IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7379-d840473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of Responsible Research and Innovation in Citizen Observatories

Author

Listed:
  • Michael O’Grady

    (School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland)

  • Eleni Mangina

    (School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland)

Abstract

An ethos of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has been promoted in the last decade, especially within European research. The broad objective is to ensure that research and innovation activities align with society’s needs and expectations. In parallel, citizen observatories seek to mainstream citizen science as a valid paradigm for scientific investigation but additionally as a model for increasing societal participation in local democracy and policy definition. This paper explores how precepts of RRI have permeated research in citizen observatories. The methodology adopted is that of a scoping review. Results confirm a relatively simple adoption of RRI principles. However, the adoption is uneven and shallow, perhaps reflecting the ongoing evolution of both RRI and the citizen observatory model. It is recommended that the diverse actors charged with the definition, design, validation, and deployment of citizen observatories unambiguously integrate, promote, and report on how the RRI principles are reflected in their activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael O’Grady & Eleni Mangina, 2022. "Adoption of Responsible Research and Innovation in Citizen Observatories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7379-:d:840473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7379/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7379/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wehn, Uta & Evers, Jaap, 2015. "The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observatories to increase eParticipation in local flood risk management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 187-198.
    2. Raquel Ajates & Gerid Hager & Pavlos Georgiadis & Saskia Coulson & Mel Woods & Drew Hemment, 2020. "Local Action with Global Impact: The Case of the GROW Observatory and the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    4. Filipe Montargil & Vitor Santos, 2017. "Citizen Observatories: Concept, Opportunities and Communication with Citizens in the First EU Experiences," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Alois A. Paulin & Leonidas G. Anthopoulos & Christopher G. Reddick (ed.), Beyond Bureaucracy, pages 167-184, Springer.
    5. Niels Mejlgaard & Carter Bloch & Emil Bargmann Madsen, 2019. "Responsible research and innovation in Europe: A cross-country comparative analysis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 198-209.
    6. Cara Tannenbaum & Robert P. Ellis & Friederike Eyssel & James Zou & Londa Schiebinger, 2019. "Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 137-146, November.
    7. Ana Delgado & Heidrun Åm, 2018. "Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-8, March.
    8. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold, 2016. "Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 126-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiqing Liu & Gui Zhang & Xiaojing Lv & Jiayu Li, 2022. "Discovering the Landscape and Evolution of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): Science Mapping Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Regina Grazuleviciene & Sandra Andrusaityte & Aurimas Rapalavicius, 2021. "Measuring the Outcomes of a Participatory Research Study: Findings from an Environmental Epidemiological Study in Kaunas City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Aihua Zhu & Samah Ali Mohsen Mofreh & Sultan Salem, 2023. "The Application of Language Proficiency Scales in Education Context: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    4. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la techno," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    5. Qi Mu & Fabrizio Aimar, 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Ivan Ligardo-Herrera & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Edurne A. Inigo & Vincent Blok, 2018. "Addressing Climate Change in Responsible Research and Innovation: Recommendations for Its Operationalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Rui Liang & Xichuan Zheng & Po-Hsun Wang & Jia Liang & Linhui Hu, 2023. "Research Progress of Carbon-Neutral Design for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-50, August.
    8. Bertha Leticia Treviño-Elizondo & Heriberto García-Reyes & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García, 2023. "A Maturity Model to Become a Smart Organization Based on Lean and Industry 4.0 Synergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Zoltán Krajcsák, 2021. "Researcher Performance in Scopus Articles ( RPSA ) as a New Scientometric Model of Scientific Output: Tested in Business Area of V4 Countries," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Daniel Caballero-Julia & Philippe Campillo, 2021. "Epistemological Considerations of Text Mining: Implications for Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-26, August.
    11. Zaheer Allam & Ayyoob Sharifi & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    12. Raúl Antonio Díaz Pacheco & Ernest Benedito, 2024. "Analysis of Supply Chain Response Frameworks: A Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Lin Zhang & Beibei Sun & Fei Shu & Ying Huang, 2022. "Comparing paper level classifications across different methods and systems: an investigation of Nature publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7633-7651, December.
    14. Dionisios Koutsantonis & Konstantinos Koutsantonis & Nikolaos P. Bakas & Vagelis Plevris & Andreas Langousis & Savvas A. Chatzichristofis, 2022. "Bibliometric Literature Review of Adaptive Learning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Ewa Hącia & Natalia Wagner & Aleksandra Łapko, 2022. "The Importance of City Logistics for Urban Tourism Development: Searching for a New Research Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. C. Z. Kalenga & J. Parsons Leigh & J. Griffith & D. C. Wolf & S. M. Dumanski & A. Desjarlais & L. Petermann & S. B. Ahmed, 2020. "Sex and gender considerations in health research: a trainee and allied research personnel perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Certomà, Chiara & Corsini, Filippo & Frey, Marco, 2020. "Hyperconnected, receptive and do-it-yourself city. An investigation into the European “imaginary” of crowdsourcing for urban governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    18. Nash Jett D. G. Reyes & Franz Kevin F. Geronimo & Heidi B. Guerra & Lee-Hyung Kim, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review of Stormwater Treatment Wetlands: Global Research Trends and Existing Knowledge Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Christopher Meyer & Laima Gerlitz & Monika Klein, 2022. "Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard & Calleja, Carlos José & Drukarch, Hadassah & Torricelli, Diego, 2023. "How can ISO 13482:2014 account for the ethical and social considerations of robotic exoskeletons?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7379-:d:840473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.