logistics System—A Case Study of the Port of Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Fan Yang & Yanming Sun & Yuan Zhang & Tao Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Manufacturing Industry Transformation and Upgrading: A Case Study of Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.
    21. Yuan, Huaxi & Feng, Yidai & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Cen, Yan, 2020. "How does manufacturing agglomeration affect green economic efficiency?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    22. Robert Bucki & Petr Suchánek, 2017. "Modelling Decision-Making Processes in the Management Support of the Manufacturing Element in the Logistic Supply Chain," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, June.
    23. Sijing Liu & Jiuping Xu & Xiaoyuan Shi & Guoqi Li & Dinglong Liu, 2018. "Sustainable Distribution Organization Based on the Supply–Demand Coordination in Large Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    24. Kena Mi & Rulong Zhuang, 2022. "Producer Services Agglomeration and Carbon Emission Reduction—An Empirical Test Based on Panel Data from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    25. Holger Scheel & Stefan Scholtes, 2003. "Continuity of DEA Efficiency Measures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 149-159, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heping Ding & Yuxia Guo & Xue Wu & Cui Wang & Yu Zhang & Hongjun Liu & Yujia Liu & Aiyong Lin & Fagang Hu, 2022. "Data-Driven Resource Efficiency Evaluation and Improvement of the Logistics Industry in 30 Chinese Provinces and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Lingzhang Kong & Jinye Li, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Vicente J. Bolós & Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano, 2023. "Continuous models combining slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 363-391, June.
    6. Yuanyuan Wu & Zhanhua Jia & Tingting Yu, 2022. "Tourism and Green Development: Analysis of Linear and Non-Linear Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Yu, Binbin & Zhou, Xinru, 2023. "Urban administrative hierarchy and urban land use efficiency: Evidence from Chinese cities," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 178-195.
    8. Bangjun Wang & Yu Tian, 2023. "Green and Low-Carbon Efficiency Assessment of Urban Agglomeration Logistics Industry: Evidence from China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Area (2008–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Chauhan, Chetna & Kaur, Puneet & Arrawatia, Rakesh & Ractham, Peter & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Supply chain collaboration and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Teamwork makes achieving SDGs dream work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 290-307.
    10. Yan, Xiaolei & He, Taiyi & Qian, Pengcheng & Liu, Zhongwen, 2024. "Does the construction of Pilot Free Trade Zones promote the development of green economy? - A quasi-natural experiment evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 208-224.
    11. Ran Feng & Xiaoe Qu, 2023. "Innovation-Driven Industrial Agglomeration Impact on Green Economic Growth in the Yellow River Basin: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Yaoshan Ma & Qingyu Yao, 2022. "Impact of Producer Service Agglomeration on Carbon Emission Efficiency and Its Mechanism: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Xiaotong Wang & Gongli Luo & Lu Wang, 2024. "Analysis of Green Economic Efficiency and Influencing Factors: Based on the Innovation Output and Spatial Spillover Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15161-15175, September.
    14. Xu, Jin-Jin & Wang, Hai-Jie & Tang, Kai, 2022. "The sustainability of industrial structure on green eco-efficiency in the Yellow River Basin," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 775-788.
    15. Rui Li & Yali Chen & Jinzhao Song & Ming Li & Yu Yu, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization Method of Industrial Workshop Layout from the Perspective of Low Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Ashrafi, Ali & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Lee, Lai Soon & Lee, Chew Ging, 2013. "The efficiency of the hotel industry in Singapore," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 31-34.
    17. Büschken, Joachim, 2009. "When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 647-657, January.
    18. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Ke Liu & Yurong Qiao & Qian Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of China’s Industrial Green Development Efficiency and Driving Factors: Research Based on MGWR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Xiao Zhang & Di Wang, 2023. "Beyond the Ecological Boundary: A Quasi-Natural Experiment on the Impact of National Marine Parks on Eco-Efficiency in Coastal Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12724-:d:935010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.