IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6612-d826468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis into Machine Learning Models for Streamflow Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Yajie Wu

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yuan Chen

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yong Tian

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models have been widely used to predict streamflow. However, limited by the high dimensionality and training difficulty, high-resolution gridded climate datasets have rarely been used to build ML-based streamflow models. In this study, we developed a general modeling framework that applied empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis to extract information from gridded climate datasets for building ML-based streamflow prediction models. Four classic ML methods, namely, support vector regression (SVR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM) and gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT), were incorporated into the modeling framework for performance evaluation and comparison. We applied the modeling framework to the upper Heihe River Basin (UHRB) to simulate a historical 22-year period of daily streamflow. The modeling results demonstrated that EOF analysis could extract the spatial information from the gridded climate datasets for streamflow prediction. All four selected ML models captured the temporal variations in the streamflow and reproduced the daily hydrographs. In particular, the GBRT model outperformed the other three models in terms of streamflow prediction accuracy in the testing period. The R 2 , RMSE, MAE, NSE and PBIAS were equal to 0.68, 9.40 m 3 /s, 5.18 m 3 /s, 0.68 and −0.03 for the daily streamflow in the Taolai River Watershed of the UHRB, respectively. Additionally, the LSTM method could provide physically based hydrological explanations of climate predicators in streamflow generation. Therefore, this study demonstrated the unique capability and functionality of incorporating EOF analysis into ML models for streamflow prediction, which could make better use of the readily available gridded climate data in hydrological simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yajie Wu & Yuan Chen & Yong Tian, 2022. "Incorporating Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis into Machine Learning Models for Streamflow Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6612-:d:826468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shivshanker Patel & Parthasarathy Ramachandran, 2015. "A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Modeling River Flow Time Series: The Case of Upper Cauvery River Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(2), pages 589-602, January.
    2. Peiman Parisouj & Hamid Mohebzadeh & Taesam Lee, 2020. "Employing Machine Learning Algorithms for Streamflow Prediction: A Case Study of Four River Basins with Different Climatic Zones in the United States," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4113-4131, October.
    3. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Guerrero, Josep M., 2019. "Hybrid machine intelligent SVR variants for wind forecasting and ramp events," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 369-379.
    4. Rajib Bhattacharjya & Sandeep Chaurasia, 2013. "Geomorphology Based Semi-Distributed Approach for Modelling Rainfall-Runoff Process," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 567-579, January.
    5. Blankenau, Philip A. & Kilic, Ayse & Allen, Richard, 2020. "An evaluation of gridded weather data sets for the purpose of estimating reference evapotranspiration in the United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yitong & Hao, Zengchao & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Agricultural risk assessment of compound dry and hot events in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Isabel Kaufmann Almeida & Aleska Kaufmann Almeida & Jorge Luiz Steffen & Teodorico Alves Sobrinho, 2016. "Model for Estimating the Time of Concentration in Watersheds," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4083-4096, September.
    3. Robyn Horan & Pawan S. Wable & Veena Srinivasan & Helen E. Baron & Virginie J. D. Keller & Kaushal K. Garg & Nathan Rickards & Mike Simpson & Helen A. Houghton-Carr & H. Gwyn Rees, 2021. "Modelling Small-Scale Storage Interventions in Semi-Arid India at the Basin Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Wang, Xiaodi & Hao, Yan & Yang, Wendong, 2024. "Novel wind power ensemble forecasting system based on mixed-frequency modeling and interpretable base model selection strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    5. Lee, Yoonjae & Ha, Byeongmin & Hwangbo, Soonho, 2022. "Generative model-based hybrid forecasting model for renewable electricity supply using long short-term memory networks: A case study of South Korea's energy transition policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 69-87.
    6. Lu, Hongfang & Ma, Xin & Huang, Kun & Azimi, Mohammadamin, 2020. "Prediction of offshore wind farm power using a novel two-stage model combining kernel-based nonlinear extension of the Arps decline model with a multi-objective grey wolf optimizer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Junwei Fu & Yuna Ni & Yuming Ma & Jian Zhao & Qiuyi Yang & Shiyi Xu & Xiang Zhang & Yuhua Liu, 2023. "A Visualization-Based Ramp Event Detection Model for Wind Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Yuri B. Kirsta & Ol’ga V. Lovtskaya, 2021. "Good-quality Long-term Forecast of Spring-summer Flood Runoff for Mountain Rivers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 811-825, February.
    9. Wenxin Xu & Jie Chen & Xunchang J. Zhang, 2022. "Scale Effects of the Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using a State-of-the-art Deep Learning Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(10), pages 3609-3625, August.
    10. Cécile Couharde & Rémi Generoso, 2023. "The financial cost of stabilizing US farm income under climate change," Working Papers hal-04159823, HAL.
    11. Zhuoqi Wang & Yuan Si & Haibo Chu, 2022. "Daily Streamflow Prediction and Uncertainty Using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network Coupled with Bootstrap," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4575-4590, September.
    12. Allen, Richard G. & Dhungel, Ramesh & Dhungana, Bibha & Huntington, Justin & Kilic, Ayse & Morton, Charles, 2021. "Conditioning point and gridded weather data under aridity conditions for calculation of reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Rana Muhammad Adnan Ikram & Leonardo Goliatt & Ozgur Kisi & Slavisa Trajkovic & Shamsuddin Shahid, 2022. "Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy for Improving Machine Learning Approaches in Streamflow Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-30, August.
    14. Hakan Tongal & Martijn J. Booij, 2016. "A Comparison of Nonlinear Stochastic Self-Exciting Threshold Autoregressive and Chaotic k-Nearest Neighbour Models in Daily Streamflow Forecasting," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1515-1531, March.
    15. Jabeur, Sami Ben & Ballouk, Houssein & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Omri, Anis, 2022. "Forecasting the macrolevel determinants of entrepreneurial opportunities using artificial intelligence models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Yingjie Zhu & Jiageng Ma & Fangqing Gu & Jie Wang & Zhijuan Li & Youyao Zhang & Jiani Xu & Yifan Li & Yiwen Wang & Xiangqun Yang, 2023. "Price Prediction of Bitcoin Based on Adaptive Feature Selection and Model Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Henrik Zsiborács & Gábor Pintér & András Vincze & Nóra Hegedűsné Baranyai, 2022. "Wind Power Generation Scheduling Accuracy in Europe: An Overview of ENTSO-E Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-58, December.
    18. Marania Hopuare & Tao Manni & Victoire Laurent & Keitapu Maamaatuaiahutapu, 2022. "Investigating Wind Energy Potential in Tahiti, French Polynesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Jincheng Zhou & Dan Wang & Shahab S. Band & Changhyun Jun & Sayed M. Bateni & M. Moslehpour & Hao-Ting Pai & Chung-Chian Hsu & Rasoul Ameri, 2023. "Monthly River Discharge Forecasting Using Hybrid Models Based on Extreme Gradient Boosting Coupled with Wavelet Theory and Lévy–Jaya Optimization Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(10), pages 3953-3972, August.
    20. Jinlin Li & Lanhui Zhang, 2021. "Comparison of Four Methods for Vertical Extrapolation of Soil Moisture Contents from Surface to Deep Layers in an Alpine Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6612-:d:826468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.