IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6561-d825603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Assessment of Curriculum Content of Group Games in Physical Education: A Systematic Literature Review of the Last Seven Years

Author

Listed:
  • Sherzad Saber Mohammed

    (Department of Science Education, Near East University, Nicosia 2087, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey)

  • Engin Baysen

    (Department of Science Education, Near East University, Nicosia 2087, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey)

Abstract

The study aims to systematically review the literature on the curriculum content of group games in physical education (PE) in northern Iraq. Overall, eight studies published between 2015 and 2021 were analysed on major research objectives, methodologies, and outcomes, guided by two research questions: ‘What were the key research objectives, methods, and outcomes of the selected studies in this systematic review?’ And ‘What are the general objectives of PE, the standards for selecting the contents of curricula, and the types of assessments used in PE?’. This study aims to provide a guide for Northern Iraqi universities on how to incorporate group games into PE based on the analysis of the related current literature. For that reason, researchers have primarily used quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches to investigate learning phenomena, with most studies indicating positive learning outcomes. Besides, most studies were conducted in the formal educational setting, revealing three general objectives of PE: psychokinetic, social-emotional, and knowledge. The standards for selecting curricula contents include validity/effectiveness, self-sufficiency, significance, interest, learnability, utility, and consistency with social realities. Moreover, three types of assessments were used in PE: cognitive assessment, summative assessment, and formative assessment. The findings shed light on the main curriculum content of PE and how group games can potentially be included in the curriculum of PE in educational settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherzad Saber Mohammed & Engin Baysen, 2022. "Peer Assessment of Curriculum Content of Group Games in Physical Education: A Systematic Literature Review of the Last Seven Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6561-:d:825603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sardar S. Shareef & Guita Farivarsadri, 2020. "An Innovative Framework for Teaching/Learning Technical Courses in Architectural Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Corina Tifrea & Antoanela Giosan & Raluca Maria Costache, 2016. "The Importance Of Physical Education And Sport In The Life Of The Students Of The Economy Colleges," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 428-434, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, 2021. "Investigating Possibilities of Developing Self-Directed Learning in Architecture Students Using Design Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Víctor Revilla-Cuesta & Marta Skaf & Milagros Navarro-González & Vanesa Ortega-López, 2021. "Reflections throughout the COVID-19 Lockdown: What Do I Need for Successful Learning of Engineering?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Shivan Khudhur Ridha & Hanife Bensen Bostanci & Mustafa Kurt, 2022. "Using Animated Videos to Enhance Vocabulary Learning at the Noble Private Technical Institute (NPTI) in Northern Iraq/Erbil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6561-:d:825603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.