IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8720-d864365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Co-Composting as an Alternative for the Use of Agricultural Waste of Spring Onions, Chicken Manure and Bio-Waste Produced in Moorland Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar Ricardo Oviedo-Ocaña

    (Grupo de Investigación en Recurso Hídrico y Saneamiento Ambiental-GPH, Facultad de Ingenierías Fisicomecánicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Ciudad Universitaria Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia)

  • Angelica Hernández-Gómez

    (Grupo de Investigación en Recurso Hídrico y Saneamiento Ambiental-GPH, Facultad de Ingenierías Fisicomecánicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Ciudad Universitaria Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia)

  • Isabel Dominguez

    (Grupo de Investigación en Recurso Hídrico y Saneamiento Ambiental-GPH, Facultad de Ingenierías Fisicomecánicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Ciudad Universitaria Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia)

  • Brayan Alexis Parra-Orobio

    (Grupo de Investigación en Recurso Hídrico y Saneamiento Ambiental-GPH, Facultad de Ingenierías Fisicomecánicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Ciudad Universitaria Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia)

  • Jonathan Soto-Paz

    (Grupo de Investigación en Recurso Hídrico y Saneamiento Ambiental-GPH, Facultad de Ingenierías Fisicomecánicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Ciudad Universitaria Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia)

  • Antoni Sánchez

    (Composting Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Composting is an adequate method for treating and valorizing agricultural waste such as those from spring onion (SO) cultivation and chicken breeding (chicken manure–CM). However, the low content of Total Organic Carbon in the waste from SO and the high concentration of total nitrogen in CM are limitations for the composting process. This research studied the co-composting of SO and CM in a moorland ecosystem, together with locally available co-substrates such as biowaste (BW) and woodchips (WC), focusing on the effect of co-composting in process development and end-product quality. A pilot-scale experiment was carried out using three treatments in triplicated composting piles: (i) Treatment A: 43% CM + 41% BW + 16% WC; (ii) Treatment B: 52% CM + 32% SO + 16% WC, and (iii) Treatment C: 70% SO + 30% WC. Treatments A and B reached thermophilic temperatures after two days of the process start and remained at that level for 17 days. However, treatment B reached environmental temperature during curing in a shorter time (43 days) than treatment A (53 days). Treatment C did not achieve thermophilic temperatures. Tests carried out at the end of the process showed end-product stability and non-phytotoxic characteristics (germination indexes 80%). The fertility index of the products showed that treatments A and B presented values of 4.3 (over 5.0) while treatment C obtained a value of 2.5. From the perspective of agricultural use, products from the three treatments had limitations due to deficiencies in essential nutrients like phosphorus. Still, they had potential as a soil amendment for restoration processes. In summary, we have demonstrated that this waste, in combination with other organic materials, could be a good amendment for the composting process and the end product.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar Ricardo Oviedo-Ocaña & Angelica Hernández-Gómez & Isabel Dominguez & Brayan Alexis Parra-Orobio & Jonathan Soto-Paz & Antoni Sánchez, 2022. "Evaluation of Co-Composting as an Alternative for the Use of Agricultural Waste of Spring Onions, Chicken Manure and Bio-Waste Produced in Moorland Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8720-:d:864365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8720/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8720/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Corato, Ugo & De Bari, Isabella & Viola, Egidio & Pugliese, Massimo, 2018. "Assessing the main opportunities of integrated biorefining from agro-bioenergy co/by-products and agroindustrial residues into high-value added products associated to some emerging markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 326-346.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brayan Alexis Parra-Orobio & Jonathan Soto-Paz & Jhon Alexander Hernández-Cruz & Martha Cecilia Gómez-Herreño & Isabel Cristina Domínguez-Rivera & Edgar Ricardo Oviedo-Ocaña, 2023. "Evaluation of Biochar as an Additive in the Co-Composting of Green Waste and Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, R.E. & Speight, R.E. & Blinco, J.L. & O'Hara, I.M., 2022. "Biorefining within food loss and waste frameworks: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Ugo De Corato, 2021. "Bioplastics from Winemaking By-products in the Buildings Sector: A Feasibility Study on the Main Opportunities, Barriers and Challenges," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1313-1333, December.
    3. Djukić-Vuković, A. & Mladenović, D. & Ivanović, J. & Pejin, J. & Mojović, L., 2019. "Towards sustainability of lactic acid and poly-lactic acid polymers production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 238-252.
    4. Greggio, Nicolas & Balugani, Enrico & Carlini, Carlotta & Contin, Andrea & Labartino, Nicola & Porcelli, Roberto & Quaranta, Marta & Righi, Serena & Vogli, Luciano & Marazza, Diego, 2019. "Theoretical and unused potential for residual biomasses in the Emilia Romagna Region (Italy) through a revised and portable framework for their categorization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 590-606.
    5. Ugo De Corato, 2020. "RETRACTED: Soil Microbiome Manipulation Gives New Insights in Plant Disease-Suppressive Soils from the Perspective of a Circular Economy: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-41, December.
    6. Hidalgo, D. & Martín-Marroquín, J.M. & Corona, F., 2019. "A multi-waste management concept as a basis towards a circular economy model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 481-489.
    7. Spyridon A. Petropoulos & Ângela Fernandes & Sofia Plexida & Carla Pereira & Maria Inês Dias & Ricardo Calhelha & Antonios Chrysargyris & Nikolaos Tzortzakis & Jovana Petrović & Marina D. Soković & Is, 2020. "The Sustainable Use of Cotton, Hazelnut and Ground Peanut Waste in Vegetable Crop Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Melts, Indrek & Ivask, Mari & Geetha, Mohan & Takeuchi, Kazuhiko & Heinsoo, Katrin, 2019. "Combining bioenergy and nature conservation: An example in wetlands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 293-302.
    9. Bolzonella, D. & Battista, F. & Mattioli, A. & Nicolato, C. & Frison, N. & Lampis, S., 2020. "Biological thermophilic post hydrolysis of digestate enhances the biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of agro-waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Barbara Bigliardi & Serena Filippelli, 2021. "Investigating Circular Business Model Innovation through Keywords Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8720-:d:864365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.