IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12159-d925631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Special Sacrifice and Determination of Compensation Standard for Land Expropriation in the Urbanization Process—A Perspective of Legal Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Wei You

    (Law School, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Tianyu Dai

    (Law School, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Wuqing Du

    (Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
    Law School, University of California, 2763 Bancroft Way, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Jiabai Chen

    (Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

In the current context of rapid global urbanization, China’s urbanization is also accelerating, and the rational planning and sustainable use of state land and space have become a growing concern. The expansion of urban geographic space is inevitably accompanied by the massive expropriation of rural land. The research objective of this article is to explore, from a jurisprudence perspective, under what circumstances land expropriation in urbanization has caused special sacrifices to farmers and what compensation standards have been determined by the Chinese courts after the special sacrifices have been caused. To achieve this research objective, the authors first identified the causal relation between the expansion of urbanization and conflicts over land expropriation in China through the empirical analysis method, and found that the expansion of urban geographic space has led to an increase in conflicts over land expropriation and that the land expropriation compensation system is the key to alleviating such conflicts. Secondly, by interpreting and summarizing the compensation standards for land expropriation in China’s legislation texts and judicial judgments through normative analysis, this article finds that the compensation standards for land expropriation currently adopted by the people’s courts of China are pluralistic and conflict with those in the legislation text. This article concludes that if land expropriation in urbanization leads to an infringement of civil liberties which results in a special sacrifice of citizens, such special sacrifice should be justly compensated. To effectively mitigate the conflicts concerning land expropriation in the urbanization process, China should build a unified compensation standard for land expropriation under the guidance of legislative text in the future, achieve a reconciliation between the doctrinal and practical compensation standards for land expropriation, and support the rule of law to guarantee the sustainable development of urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei You & Tianyu Dai & Wuqing Du & Jiabai Chen, 2022. "Special Sacrifice and Determination of Compensation Standard for Land Expropriation in the Urbanization Process—A Perspective of Legal Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12159-:d:925631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tilahun Dires & Derjew Fentie & Yeneneh Hunie & Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Assessing the Impacts of Expropriation and Compensation on Livelihood of Farmers: The Case of Peri-Urban Debre Markos, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Chenxi Li & Jingyao Wu & Zenglei Xi & Weiqiang Zhang, 2021. "Farmers’ Satisfaction with Land Expropriation System Reform: A Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liliang You, 2023. "Theories behind Change of Land Expropriation Institutions in Cross-Strait: An Analysis from Historical Institutionalism Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Ilya Zelenskiy & Danila Parygin & Oksana Savina & Alexey Finogeev & Alexander Gurtyakov, 2022. "Effective Implementation of Integrated Area Development Based on Consumer Attractiveness Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Wang & Dengjiao Liao & Bin Yan & Xinhai Lu, 2023. "Employment of Land-Expropriated Farmers: The Effects of Land Expropriation and Gender Difference," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Yeneneh Hunie & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Evaluating Institutional Dichotomy between Urban and Rural Land Administration in Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Aradhna Aggarwal & Ankita Garg, 2024. "Socioeconomic Effects of Land Use Change for Industrialization: Evidence-Informed Learnings from Sri City India," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Fituma Lemessa & Belay Simane & Aseffa Seyoum & Girma Gebresenbet, 2023. "Development-Induced Impacts on the Livelihoods of Displaced Communities: The Case of Bole Lemi Industry Park, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger & Moges Wubet Shita & Derjew Fentie Nurie & Ayelech Kidie Mengesha, 2024. "Land Rental Transactions in Ethiopian Peri-Urban Areas: Sex and Other Factors for Land Rent Transactions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Rugema, Didier Milindi & Birhanu, Tadesse Amsalu & Shibeshi, Gebeyehu Belay, 2022. "Analysing land policy processes with stages model: Land policy cases of Ethiopia and Rwanda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12159-:d:925631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.