IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9797-d883416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physico-Mechanical Characterization of Gypsum-Agricultural Waste Composites for Developing Eco-Friendly False Ceiling Tiles

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Fahad Ejaz

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Lahore 54890, Punjab, Pakistan
    Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama 338-8570, Japan)

  • Muhammad Rizwan Riaz

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Lahore 54890, Punjab, Pakistan)

  • Rizwan Azam

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Lahore 54890, Punjab, Pakistan)

  • Rashid Hameed

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Lahore 54890, Punjab, Pakistan)

  • Anam Fatima

    (Department of Architectural Engineering and Design, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Lahore 54890, Punjab, Pakistan)

  • Ahmed Farouk Deifalla

    (Structural Engineering and Construction Management Department, Future University in Egypt, Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 12673, Saudi Arabia
    Building & Construction Technology Department, Bayan College of Science and Technology, Khartoum 210, Sudan)

Abstract

This paper aims to facilitate in the reduction of issues related to agricultural wastes such as disposal and burning by incorporating two widely produced agricultural wastes in Pakistan, i.e., Rice Husk and Wheat Straw, in gypsum false ceiling plates to develop an eco-friendly construction product. There is an increased focus of research on the development of such eco-friendly gypsum products to make the use of gypsum sustainable. Composites containing agricultural residues with four different replacement levels of 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% by weight are developed along with a control mix containing 100% gypsum. The physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the developed composites are investigated. Also, the false ceiling plates are made using the developed composites and their flexural behavior is compared with that of the control specimen containing 100% gypsum. The results showed that density and shore C hardness reduced with increasing the amount of agricultural waste while the water absorption remained similar up to a dosage of 7.5%. Except for the 10% wheat straw dosage, flexural and compressive strength of developed composites showed a decrease with the increase of wheat straw and rice husk dosages but remained above the acceptable values of 1 MPa and 2 MPa, respectively, as per BS EN 14246. For the same replacement level, the composites containing wheat straw showed relatively inferior mechanical properties results as compared to those containing rice husk. The thermal conductivity test showed better thermal performance of the composite mixes as compared to the reference mix. The bending test on false ceiling plates showed that all the plates satisfied the minimum flexural strength criteria as per BS EN 14246 and the flexural strength of plates increased up to a replacement level of 5% for both the agricultural wastes.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Fahad Ejaz & Muhammad Rizwan Riaz & Rizwan Azam & Rashid Hameed & Anam Fatima & Ahmed Farouk Deifalla & Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed, 2022. "Physico-Mechanical Characterization of Gypsum-Agricultural Waste Composites for Developing Eco-Friendly False Ceiling Tiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9797-:d:883416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hafiz Usman Ghani & Awais Mahmood & Asmat Ullah & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Performance Analysis of Bagasse-Based Electricity in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Mónica Morales-Segura & César Porras-Amores & Paola Villoria-Sáez & David Caballol-Bartolomé, 2020. "Characterization of Gypsum Composites Containing Cigarette Butt Waste for Building Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Daniel Ferrández & Manuel Álvarez & Pablo Saiz & Alicia Zaragoza, 2022. "Experimental Study with Plaster Mortars Made with Recycled Aggregate and Thermal Insulation Residues for Application in Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meryem Bortali & Mohamed Rabouli & Madiha Yessari & Abdelowahed Hajjaji, 2023. "Characterizing Harbor Dredged Sediment for Sustainable Reuse as Construction Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duong Minh Ngoc & Montri Luengchavanon & Pham Thi Anh & Kim Humphreys & Kuaanan Techato, 2022. "Shades of Green: Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Small-Scale Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Tree," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Rocio Peralta Ring & Gisela Cordoba & Natalia Delbianco & Carla Priano & Viviana Rahhal, 2024. "Circular Economy Approach: Recycling Toner Waste in Cement-Based Construction Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Shiqing Yang & Mingjie Gu & Hongyi Lin & Yue Gong, 2023. "Property Improvement of Recycled Coarse Aggregate by Accelerated Carbonation Treatment under Different Curing Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9797-:d:883416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.