IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11275-d910259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the SUNRA Tool to Improve Regional and Local Sustainability of the Transportation Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne Anderson-Sköld

    (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 58195 Linköping, Sweden
    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Muhammad Amjad Afridi

    (Skellefteå Municipality, Strömsörgatan 15, 93134 Skellefteå, Sweden
    Department of Building Materials, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Lina Nordin

    (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 58195 Linköping, Sweden)

  • João Patricio

    (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 58195 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Åsa Lindgren

    (Swedish Transport Administration, P.O. Box 3057, 90302 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Carl-Martin Johansson

    (Swedish Transport Administration, P.O. Box 3057, 90302 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Alexandra Olofsson

    (Swedish Transport Administration, P.O. Box 3057, 90302 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Angelica Andersson

    (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 58195 Linköping, Sweden
    Department of Science and Technology, Campus Norrköping, Linköping University, 60174 Norrköping, Sweden)

  • Sigurdur Erlingsson

    (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 58195 Linköping, Sweden
    Department of Building Materials, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden
    Faculty of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, 108 Reykjavik, Iceland)

Abstract

To fulfil the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), achieving sustainable development is becoming urgent, not least in the transportation sector. In response to this, the sustainability framework Sustainability National Road Administrations (SUNRA) was developed to contribute to improving the sustainability performance of national road administrations across Europe. In the present study, the framework has been tested, applied and further developed to be applicable for target setting and follow-up at the project level at both the Swedish Transport Administration (STA) and at municipal levels. The aim was a framework relevant for investment, re-investments, maintenance and operation projects and also to make it more user applicable. The study also investigated how the framework can contribute to sustainability, identified drivers and barriers for applying the framework and examined whether the framework can be applied and adapted to projects of different complexities. The adaptations and developments were done in collaboration between researchers and practitioners. The results show that the framework could easily be used and adapted for investment, re-investment, maintenance and operation projects in the planning stage, as well as for small municipal establishments, construction or reconstruction of residential areas and frequent maintenance. The framework contributes to increased awareness on sustainability, and it provides a common structure and transparency on how infrastructure project goals/targets are set and fulfilled. The framework can also be applied to follow the fulfilment of the goals/targets and thereby adapt the project to better fulfil the goals. Identified barriers include the lack of obligations and lack of experience in using sustainability frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne Anderson-Sköld & Muhammad Amjad Afridi & Lina Nordin & João Patricio & Åsa Lindgren & Carl-Martin Johansson & Alexandra Olofsson & Angelica Andersson & Sigurdur Erlingsson, 2022. "Development of the SUNRA Tool to Improve Regional and Local Sustainability of the Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11275-:d:910259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P.C. Bueno & J.M. Vassallo & K. Cheung, 2015. "Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 622-649, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Mariia Dushenko & Clemet Thærie Bjorbæk & Kenn Steger-Jensen, 2018. "Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing the Relocation of a Container Terminal: A Case Study of Kristiansand Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Sneha Kaira & Oz Sahin & Anisur Rahman & Sherif Mohamed, 2022. "An Integrated DPSIR-SD Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Roads in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Cezar TECLEAN & Gabriela DRÄ‚GAN, 2020. "How to measure territorial accessibility. An accessibility evaluation model applied in the European Union space," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 26-47, December.
    5. Maurici Ruiz-Pérez & Joana Maria Seguí-Pons, 2020. "Transport Mode Choice for Residents in a Tourist Destination: The Long Road to Sustainability (the Case of Mallorca, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-31, November.
    6. Leonardo Sierra & Felipe Araya & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Consideration of Uncertainty and Multiple Disciplines in the Determination of Sustainable Criteria for Rural Roads Using Neutrosophic Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Mateusz Rydlewski & Agnieszka A. Tubis, 2022. "Criteria for Assessing the Safety and Functionality of Tram Stops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Francis Marleau Donais & Irène Abi-Zeid & E. Owen D. Waygood & Roxane Lavoie, 2019. "A review of cost–benefit analysis and multicriteria decision analysis from the perspective of sustainable transport in project evaluation," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 327-358, November.
    9. Pan, Wei & Yu, Cong & Bai, Yefei & Du, Jia, 2023. "A four-level hierarchical framework for reviewing infrastructure sustainability assessment systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Chi, Sae & Bunker, Jonathan, 2021. "An Australian perspective on real-life cost-benefit analysis and assessment frameworks for transport infrastructure investments," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Isabelle Nicolaï & Rémy Le Boennec, 2018. "Smart mobility providing smart cities," Post-Print halshs-01794612, HAL.
    12. Dhirendra Kumar Tiwari & Urvashi Tandon & Amit Mittal, 2024. "Analysing adoption of eVehicles among Indian consumers: a novel approach towards sustainable transport," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22997-23023, September.
    13. Chisomo Kapatsa & Neema Kavishe & Godwin Maro & Sam Zulu, 2023. "The Identification of Sustainability Assessment Indicators for Road Infrastructure Projects in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Ravindra Kumar & Rajeev Kumar Mishra & Satish Chandra & Asif Hussain, 2021. "Evaluation of urban transport-environment sustainable indicators during Odd–Even scheme in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17240-17262, December.
    15. Marleau Donais, Francis & Abi-Zeid, Irène & Waygood, E. Owen D. & Lavoie, Roxane, 2022. "Municipal decision-making for sustainable transportation: Towards improving current practices for street rejuvenation in Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 152-170.
    16. Andreea-Mariana Manta & Cristina Dima & Marin Andreica, 2019. "A New Cost in Measuring Investment Performance - Cost of Non – Intervention," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 138-144.
    17. Sun, Lishan & Wang, Shunchao & Liu, Shuli & Yao, Liya & Luo, Wei & Shukla, Ashish, 2018. "A completive research on the feasibility and adaptation of shared transportation in mega-cities – A case study in Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1014-1033.
    18. Damián Rodríguez Estévez & Rosa María Arce Ruíz, 2024. "Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Rémy Le Boennec & Isabelle Nicolaï & Pascal da Costa, 2018. "Implementing a two-step decision-aid tool for the assessment of new mobility offers in a spatial framework," Post-Print halshs-01942700, HAL.
    20. Le Boennec, Rémy & Nicolaï, Isabelle & Da Costa, Pascal, 2019. "Assessing 50 innovative mobility offers in low-density areas: A French application using a two-step decision-aid method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11275-:d:910259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.