IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12064-d923716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Factor Market Distortion on the Efficiency of Technological Innovation: A Spatial Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Lu

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Chao Hua

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Jianjun Miao

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

Abstract

The growth of scientific and technological innovation in China is facing a bottleneck under the influence of domestic and foreign environments. The economic internal circulation policy of China may explore new driving forces for innovation from the perspective of optimizing the efficiency of production factor allocation. This research applies the provincial data from 2001 to 2017 to empirically investigate the spatial effects of factor market distortions on the efficiency of technological innovation. The DEA (Data envelopment analysis) model with variable returns to scale is exploited to measure the efficiency of technological innovation. The production function approach can be harnessed to measure labor market distortions and capital market distortions. The spatial correlation test results and the spatial econometric results regressed with three spatial weight matrices draw the following conclusions: (1) No matter how the spatial connection is established, the efficiency of the scientific and technological innovation in China shows a strong positive spatial correlation. (2) Labor market distortion and capital market distortion lead to low factor allocation efficiency, which inhibits the improvement of scientific and technological innovation efficiency. (3) When considering inter-regional economic connections, the inhibitory effect of factor market distortions on the efficiency of technological innovation shows spillover effects on surrounding areas. (4) Human capital and advanced industrial structure are conducive to the improvement of scientific and technological innovation efficiency. Optimizing the efficiency of factor market allocation can become a significant path for China to release new room for improvement in scientific and technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Lu & Chao Hua & Jianjun Miao, 2022. "The Impact of Factor Market Distortion on the Efficiency of Technological Innovation: A Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12064-:d:923716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acharya, Viral & Xu, Zhaoxia, 2017. "Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public versus private firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 223-243.
    2. Tom Broekel, 2015. "Do Cooperative Research and Development (R&D) Subsidies Stimulate Regional Innovation Efficiency? Evidence from Germany," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(7), pages 1087-1110, July.
    3. Junhong Bai, 2013. "On Regional Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from Panel Data of China's Different Provinces," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 773-788, May.
    4. Blind, Knut & Petersen, Sören S. & Riillo, Cesare A.F., 2017. "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 249-264.
    5. Mourad Dakhli & Dirk De Clercq, 2004. "Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 107-128, March.
    6. Ray, Subhash C & Desli, Evangelia, 1997. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1033-1039, December.
    7. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    8. Xiafei Chen & Zhiying Liu & Chaoliang Ma, 2017. "Chinese innovation-driving factors: regional structure, innovation effect, and economic development—empirical research based on panel data," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 59(1), pages 43-68, July.
    9. Bhagwati, Jagdish N & Ramaswami, V K & Srinivasan, T N, 1969. "Domestic Distortions, Tariffs, and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy: Some Further Results," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(6), pages 1005-1010, Nov./Dec..
    10. Ljungwall, Christer & Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson, 2015. "Is China different? A meta-analysis of the growth-enhancing effect from R&D spending in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 272-278.
    11. Chen, Jian & Wang, Lingjun & Li, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Natural resources, urbanization and regional innovation capabilities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Guan, JianCheng & Yam, Richard C.M., 2015. "Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 273-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meixia Wang & Yunxia Wang, 2024. "Does Factor Market Distortion Inhibit Enterprise Innovation? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Industrial Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12830-12853, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Liangliang & Huang, Shoujun, 2022. "Social capital and regional innovation efficiency: The moderating effect of governance quality," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 343-359.
    2. Mehmet Güney Celbiş & Pui-Hang Wong & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Innovativeness, Work Flexibility, and Place Characteristics: A Spatial Econometric and Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Abdul Jalil & Abdul Rauf & Li Han, 2024. "Financial Development, R&D and Knowledge Production: Empirical Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14617-14642, September.
    4. Hong, Jin & Feng, Bing & Wu, Yanrui & Wang, Liangbing, 2016. "Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 4-13.
    5. Deng, Xin & Li, Qian Cher & Mateut, Simona, 2022. "Participation in setting technology standards and the implied cost of equity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    6. Fang, Zhen & Razzaq, Asif & Mohsin, Muhammad & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Medase, Kehinde, 2019. "The Impact of the Heterogeneity of Employees’ Qualifications on Firm-level Innovation Evidence from Nigerian Firms," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203563, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Fang Wang & Xiaoyong Dai, 2020. "Regulation and product innovation: the intermediate role of resource reallocation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1035-1061, September.
    9. Sandro Mendonca & Hugo Confraria & Manuel Mira Godinho, 2021. "Appropriating the returns of patent statistics: Take-up and development in the wake of Zvi Griliches," SPRU Working Paper Series 2021-07, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    10. Sun, Helin & Cappa, Francesco & Zhu, Jia & Peruffo, Enzo, 2023. "The effect of CEO social capital, CEO duality and state-ownership on corporate innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Kou, Mingting & Yang, Yuanqi & Chen, Kaihua, 2020. "The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 375-387.
    12. Chen, Kaihua & Kou, Mingting & Fu, Xiaolan, 2018. "Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to China's regional R&D systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 103-114.
    13. Walid Gani, 2024. "Does Competition Spur Innovation in North Africa? Evidence from a Panel ARDL Approach," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 16(2), pages 212-230, May.
    14. Tian, Guangning & Zhou, Shuyuan & Hsu, Sara, 2020. "Executive financial literacy and firm innovation in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Michael Amponsah Odei & Samuel Amponsah Odei & Petr Novak, 2020. "Demystifying the Factors Contributing to Successful Process Innovations in the Czech Automotive Industries," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 136-150.
    16. Liu, Yunqiang & Liu, Sha & Shao, Xiaoyu & He, Yanqiu, 2022. "Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Hasan, Iftekhar & (Stan) Hoi, Chun-Keung & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2020. "Is social capital associated with corporate innovation? Evidence from publicly listed firms in the U.S," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. repec:rri:wpaper:201303 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Konon, Alexander & Fritsch, Michael & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2018. "Business cycles and start-ups across industries: An empirical analysis of German regions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 742-761.
    20. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    21. Jose M. Cordero & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2017. "Evaluating hotel productivity growth in Balearic and Canary islands," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(5), pages 1146-1154, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12064-:d:923716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.