IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6707-d828379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Balanced Allocation of Medical and Health Resources in Urban Areas of China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Nanjing

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Wu

    (School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China)

  • Wei Chen

    (School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China)

  • Lingling Lin

    (School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China)

  • Xu Ren

    (School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China)

  • Yingna Qu

    (School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China)

Abstract

The balanced allocation of medical and health resources is an important basis for the sustainable development of health undertakings. In recent years, China has made remarkable achievements in the medical and health services, but there is still a phenomenon of unbalanced allocation of medical and health resources among different regions, which has become an urgent problem to be solved in deepening the reform of the medical and health system during the 14th Five-Year Plan period. From the perspective of people’s needs for health, this study analyzed the equity and efficiency of urban medical and health resources allocation in China by using the Theil index method and DEA method. Meanwhile, the authors used the coupling coordination degree model to construct a balanced development model with equity and efficiency as subsystems, taking the city of Nanjing as an example to analyze its balanced allocation of medical and health resources from 2008 to 2019. In general, taking Nanjing as an example, it shows that the balanced allocation of medical and health resources in Chinese cities is good, but in geographical dimension, the level of balanced allocation is low, and there are still significant differences in the equity and efficiency of allocation among regions. In the future, the government can strengthen the rationality of regional planning, appropriately increasing health investment and medical supply, considering both equity and efficiency to further realize the balanced allocation of medical and health resources and improve the sustainability of urban medical service system. The main contribution of this paper lies in that, from the perspective of sustainable development, the evaluation system is integrated to measure the equity and efficiency respectively, and the balanced development model is used to investigate the allocation of urban medical and health resources. The research results can provide reference for optimizing resources allocation and promoting the sustainable development of medical and health undertakings.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Wu & Wei Chen & Lingling Lin & Xu Ren & Yingna Qu, 2022. "The Balanced Allocation of Medical and Health Resources in Urban Areas of China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6707-:d:828379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horev, Tuvia & Pesis-Katz, Irena & Mukamel, Dana B., 2004. "Trends in geographic disparities in allocation of health care resources in the US," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 223-232, May.
    2. Shorrocks, A F, 1980. "The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(3), pages 613-625, April.
    3. Anthony J. Culyer, 2006. "The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(11), pages 1155-1158, November.
    4. Thomas Czypionka & Markus Kraus & Susanne Mayer & Gerald Röhrling, 2014. "Efficiency, ownership, and financing of hospitals: The case of Austria," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 331-347, December.
    5. Yi Tao & Kizito Henry & Qinpei Zou & Xiaoni Zhong, 2014. "Methods for measuring horizontal equity in health resource allocation: a comparative study," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Rabiatul Munirah Alpandi & Fakarudin Kamarudin & Peter Wanke & Muhammad Syafiq Muhammad Salam & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain, 2022. "Energy Efficiency in Production of Swiftlet Edible Bird’s Nest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Reckers-Droog, V.T. & van Exel, N.J.A. & Brouwer, W.B.F., 2018. "Looking back and moving forward: On the application of proportional shortfall in healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 621-629.
    8. Maynard, Alan, 1999. "Rationing health care: an exploration," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1-2), pages 5-11, September.
    9. Xinyu Zhang & Lin Zhao & Zhuang Cui & Yaogang Wang, 2015. "Study on Equity and Efficiency of Health Resources and Services Based on Key Indicators in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Silvia González-de-Julián & Isabel Barrachina-Martínez & David Vivas-Consuelo & Álvaro Bonet-Pla & Ruth Usó-Talamantes, 2021. "Data Envelopment Analysis Applications on Primary Health Care Using Exogenous Variables and Health Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Jiang, Shan & Gu, Yuanyuan & Yang, Fan & Wu, Tao & Wang, Hui & Cutler, Henry & Zhang, Lufa, 2020. "Tertiary hospitals or community clinics? An enquiry into the factors affecting patients' choice for healthcare facilities in urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Retzlaff-Roberts, Donna & Chang, Cyril F. & Rubin, Rose M., 2004. "Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 55-72, July.
