IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6692-d827896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of Using Coal Ash for the Production of Sustainable Bricks

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Mukhtar

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Asad Ullah Qazi

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Qasim Shaukat Khan

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Junaid Munir

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, 376-392 Swanston St., Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, 376-392 Swanston St., Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Asif Hameed

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

Abstract

In this research study, environmentally friendly unburnt coal ash (CA) bricks were investigated as an alternative to conventional burnt clay bricks. In this research study, various physical and mechanical properties of unburnt CA bricks were investigated. The unburnt CA bricks were prepared by using 60% CA and 10% lime by weight. In these unburnt CA bricks, varying cement contents (5%, 10%, and 15%), sand contents (10% and 15%), and quarry dust contents (5% and 10%) by weight were used. A forming pressure of 29 MPa was applied through an automatic pressure control system either for 3 s or 6 s. The prepared bricks were moist cured for 28 days. The experimental results exhibited that unburnt CA bricks with 10% cement, 10% sand, and 10% quarry dust subjected to forming pressure for 3 s exhibited the highest compressive strength of 19 MPa and flexural strength of 2.1 MPa. The unburnt CA bricks exhibited reduced water absorption, reduced efflorescence, and lower weight per unit area than the conventional clay bricks. A cost comparison of unburnt CA bricks and clay bricks exhibited that unburnt CA bricks are cost-effective compared to clay bricks.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Mukhtar & Asad Ullah Qazi & Qasim Shaukat Khan & Muhammad Junaid Munir & Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi & Asif Hameed, 2022. "Feasibility of Using Coal Ash for the Production of Sustainable Bricks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6692-:d:827896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amanda Qinisile Vilakazi & Sehliselo Ndlovu & Liberty Chipise & Alan Shemi, 2022. "The Recycling of Coal Fly Ash: A Review on Sustainable Developments and Economic Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zdzisław Adamczyk & Joanna Komorek & Magdalena Kokowska-Pawłowska & Jacek Nowak, 2023. "Distribution of Rare-Earth Elements in Ashes Produced in the Coal Combustion Process from Power Boilers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Aziman, Eli Syafiqah & Ismail, Aznan Fazli & Rahmat, Muhammad Abdullah, 2023. "Balancing economic growth and environmental protection: A sustainable approach to Malaysia's rare-earth industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Isaac Akinwumi & Manuela Onyeiwu & Promise Epelle & Victor Ajayi, 2023. "Soil Improvement Using Blends of Coal Ash and Plantain Peel Ash as Road Pavement Layer Materials," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Ewa Strzałkowska, 2023. "Ashes Qualified as a Source of Selected Critical Elements (REY, Co, Ga, V)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6692-:d:827896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.