IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12115-d924585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Psychological Distance on the Challenging Moral Decision Support of Sports Majors in Internet of Things and Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Xingxing Zong

    (Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 999038 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Lian Wang

    (Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 999038 Gdansk, Poland
    Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Qingyuan Xie

    (Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 999038 Gdansk, Poland
    Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)

  • Mariusz Lipowski

    (Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 999038 Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

This work intends to examine the influence of different dimensions of psychological distance on the moral decision-making of sports college students in sports dilemmas under different learning pressure conditions, and to further investigate the relationship between psychological distance and moral decision-making. The research on the influencing factors of moral decision-making of sports majors can effectively help to understand the moral cognition level of the group, and provide a reference for the interpretation of athletes’ moral anomie behavior, thereby enriching the content of the moral quality education of athletes. This work intends to study the impact of psychological distance on the moral decision support of sports college students in the context of the Internet of Things (IoT) and machine learning. Psychological distance in the machine learning environment may affect individuals’ understanding and cognition of events and, to a certain extent, can change students’ cognition and judgment of events. IoT and machine learning environments are chosen as the foundation. The learning pressure of college students majoring in physical education is a variable. A questionnaire survey and experimental design are used to test the influence of different degrees of learning pressure, social distance, and spatial distance on the moral decision-making of physical education college students in the sports dilemma. The dimensions of the psychological distance of physical education (PE) students are analyzed under different stress conditions and their impact on the moral decision-making of PE students. This experiment adopts a mixed experimental design of 3 learning stresses (no stress vs. moderate stress vs. high stress) × 2 social distances (self vs. others) × 2 spatial distances (Beijing vs. France). The results show that the main effect of social distance is significant. When the self is the decision-making subject, individuals tend to make more moral decisions. There is a significant interaction between social distance and learning pressure. In a stress-free and high-stress environment, individuals make a significant increase in the number of moral decisions when faced with self-centered decision-making. Now, moral decision-making and its consequences are important for college students majoring in sports. The results of their moral decision-making in the field of education directly reflect the image of the individual and even the institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingxing Zong & Lian Wang & Qingyuan Xie & Mariusz Lipowski, 2022. "The Influence of Psychological Distance on the Challenging Moral Decision Support of Sports Majors in Internet of Things and Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12115-:d:924585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, H. Shawna & Mitchell, Ronald K. & Brigham, Keith H. & Howell, Roy & Steinbauer, Robert, 2018. "Perceived psychological distance, construal processes, and abstractness of entrepreneurial action," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 296-314.
    2. Amani Aldahiri & Bashair Alrashed & Walayat Hussain, 2021. "Trends in Using IoT with Machine Learning in Health Prediction System," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Liwen & Cheng, Zhiming & Tani, Massimiliano & Cook, Sarah & Zhao, Jiaqi & Chen, Xi, 2022. "Air Pollution and Entrepreneurship," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1196, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Colin Donaldson & Francisco Liñán & Joaquin Alegre, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Intentions: Moving the Field Forwards," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(1), pages 30-55, March.
    3. Yingqi Liu & Ruijun Chen & Fei Zhou & Shuang Zhang & Juan Wang, 2021. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Organizational Resilience in the ISM Framework: An Exploratory Study Based on Multiple Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Lucas, David S. & Fuller, Caleb S. & Packard, Mark D., 2022. "Made to be broken? A theory of regulatory governance and rule-breaking entrepreneurial action," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(6).
    5. Walayat Hussain & Asma Musabah Alkalbani & Honghao Gao, 2021. "Forecasting with Machine Learning Techniques," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-2, November.
    6. Laurent Vilanova & Ivana Vitanova, 2020. "Unwrapping opportunity confidence: how do different types of feasibility beliefs affect venture emergence?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 215-236, June.
    7. Carolina Del-Valle-Soto & Leonardo J. Valdivia & Juan Carlos López-Pimentel & Paolo Visconti, 2023. "Comparison of Collaborative and Cooperative Schemes in Sensor Networks for Non-Invasive Monitoring of People at Home," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Amir Emami & Shayegheh Ashourizadeh & Shima Sheikhi & Gadaf Rexhepi, 2022. "Entrepreneurial propensity for market analysis in the time of COVID-19: benefits from individual entrepreneurial orientation and opportunity confidence," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2413-2439, November.
    9. Küsshauer, Alexander & Baum, Matthias, 2023. "The good, the bad and the uncertain: Employers' perceptions of former entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2).
    10. Liu, Jingting & Zhu, Ying & Serapio, Manuel & Cavusgil, S. Tamer, 2019. "The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: A review and call for research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    11. Michael Pietersen & Melodi Botha, 2021. "Achieving coherence: towards a model of the nascent-stage behavioral dynamics of new venture teams," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1261-1290, September.
    12. Lewis, Trey & Hechavarría, Diana M. & Williams, David W. & Cardon, Melissa S., 2024. "Doing the right things at the right times: The role of temporal enactment in venture outcome attainment," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    13. Branzei, Oana & Parker, Simon C. & Moroz, Peter W. & Gamble, Edward, 2018. "Going pro-social: Extending the individual-venture nexus to the collective level," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 551-565.
    14. Gish, J. Jeffrey & Wagner, David T. & Grégoire, Denis A. & Barnes, Christopher M., 2019. "Sleep and entrepreneurs' abilities to imagine and form initial beliefs about new venture ideas," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(6).
    15. Hanan Butt & Muhammad Raheel Raza & Muhammad Javed Ramzan & Muhammad Junaid Ali & Muhammad Haris, 2021. "Attention-Based CNN-RNN Arabic Text Recognition from Natural Scene Images," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12115-:d:924585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.