IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9087-d870878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass-Based Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts from the Perspective of Ecological Aesthetics—Duckweed Has More Advantages than Soybean

Author

Listed:
  • Meiping Zhang

    (College of Liberal Arts, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China)

  • Yanqi Zhang

    (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Jiajia Cui

    (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Zongyao Zhang

    (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Zaoxue Yan

    (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

Ecological aesthetics encourages the harmonization of humans and nature. In this paper, we integrate ecological aesthetics into the development of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts of H 2 /O 2 fuel cells. Moldy soybean and duckweed as raw materials are adopted to prepare biomass-based ORR catalysts, both of which have advantages in activity, stability, environmental protection and resource richness over the conventional expensive and scarce noble metal-based catalysts. Therefore, duckweed is more environmentally friendly, entails a simpler preparation process and has a better catalytic performance, ultimately being more in line with ecological aesthetics.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiping Zhang & Yanqi Zhang & Jiajia Cui & Zongyao Zhang & Zaoxue Yan, 2022. "Biomass-Based Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts from the Perspective of Ecological Aesthetics—Duckweed Has More Advantages than Soybean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9087-:d:870878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9087/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9087/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongning Chen & Qingli Zou & Zhuojian Liang & Hao Liu & Quan Li & Yi-Chun Lu, 2015. "Sulphur-impregnated flow cathode to enable high-energy-density lithium flow batteries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Christos Vlachokostas, 2020. "Closing the Loop Between Energy Production and Waste Management: A Conceptual Approach Towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Zhe Wang & Lin Zhao & Guozhu Mao & Ben Wu, 2015. "Eco-Efficiency Trends and Decoupling Analysis of Environmental Pressures in Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Tyler M. Huggins & Albert Latorre & Justin C. Biffinger & Zhiyong Jason Ren, 2016. "Biochar Based Microbial Fuel Cell for Enhanced Wastewater Treatment and Nutrient Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Ance Plavniece & Aleksandrs Volperts & Galina Dobele & Aivars Zhurinsh & Kätlin Kaare & Ivar Kruusenberg & Kaspars Kaprans & Ainars Knoks & Janis Kleperis, 2021. "Wood and Black Liquor-Based N-Doped Activated Carbon for Energy Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pingshu Leng & Hanbin Wang & Binfeng Wu & Lei Zhao & Yijing Deng & Jinting Cui & Houzhao Wan & Lin Lv, 2022. "Ag Decorated Co 3 O 4 -Nitrogen Doped Porous Carbon as the Bifunctional Cathodic Catalysts for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Vangelis Marinakis & Alexandros Flamos & Giorgos Stamtsis & Ioannis Georgizas & Yannis Maniatis & Haris Doukas, 2020. "The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Sipan Li & Qunxi Gong & Shaolei Yang, 2019. "Analysis of the Agricultural Economy and Agricultural Pollution Using the Decoupling Index in Chengdu, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Tiejun Dai & Shuo Shan, 2020. "Path Analysis of Beijing’s Dematerialization Development Based on System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Kumar, Vineet & Malyan, Sandeep Kumar & Apollon, Wilgince & Verma, Pradeep, 2024. "Valorization of pulp and paper industry waste streams into bioenergy and value-added products: An integrated biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Tibor Princz-Jakovics & Márton Szemenyei, 2024. "Development of an e-governance system to support cooperative environmental policy actions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 763-778, December.
    7. Diamantis, Vasileios & Eftaxias, Alexandros & Stamatelatou, Katerina & Noutsopoulos, Constantinos & Vlachokostas, Christos & Aivasidis, Alexandros, 2021. "Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 438-447.
    8. Ilona Skačkauskienė & Povilas Švogžlys, 2021. "Improving the Process of Developing New Services Using Uncertain Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Malyan, Sandeep K. & Kumar, Smita S. & Fagodiya, Ram Kishor & Ghosh, Pooja & Kumar, Amit & Singh, Rajesh & Singh, Lakhveer, 2021. "Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroecosystem nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Yi Li & Yan Luo & Yingzi Wang & Laili Wang & Manhong Shen, 2017. "Decomposing the Decoupling of Water Consumption and Economic Growth in China’s Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Hmouda, Ahmed M.O. & Orzes, Guido & Sauer, Philipp C., 2024. "Sustainable supply chain management in energy production: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Ali Abdelaal & Vittoria Benedetti & Audrey Villot & Francesco Patuzzi & Claire Gerente & Marco Baratieri, 2023. "Innovative Pathways for the Valorization of Biomass Gasification Char: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Jing Li & Lipeng Hou & Lin Wang & Lina Tang, 2021. "Decoupling Analysis between Economic Growth and Air Pollution in Key Regions of Air Pollution Control in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Weronika Urbańska & Anna Janda & Magdalena Osial & Mateusz Słowikowski, 2023. "Sustainable Municipal Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Case Study of Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Vanessa Bach & Nikolay Minkov & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Assessing the Ability of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program to Reliably Determine the Environmental Performance of Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Yadong Ning & Boya Zhang & Tao Ding & Ming Zhang, 2017. "Analysis of regional decoupling relationship between energy-related CO2 emission and economic growth in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 867-883, June.
    17. Kamali, Mohammadreza & Guo, Yutong & Aminabhavi, Tejraj M. & Abbassi, Rouzbeh & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2023. "Pathway towards the commercialization of sustainable microbial fuel cell-based wastewater treatment technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Kleanthis Koupidis & Charalampos Bratsas & Christos Vlachokostas, 2022. "OpΕnergy: An Intelligent System for Monitoring EU Energy Strategy Using EU Open Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9087-:d:870878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.