    13. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    14. Volkan Recai Cetin & Serdal Bahce, 2016. "Measuring the efficiency of health systems of OECD countries by data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(37), pages 3497-3507, August.
    15. Margherita Neri & Patricia Cubi-Molla & Graham Cookson, 2022. "Approaches to Measure Efficiency in Primary Care: A Systematic Literature Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 19-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meijun Hu & Lei Wang & Wei Wang & Lingyun Tong & Yuqin Lin, 2022. "Study on the Sustainable Development Factors of Agriculture-Oriented Characteristic Towns in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Wei, Zhongyu & Bai, Jianjun & Feng, Ruitao, 2023. "Optimization referral rate design for hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system based on accessibility-utilization efficiency bi-objective collaboration: A case study of China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Puertas, Rosa & Marti, Luisa & Guaita-Martinez, José M., 2020. "Innovation, lifestyle, policy and socioeconomic factors: An analysis of European quality of life," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Angelo Castaldo & Maria Alessandra Antonelli & Valeria De Bonis & Giorgia Marini, 2020. "Determinants of health sector efficiency: evidence from a two-step analysis on 30 OECD countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(2), pages 1651-1666.
    3. Ülengin, Füsun & Kabak, Özgür & Önsel, Sule & Aktas, Emel & Parker, Barnett R., 2011. "The competitiveness of nations and implications for human development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-27, March.
    4. Rize Jing & Tingting Xu & Xiaozhen Lai & Elham Mahmoudi & Hai Fang, 2019. "Technical Efficiency of Public and Private Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Philip Odewole Olawale, 2020. "Adequacy of DEA in Measuring the Efficiency of Public Sector Entities in Nigeria: A Comparative Analysis Approach," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(5), pages 13-22.
    6. Ricardo Ocaña-Riola & Carmen Pérez-Romero & Mª Isabel Ortega-Díaz & José Jesús Martín-Martín, 2021. "Multilevel Zero-One Inflated Beta Regression Model for the Analysis of the Relationship between Exogenous Health Variables and Technical Efficiency in the Spanish National Health System Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Cheng, Gang & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D., 2014. "Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A cross-country comparison using the directional distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 899-910.
    8. Cristian Barra & Raffaele Lagravinese & Roberto Zotti, 2022. "Exploring hospital efficiency within and between Italian regions: new empirical evidence," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 269-284, June.
    9. Sharon Hadad & Yossi Hadad & Tzahit Simon-Tuval, 2013. "Determinants of healthcare system’s efficiency in OECD countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(2), pages 253-265, April.
    10. António Afonso & Miguel St. Aubyn, 2006. "Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: a DEA Approach with Non-discretionary Inputs," Working Papers Department of Economics 2006/33, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    11. Fang Wu & Mingyao Gu & Chenming Zhu & Yingna Qu, 2023. "Temporal-Spatial Evolution and Trend Prediction of the Supply Efficiency of Primary Medical Health Service—An Empirical Study Based on Central and Western Regions of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Berger, Michael & Sommersguter-Reichmann, Margit & Czypionka, Thomas, 2020. "Determinants of soft budget constraints: how public debt affects hospital performance in Austria," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116865, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Hu, Hsin-Hui & Qi, Qinghui & Yang, Chih-Hai, 2012. "Analysis of hospital technical efficiency in China: Effect of health insurance reform," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 865-877.
    14. Kontodimopoulos, Nick & Nanos, Panagiotis & Niakas, Dimitris, 2006. "Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in Greece," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 49-57, March.
    15. Asmild, Mette & Pastor, Jesús T., 2010. "Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 475-483, December.
    16. Bin Zhu & Chih-Wei Hsieh & Yue Zhang, 2018. "Incorporating Spatial Statistics into Examining Equity in Health Workforce Distribution: An Empirical Analysis in the Chinese Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, June.
    17. De Nicola, Arianna & Gitto, Simone & Mancuso, Paolo, 2011. "A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the efficiency of the Italian health system," MPRA Paper 39126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Alvaro Almeida, 2024. "The trade-off between health system resiliency and efficiency: evidence from COVID-19 in European regions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 31-47, February.
    19. Sepideh Abolghasem & Mehdi Toloo & Santiago Amézquita, 2019. "Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 512-533, September.
    20. Castro Lobo, M.S. & Estellita Lins, M.P. & Menegolla, I.A., 2014. "A new approach to assess the performance of the Brazilian National Immunization Program (NIP)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 49-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6707-:d:828379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.