IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7721-d847387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transportation Network Optimization Model for Livestock Manure under Different Terrains Considering Economic and Environmental Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Deng

    (School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
    Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430208, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Taoyu Chen

    (School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhenyu Pu

    (Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430208, China)

  • Xia Peng

    (Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430208, China)

  • Xiner Qin

    (Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430208, China)

  • Xiaomei Zhan

    (School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jianghui Wen

    (School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Optimizing the path of livestock manure used for farmland is a hugely significant issue, which not only improves the utilization efficiency of manure but also reduces the cost of the transportation of manure. However, some factors such as different terrains and the density of surrounding farmland may lead to more difficulty in further improving the resource utilization rate. Therefore, this paper aims to establish a transport network optimization model for a complex livestock manure distribution scheme. Using basic information from livestock and poultry farms, cultivated land, water areas and forestland in Xinzhou District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province, the relationship between farmland and livestock farms is divided into farm-intensive and water-intensive farmland areas by using the Voronoi diagram subdivision method. Then, according to the supply–demand balance of manure and crop demand, an optimization model is proposed to discuss the manure return scheme for these two types of terrain. The results show that our model can help significantly improve manure utilization efficiency under different terrain situations, which is proposed comprehensively, considering the economic and environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Deng & Taoyu Chen & Zhenyu Pu & Xia Peng & Xiner Qin & Xiaomei Zhan & Jianghui Wen, 2022. "A Transportation Network Optimization Model for Livestock Manure under Different Terrains Considering Economic and Environmental Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7721-:d:847387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7721/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7721/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keplinger, Keith O. & Hauck, Larry M., 2006. "The Economics of Manure Utilization: Model and Application," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Gupta, Pankaj & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar & Aggarwal, Usha & Charles, V., 2021. "An integrated AHP-DEA multi-objective optimization model for sustainable transportation in mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Stasiv, Oleh & Kachmar, Oksana & Vavrynovych, Oksana & Arabska, Ekaterina, 2021. "Ecological and economic efficiency of growing maize for grain in short-rotation cultivation of the Western region," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(2), June.
    4. Khalep, Yurii & Moskalenko, Anatolii & Shapovaliuk, Mykola & Arabska, Ekaterina, 2021. "Ecological and economical value of green manuring for Polissia organic agrocenoses," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(1), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng Gong & Jason.S. Bergtold & Elizabeth Yeager, 2021. "Assessing the joint adoption and complementarity between in-field conservation practices of Kansas farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Li, Lu & Zhou, Yan & Li, Mo & Cao, Kaihua & Tao, Yanhuai & Liu, Yangdachuan, 2022. "Integrated modelling for cropping pattern optimization and planning considering the synergy of water resources-society-economy-ecology-environment system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed, 2023. "Application of fuzzy group decision-making selecting green supplier: a case study of the manufacture of natural laurel soap," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Michael Friedrich Tröster, 2023. "Assessing the Value of Organic Fertilizers from the Perspective of EU Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Osaki, Mauro & Batalha, Mário Otavio, 2014. "Optimization model of agricultural production system in grain farms under risk, in Sorriso, Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-188.
    6. Laroche Dupraz, C. & Postolle, A., 2013. "Food sovereignty and agricultural trade policy commitments: How much leeway do West African nations have?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 115-125.
    7. Zhiqiang Zhu & Xuechi Zhang & Mengqing Xue & Yaoyao Song, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Evolutionary Change under Regulatory Constraints: A Case Study of Chinese Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Carl Gaigné & Julie Le Gallo & Solène Larue & Bertrand Schmitt, 2012. "Does Regulation of Manure Land Application Work Against Agglomeration Economies? Theory and Evidence from the French Hog Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 116-132.
    9. Massey, Raymond E. & Gedikoglu, Haluk, 2021. "Manure application rules and environmental considerations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Elanor Starmer & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Living High on the Hog: Factory Farms, Federal Policy, and the Structural Transformation of Swine Production," GDAE Working Papers 07-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    11. Ottone Scammacca & Rasool Mehdizadeh & Yann Gunzburger, 2022. "Territorial Mining Scenarios for Sustainable Land-Planning: A Risk-Based Comparison on the Example of Gold Mining in French Guiana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Yana Vodiak & Yurii Tsapko & Anatolii Kucher & Vitaliy Krupin & Iryna Skorokhod, 2022. "Influence of Growing Miscanthus x giganteus on Ecosystem Services of Chernozem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    13. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2017. "Nutrient Pollution: A Wicked Challenge for Economic Instruments," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-39, April.
    14. Li, Jiangong & Akdeniz, Neslihan & Kim, Harrison Hyung Min & Gates, Richard S. & Wang, Xinlei & Wang, Kaiying, 2021. "Quantification of sustainable animal manure utilization strategies in Hangzhou, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Elżbieta Jasińska & Michał Jasiński, 2022. "Mining Industry Corporate Social Responsibility to Education Development," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Diego Díaz-Vázquez & Susan Caroline Alvarado-Cummings & Demetrio Meza-Rodríguez & Carolina Senés-Guerrero & José de Anda & Misael Sebastián Gradilla-Hernández, 2020. "Evaluation of Biogas Potential from Livestock Manures and Multicriteria Site Selection for Centralized Anaerobic Digester Systems: The Case of Jalisco, México," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-32, April.
    17. Dibrova, Anatolii & Dibrova, Larysa & Chmil, Alla & Dibrova, Maksym & Нuz, Mykhailo, 2022. "Modeling the impact of mineral fertilizer costs on effectiveness of production and export corn from Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
    18. Moskalenko, Anatolii & Ivanov, Dmytro & Shyian, Nataliia & Khalep, Yurii, 2023. "Environmental features of land use formation in the regions of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    19. Hala Hmamed & Asmaa Benghabrit & Anass Cherrafi & Nadia Hamani, 2023. "Achieving a Sustainable Transportation System via Economic, Environmental, and Social Optimization: A Comprehensive AHP-DEA Approach from the Waste Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Van der Straeten, Bart & Buysse, Jeroen & Nolte, Stephan & Lauwers, Ludwig H. & Claeys, Dakerlia & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2011. "Policy intervention in a concentration permit market: efficiency analysis of obligatory manure processing in Flanders," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114832, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7721-:d:847387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.