IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12255-d926815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Different Carrier Materials on the Growth and Yield of Spinach under Pot and Field Experimental Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Hira Safdar

    (Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan)

  • Moazzam Jamil

    (Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan)

  • Azhar Hussain

    (Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan)

  • Bedur Faleh A. Albalawi

    (Department of Biology, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia)

  • Allah Ditta

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal, Upper Dir 18000, Pakistan
    School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Abubakar Dar

    (Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan)

  • Ayesha Aimen

    (Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan)

  • Hafiz Tanvir Ahmad

    (Provincial Reference Fertilizer Testing Laboratory, Raiwind, Lahore 55150, Pakistan)

  • Qudsia Nazir

    (Soil Chemistry Section, Ayub Agriculture Research Institute, Faisalabad 38850, Pakistan)

  • Maqshoof Ahmad

    (Department of Soil Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan)

Abstract

Long-term use of chemical fertilizers is affecting the environment, soil quality, and biodiversity. Organic agriculture is gaining global attention by using microbial-based biofertilizers. Carriers protect microbes by providing nutrition, energy, and suitable conditions for their survival while entering the natural environments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of different carrier materials to enhance the yield and the quality of spinach and to select the best carrier material for spinach biofertilizer. Three pre-isolated and characterized bacterial strains (AN-35, ZM-27, and ZM-63) were tested for their compatibility and used in this experiment through seed inoculation with organic carriers, i.e., compost, peat, press mud, biochar, and charcoal. A pot experiment and a field experiment were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different organic carriers. The results of the pot study showed a significant increase in spinach growth, i.e., shoot length (25%), shoot fresh weight (24%), root length (25%), and root fresh weight (29%), spinach nutrition, i.e., nitrogen (18%), phosphorus (22%), potassium (15%), iron (17%), and zinc (14%), spinach physiology, i.e., relative water content (27%), chlorophyll content (9%), and the membrane stability index (28%) under peat coated treatments with 24% more soil microbial populations compared to the control. Similarly, in the field experiment, peat coating significantly enhanced spinach growth, i.e., shoot length (29%), shoot fresh weight (23%), root length (16%), and root fresh weight (24.7%), spinach nutrition, i.e., nitrogen (16%), phosphorus (19%), potassium (15%), iron (17%), and zinc (23%), spinach physiology, i.e., relative water content (28%), chlorophyll content (13%) and the membrane stability index (32%), and spinach yield per hectare (30%), as well as producing 20% higher soil microbial populations. From these results, it is concluded that peat is a good carrier material for biofertilizer production as it not only enhances crop production but also the microbial number, in addition to improving soil quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hira Safdar & Moazzam Jamil & Azhar Hussain & Bedur Faleh A. Albalawi & Allah Ditta & Abubakar Dar & Ayesha Aimen & Hafiz Tanvir Ahmad & Qudsia Nazir & Maqshoof Ahmad, 2022. "The Effect of Different Carrier Materials on the Growth and Yield of Spinach under Pot and Field Experimental Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12255-:d:926815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nur Okur, 2018. "A Review- Bio-Fertilizers- Power of Beneficial Microorganisms in Soils," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 4(4), pages 4028-4029, May.
    2. Becky Nancy Aloo & Ernest Rashid Mbega & Billy Amendi Makumba & John Baptist Tumuhairwe, 2022. "Effects of Carrier Materials and Storage Temperatures on the Viability and Stability of Three Biofertilizer Inoculants Obtained from Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Rhizosphere," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Hafiz Muhammad Rashad Javeed & Mazhar Ali & Imtiaz Ahmed & Xiukang Wang & Ibrahim Al-Ashkar & Rafi Qamar & Abdullah Ibrahim & Muhammad Habib-Ur-Rahman & Allah Ditta & Ayman EL Sabagh, 2021. "Biochar Enriched with Buffalo Slurry Improved Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Dynamics, Nutrient Uptake and Growth Attributes of Wheat by Reducing Leaching Losses of Nutrients," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong Huang & Bing Li & Yulan Chen & Qi Tao & Qiang Xu & Denghong Wen & Xuesong Gao & Qiquan Li & Xiaoyan Tang & Changquan Wang, 2022. "Biochar Application Increases Labile Carbon and Inorganic Nitrogen Supply in a Continuous Monocropping Soil," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Tao Song & Chao Huang & Hui Yang & Jianhong Liang & Yiqi Ma & Can Xu & Mingbao Li & Xiang Liu & Liankai Zhang, 2022. "Characterization of Soil-Plant Leaf Nutrient Elements and Key Factors Affecting Mangoes in Karst Areas of Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12255-:d:926815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.