IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7820-d848835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Urban Residents Perceive Nature Education: A Survey from Eight Metropolises in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Huang

    (Institute of International and Comparative Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Rui Shi

    (School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Jin Zhou

    (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Zhiqiang Chen

    (China Nature Education Network, Guangzhou 510000, China)

  • Peng Liang

    (School of Economy, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

“Nature education” has become a striking trend in the field of environmental and sustainable development education in mainland China in recent years, which is considered to be a powerful force to realize the 11th goal of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, namely, “Sustainable Cities and Communities”. Chinese urban residents’ perceptions of “nature education” are fundamental to the success of “nature education” but we still know very little about it. This study aims to gather insights on the awareness, attitudes, and behaviors towards nature and nature education. In this paper, online questionnaires and random sampling methods were used. An online questionnaire survey was conducted among urban residents in eight representative cities in China, namely, Beijing ( n = 313), Shanghai ( n = 314), Guangzhou ( n = 307), Shenzhen ( n = 308), Chengdu ( n = 206), Xiamen ( n = 207), Hangzhou ( n = 203), and Wuhan ( n = 206). This study implied that Chinese urban residents are willing to accept nature education. There is a strong sense among the Chinese public in cities that living in harmony with nature, improving wellbeing through healthy and sustainable actions, and enjoying and protecting nature are desirable actions. However, respondents were slightly less likely to consider the emotional benefits and the development of social and functional (technical) skills as important elements of participating in nature education. The results also confirm that Chinese urban residents’ perceptions of nature education can be positively predicted by the individual’s relationship with nature and the individual’s experience related to nature education. These are important key messages for nature education organizations to communicate. The results of the study put forward some questions worthy of in-depth consideration for the development of China’s nature education, which can provide a foundation and direction for the further development of nature education in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Huang & Rui Shi & Jin Zhou & Zhiqiang Chen & Peng Liang, 2022. "How Urban Residents Perceive Nature Education: A Survey from Eight Metropolises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7820-:d:848835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florence Allard-Poesi & Lorena B.S. Matos & Justine Massu, 2022. "Not all types of nature have an equal effect on urban residents’ well-being: A structural equation model approach," Post-Print hal-03599664, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuzhuo Cai & Lili-Ann Wolff, 2022. "Education and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-5, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianwei Huang & Mei-Po Kwan & Lap Ah Tse & Sylvia Y. He, 2023. "How People’s COVID-19 Induced-Worries and Multiple Environmental Exposures Are Associated with Their Depression, Anxiety, and Stress during the Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7820-:d:848835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.