IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7885-d850565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensory Perception Mechanism for Preparing the Combinations of Stimuli Operation in the Architectural Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Chen

    (College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
    Research Institute of China Grand Canal, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Yi Liu

    (College of Electrical, Energy and Power Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Shengcai Li

    (College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Wanghu Sun

    (College of Architectural Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

Abstract

Sensory stimuli in an architectural space play an important role in the human perception of the indoor environment, no matter whether they are static or dynamic, isolated, or combined. By enhancing some perceptions in the sensory stimuli, the overall perceptions of an architectural space can be improved, especially for an intelligent architectural space. As yet, there are few studies reported about the sensory perception mechanism for the sensory stimuli operation in the architectural experience. In this research, a wooden micro building was prepared for the study of the sensitivity level of participants to various sensory stimuli in the same and in different sensory domains. Participants’ visual, auditory, olfactory, tactile and kinaesthesia perceptions were discussed statistically in terms of the sensitivity level. Based on the study, the effect of a single dynamic sensory stimulus (a dynamically coloured light) on the participants’ perception was studied in a paper architectural model from two aspects including preference and emotion. The dynamically coloured light was discussed statistically in terms of the level of preference. The study showed that there are significant differences among participants’ levels of sensitivity to the different sensory domains and to the different sensory stimuli. In particular, the sensitivity level to the stimulus that is the colour of a space is the highest of all stimuli. As a single changing sensory stimulus, a dynamically coloured light can lead to significant mood fluctuations and changes in the preference level. In particular, yellow is the favourite colour of light. The object of this study is expected to provide a theoretical foundation that is related to sensory choice, sensory perception enhancement and the combination forms of sensory perceptions. Based on the theoretical foundation, the perception design of overlapped multi-sensory stimuli and a single dynamic stimulus can be conducted to improve the quality of the indoor environment of normal and intelligent multi-sensory architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Chen & Yi Liu & Shengcai Li & Wanghu Sun, 2022. "Sensory Perception Mechanism for Preparing the Combinations of Stimuli Operation in the Architectural Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7885-:d:850565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salvador Boix-Vilella & Elena Saiz-Clar & Eva León-Zarceño & Miguel Angel Serrano, 2021. "Influence of Air Temperature on School Teachers’ Mood and the Perception of Students’ Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. So-Hyun Park & Jun-Hyung Kim & Yee-Myung Choi & Han-Lim Seo, 2013. "Design elements to improve pleasantness, vitality, safety, and complexity of the pedestrian environment: evidence from a Korean neighbourhood walkability case study," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 142-160, March.
    3. Zhen Li & Jiao Zhang & Mengwan Li & Jizhuo Huang & Xiangyu Wang, 2020. "A Review of Smart Design Based on Interactive Experience in Building Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Sangwon Lee & Hussain H. Alzoubi & Sooyoung Kim, 2017. "The Effect of Interior Design Elements and Lighting Layouts on Prospective Occupants’ Perceptions of Amenity and Efficiency in Living Rooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-30, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Monteiro & Ana Clara Carrilho & Nuno Sousa & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2023. "Do We Live Where It Is Pleasant? Correlates of Perceived Pleasantness with Socioeconomic Variables," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Chaogui Kang & Dongwan Fan & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Validating activity, time, and space diversity as essential components of urban vitality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1180-1197, June.
    3. Junhee Kang & Keeyeon Hwang & Sungjin Park, 2016. "Finding Factors that Influence Carsharing Usage: Case Study in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim & Joonho Ko, 2017. "Maximum Likelihood and Firth Logistic Regression of the Pedestrian Route Choice," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(6), pages 616-637, November.
    5. Anna Visvizi & Shahira Assem Abdel-Razek & Roman Wosiek & Radosław Malik, 2021. "Conceptualizing Walking and Walkability in the Smart City through a Model Composite w 2 Smart City Utility Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Avi Friedman, 2017. "Sustainable and Resource—Efficient Homes and Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-3, December.
    7. King Hang Lam & Wai Ming To & Peter K.C. Lee, 2022. "Smart Building Management System (SBMS) for Commercial Buildings—Key Attributes and Usage Intentions from Building Professionals’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Youngkook Kim, 2016. "Impacts of the perception of physical environments and the actual physical environments on self-rated health," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 73-87, March.
    9. Sajal Chowdhury & Masa Noguchi & Hemanta Doloi, 2021. "Conceptual Parametric Relationship for Occupants’ Domestic Environmental Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Eun Jung Kim & Jaewoong Won & Jiyeong Kim, 2019. "Is Seoul Walkable? Assessing a Walkability Score and Examining Its Relationship with Pedestrian Satisfaction in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7885-:d:850565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.