IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10479-d895281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Status of Safety and Health for Golf Course Caddies and Improvement of Protective Measures in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Ja-Young Lee

    (Korea Disaster Prevention and Management Agency, Ansan 15457, Korea
    School of Social Safety System Engineering, Research Center for Safety and Health, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Korea)

  • Chankyu Kang

    (School of Social Safety System Engineering, Research Center for Safety and Health, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Korea)

Abstract

Due to the rapid expansion of the leisure industry, there were about 32,000 golf caddies in South Korea in 2020, an increase of 18.5% compared to 2016. Consequently, they face an increasing industrial accident rate, which is presumed to be the result of exposure to various harmful factors. Through a survey and oral interview of 221 caddies across more than 20 golf courses, health protective measures, protective measures for caddies, preparation for golf cart operation, physical burden, compliance with golf cart safety during games, and golf course responses to emotional labor were investigated in this study to identify safety and health problems of caddies and suggest prevention measures. Preliminary interviews were conducted to confirm golf courses’ safety and health status and participants’ characteristics. Golf caddies’ health and safety were confirmed using frequency analysis, independent sample t -test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The results showed that caddies’ workplaces were relatively vulnerable to safety and health issues and caddies were exposed to various harmful risk factors. In addition, it was confirmed that golf caddy protective measures, golf cart safety compliance, physical burden, and health protection affect golf courses’ response level to caddies’ emotional labor.

Suggested Citation

  • Ja-Young Lee & Chankyu Kang, 2022. "A Study on the Status of Safety and Health for Golf Course Caddies and Improvement of Protective Measures in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10479-:d:895281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennica Garnett & Felix Made & Nonhlanhla Tlotleng & Kerry Wilson & Nisha Naicker, 2020. "Work Related Musculoskeletal Pain in Golf Caddies—Johannesburg, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Chengwu Li & Xiangbing Wang & Chengmin Wei & Min Hao & Zhen Qiao & Yonghang He, 2021. "Analysis of the Correlation between Occupational Accidents and Economic Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Jesús Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo & Ventura Pérez-Mira & María del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira & Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero, 2019. "Analysis of Required Investigations of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Lidia Engel & Nick Bansback & Stirling Bryan & Mary M. Doyle-Waters & David G. T. Whitehurst, 2016. "Exclusion Criteria in National Health State Valuation Studies," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(7), pages 798-810, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Luiz Soares & Antonio Augusto de Paula Xavier & Ariel Orlei Michaloski, 2020. "Occupational Risk Evaluation through Infrared Thermography: Development and Proposal of a Rapid Screening Tool for Risk Assessment Arising from Repetitive Actions of the Upper Limbs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Zuzhen Ji & Dirk Pons & Zhouyang Su & Zichong Lyu & John Pearse, 2022. "Integrating Occupational Health and Safety Risk and Production Economics for Sustainable SME Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Nancy J. Devlin & Koonal K. Shah & Yan Feng & Brendan Mulhern & Ben van Hout, 2018. "Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 7-22, January.
    4. Chris Sampson & David Parkin & Nancy Devlin, 2024. "Is anchoring at ‘dead’ a theoretical requirement for health state valuation?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(9), pages 1929-1935, September.
    5. Stefan A. Lipman, 2021. "Time for Tele-TTO? Lessons Learned From Digital Interviewer-Assisted Time Trade-Off Data Collection," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 459-469, September.
    6. Michał Jakubczyk, 2023. "Re-revisiting the Utilities of Health States Worse than Dead: The Problem Remains," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(7-8), pages 875-885, October.
    7. Marian Sorin Paveliu & Elena Olariu & Raluca Caplescu & Yemi Oluboyede & Ileana-Gabriela Niculescu-Aron & Simona Ernu & Luke Vale, 2021. "Estimating an EQ-5D-3L Value Set for Romania Using Time Trade-Off," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. S. A. Lipman & V. T. Reckers-Droog & M. Karimi & M. Jakubczyk & A. E. Attema, 2021. "Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(9), pages 1507-1518, December.
    9. Yan Feng & Nancy J. Devlin & Koonal K. Shah & Brendan Mulhern & Ben van Hout, 2018. "New methods for modelling EQ‐5D‐5L value sets: An application to English data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 23-38, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10479-:d:895281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.