IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12701-d934579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Street Layout of Melbourne’s Chinatown as an Urban Heritage Precinct in a Grid System Using Space Syntax Methods and Field Observation

Author

Listed:
  • Shiran Geng

    (College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
    Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Hing-Wah Chau

    (College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
    Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Elmira Jamei

    (College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
    Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Zora Vrcelj

    (College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
    Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

Abstract

Melbourne’s Chinatown is the oldest in Australia. A large amount of research on this unique ethnic enclave has been conducted to elucidate its formation history, heritage significance, cultural influence and architectural features. However, the discussion of the precinct’s spatial characteristics remains mostly marginalised. As a heritage precinct in the centre of an urban grid form, the precinct offers a unique spatial experience to its visitors. To better fathom the street layout of the area, three objectives are addressed in this study, including understanding: (1) the precinct’s street network in the grid system, (2) the visibility relationship within the precinct and (3) the relationship between buildings and streets. A joint methodology framework is established to fulfil the research objectives by incorporating space syntax methods and field observation. The findings facilitate policymakers and planners in understanding the precinct’s unique street layout and making relevant preservation decisions. Further studies are encouraged to scrutinise other spatial and urban characteristics of the precinct and test the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiran Geng & Hing-Wah Chau & Elmira Jamei & Zora Vrcelj, 2022. "Understanding the Street Layout of Melbourne’s Chinatown as an Urban Heritage Precinct in a Grid System Using Space Syntax Methods and Field Observation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12701-:d:934579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kayvan Karimi, 2018. "Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-4, January.
    2. Elek Pafka & Kim Dovey & Gideon DPA Aschwanden, 2020. "Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 508-522, March.
    3. Shilpi Tewari & David Beynon, 2018. "Changing neighbourhood character in Melbourne: point Cook a case study," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 456-464, May.
    4. Kim Dovey & Simon Wollan & Ian Woodcock, 2012. "Placing Graffiti: Creating and Contesting Character in Inner-city Melbourne," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 21-41.
    5. Claudia Yamu & Akkelies van Nes & Chiara Garau, 2021. "Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Peng & Hui Qiu & Xinlu Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Spatial Functions on the Public Space System of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He, 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Isabelle Soares & Claudia Yamu & Gerd Weitkamp, 2020. "The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Peng Dai & Song Han & Guannan Fu & Hui Fu & Yanjun Wang, 2023. "Optimization Path of Metro Commercial Passageway Based on Computational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Raquel Agost-Felip & María José Ruá & Fatiha Kouidmi, 2021. "An Inclusive Model for Assessing Age-Friendly Urban Environments in Vulnerable Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Lamprecht Mariusz, 2022. "Space syntax as a socio-economic approach: a review of potentials in the polish context," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 5-14, January.
    9. Ran Li & Liang Mao, 2022. "Spatial Characteristics of Suburban Villages Based on Spatial Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Elena Cantatore & Dario Esposito & Alberico Sonnessa, 2023. "Mapping the Multi-Vulnerabilities of Outdoor Places to Enhance the Resilience of Historic Urban Districts: The Case of the Apulian Region Exposed to Slow and Rapid-Onset Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Jan Maňas, 2023. "Identification of Local Accessibility Hubs and Leisure Amenities in Suburbanized Settlements: Case Study on the Suburban Zone of Prague," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    12. Miza Moreau, 2024. "In/formal reappropriations: Spatialised needs and desires in residential alleys in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1031-1048, May.
    13. Walid-Mahfoud Djenaihi & Noureddine Zemmouri & Moussadek Djenane & Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Noise and Spatial Configuration in Biskra, Algeria—A Space Syntax Approach to Understand the Built Environment for Visually Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Zijie Zhou & Xin Zheng, 2022. "A Cultural Route Perspective on Rural Revitalization of Traditional Villages: A Case Study from Chishui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Chunyan Yang & Song Shi & Goran Runeson, 2022. "Associations between Community Parks and Social Interactions in Master-Planned Estates in Sydney, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Tara Azad Rauof, 2023. "Assessing Established Residential Compounds between Regulation and Reality Utilizing Space Syntax Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Chen Weng & Jingyi Wang & Chunming Li & Rencai Dong & Chencan Lv & Yaran Jiao & Yonglin Zhang, 2022. "Recreational Green Space Service in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area: A Multiple Travel Modes Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Shaobo Zhou & Xiaodong Zang & Junheng Yang & Wanying Chen & Jiahao Li & Shuyi Chen, 2023. "Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Spatial Configurations and Walkability Potentials. Measuring Urban Compactness with Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Indraja Germanaite & Kestutis Zaleckis & Rimantas Butleris, 2022. "SPDIAM: Methodology for Describing and Solving Spatial Problems in Territorial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12701-:d:934579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.