IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9549-d879502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Evolution of the Spatial-Temporal Pattern and the Influencing Mechanism of the Green Development Level of the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration

Author

Listed:
  • Shuguang Jiang

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)

  • Huilu Yu

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)

  • Zehong Li

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Biao Geng

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Ting Li

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)

Abstract

Improving the level of green development is an inevitable requirement for promoting the construction of an ecological civilization. In this paper, through a green development level evaluation index system, the CRITIC weight method is used to comprehensively evaluate and analyze the green development level of the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration from 2007 to 2019. On this basis, a panel data model was constructed to analyze the key influencing factors of the green development level of the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration. Studies have shown that (1) the level of green development in the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration from 2007 to 2019 has been steadily improved, but the overall level is still at a low level, with significant differences among the cities. (2) Qingdao and Jinan are the two growth poles of the green development level of Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration. The dual-core leading effect is obvious, forming a spatial pattern in which the green development level of the eastern and central regions is higher than that of other regions’ green development level. (3) Weihai, Dongying, and Qingdao are high-level cities of green development, while Jinan, Yantai, Zibo, Tai’an, and Linyi are medium-level cities of green development. The green development level of other cities is relatively low, and the high-level cities of green development are mostly the Jiaodong economic circle and provincial capital economic circle. (4) Industrial structure, scientific and technological innovation, and government policies are the critical factors in promoting the green development of the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuguang Jiang & Huilu Yu & Zehong Li & Biao Geng & Ting Li, 2022. "Study on the Evolution of the Spatial-Temporal Pattern and the Influencing Mechanism of the Green Development Level of the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9549-:d:879502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shumin Zhang & Yongze Lv & Baolei Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Green Development in the Yellow River Basin of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Kangwen Zhu & Dan Song & Lanxin Zhang & Yong He & Sheng Zhang & Yaqun Liu & Xiaosong Tian, 2023. "Evolving Trends and Influencing Factors of the Rural Green Development Level in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Wanxin He & Jianhua Fu & Youxi Luo, 2023. "A Study of Well-Being-Based Eco-efficiency Based on Super-SBM and Tobit Regression Model: The Case of China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 289-317, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9549-:d:879502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.