IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12467-d930295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sulphate Removal in Industrial Effluents Using Electrocoagulation Sludge as an Adsorbent

Author

Listed:
  • Siyanda Yamba

    (Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 170111, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa
    Buffalo City Metro Municipality, Scientific Services, No. 1 Reservoir Road, Selbone, East London 5201, South Africa)

  • Nomso C. Hintsho-Mbita

    (Department of Chemistry, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

  • Tunde L. Yusuf

    (Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 170111, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa)

  • Richard Moutloali

    (Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 170111, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa
    Department of Science and Technology, Mintek-Nanotechnology Innovation Centre, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Nonhlangabezo Mabuba

    (Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 170111, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa)

Abstract

The high concentration of sulphates is detrimental to the infrastructure of wastewater treatment plants. Hence in this study, we present the application of electrocoagulation sludge as an adsorbent to remove sulphates from industrial effluents before they are released back to the environment. The sludge contains iron and aluminium cations and cationic complexes that precipitate sulphates in water. Corrugated iron sheet was used as a sacrificial electrode during electrocoagulation (EC) to generate sludge. FTIR, XRD, SEM, TEM, and Zeta Potential were used to characterize the sludge. The following parameters: contact time, pH, initial concentration, and adsorbent dosage were optimized to 120 min, 2, 100 mg/L and 150 mg, respectively. For the synthetic water, the sulphate removal was 99.1%, whereas for the real water it was found to be 98.7%. The adsorption capacity of the EC sludge was 66.76% for 2 h under acidic conditions. The Langmuir isotherm fitted better than the Freundlich isotherm. This confirmed the homogenous distribution of the active sites on the EC sludge. At different EC’s sludge, the pseudo-second order kinetic model produced the best fitting experimental results which confirmed the removal of sulphate ions by chemisorption. This approach (method) is useful for purifying industrial effluents before they are discharged into the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyanda Yamba & Nomso C. Hintsho-Mbita & Tunde L. Yusuf & Richard Moutloali & Nonhlangabezo Mabuba, 2022. "Sulphate Removal in Industrial Effluents Using Electrocoagulation Sludge as an Adsorbent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12467-:d:930295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Godfrey & Suzan Oelofse, 2017. "Historical Review of Waste Management and Recycling in South Africa," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Iqbal & Abdullah Yasar & Abdul-Sattar Nizami & Rafia Haider & Faiza Sharif & Imran Ali Sultan & Amtul Bari Tabinda & Aman Anwer Kedwaii & Muhammad Murtaza Chaudhary, 2022. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Haulage Modeling Design for Lahore, Pakistan: Transition toward Sustainability and Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-39, December.
    2. Giovanni Vinti & Valerie Bauza & Thomas Clasen & Kate Medlicott & Terry Tudor & Christian Zurbrügg & Mentore Vaccari, 2021. "Municipal Solid Waste Management and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Güner, Mehmet Oğuz & Kural, Orhan, 2024. "Effects of EU-Compliant mining waste regulation on Turkish mining sector: A review of characterization, classification, storage, management, recovery of mineral wastes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Felix Made & Vusi Ntlebi & Tahira Kootbodien & Kerry Wilson & Nonhlanhla Tlotleng & Angela Mathee & Mpume Ndaba & Spo Kgalamono & Nisha Naicker, 2020. "Illness, Self-Rated Health and Access to Medical Care among Waste Pickers in Landfill Sites in Johannesburg, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-10, March.
    5. Dorothea Christina Schoeman & Isaac Tebogo Rampedi, 2022. "Drivers of Household Recycling Behavior in the City of Johannesburg, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Rafael Ziegler & Cynthia Poirier & Marie Lacasse & Evan Murray, 2023. "Circular Economy and Cooperatives—An Exploratory Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Iuliia Plastinina & Lyudmila Teslyuk & Nataliya Dukmasova & Elena Pikalova, 2019. "Implementation of Circular Economy Principles in Regional Solid Municipal Waste Management: The Case of Sverdlovskaya Oblast (Russian Federation)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Tariro Shiri & Nonso E. Nnolim & Uchechukwu U. Nwodo, 2023. "Delipidation of Chicken Feathers by Lipolytic Bacillus Species Isolated from River-Borne Sediments," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Ntobeko Mlotshwa & Tanya Dayaram & Asiphile Khanyile & Princess A. Sibanda & Kira Erwin & Tamlynn Fleetwood, 2022. "Working with Waste: Hazards and Mitigation Strategies Used by Waste Pickers in the Inner City of Durban," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12467-:d:930295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.