IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11093-d907228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seven Hundred Projects in iNaturalist Spain: Performance and Lessons Learned

Author

Listed:
  • Gloria Martínez-Sagarra

    (Unidad de Coordinación de GBIF España (GBIF.ES), CSIC, C/Joaquín Costa, 22, 28002 Madrid, Spain
    Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Felipe Castilla

    (Unidad de Coordinación de GBIF España (GBIF.ES), CSIC, C/Joaquín Costa, 22, 28002 Madrid, Spain)

  • Francisco Pando

    (Unidad de Coordinación de GBIF España (GBIF.ES), CSIC, C/Joaquín Costa, 22, 28002 Madrid, Spain
    Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo, 2, 28014 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Citizen science projects seem to have a high potential to provide systematized, high-quality biodiversity observations for science and other purposes. iNaturalist offers users purposeful participation by creating projects that allow observations to be grouped with a taxonomic and geographic focus, as well as on a given time scale. Between 2014 and December 2021, 720 iNaturalist projects have been created for Spain, most of them after the establishment of Natusfera—the Spanish branch of the iNaturalist global Community—in 2020. In this paper, we analyze how iNaturalist projects are created; how they perform in terms of engagement, data contribution, and impact; and assess the degree and possible causes of their success. A database with project descriptors and indicators was created for this purpose. We discovered that a high percentage of the projects (more than 25%) perform far short of expectations, and that bioblitzes are in general very successful in terms of creation, dissemination, and participation. Finally, we present some recommendations aiming to make these projects more effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Gloria Martínez-Sagarra & Felipe Castilla & Francisco Pando, 2022. "Seven Hundred Projects in iNaturalist Spain: Performance and Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11093-:d:907228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andres Echeverria & Idoia Ariz & Judit Moreno & Javier Peralta & Esther M. Gonzalez, 2021. "Learning Plant Biodiversity in Nature: The Use of the Citizen–Science Platform iNaturalist as a Collaborative Tool in Secondary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Nina Wróblewska, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Citizen Environmental Participation: Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Juan-Francisco Álvarez-Herrero, 2023. "Urban Itineraries with Smartphones to Promote an Improvement in Environmental Awareness among Secondary School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Gheorghe-Gavrilă Hognogi & Monika Meltzer & Filip Alexandrescu & Lucrina Ștefănescu, 2023. "The role of citizen science mobile apps in facilitating a contemporary digital agora," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Maria Panitsa & Nikolia Iliopoulou & Emmanouil Petrakis, 2021. "Citizen Science, Plant Species, and Communities’ Diversity and Conservation on a Mediterranean Biosphere Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Małgorzata Gawlik-Kobylińska, 2021. "Can Security and Safety Education Support Sustainability? Lessons Learned from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Larissa Braz Sousa & Stephen Fricker & Cameron E. Webb & Katherine L. Baldock & Craig R. Williams, 2022. "Citizen Science Mosquito Surveillance by Ad Hoc Observation Using the iNaturalist Platform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Terence Fell & Tove Rydenstam & Benti Geleta Buli & Abby C. King & Katarina Bälter, 2021. "Citizen Science in Sweden’s Stigmatized Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11093-:d:907228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.