IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p22-d707589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a Circular Economy in the Toy Industry: The Business Model of a Romanian Company

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Albastroiu Nastase

    (Department of Business, Consumer Sciences and Quality Management, Faculty of Business and Tourism, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Dacia Blvd., 41, District 1, RO-010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristian Negrutiu

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Dacia Blvd., 41, District 1, RO-010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Felea

    (Department of Business, Consumer Sciences and Quality Management, Faculty of Business and Tourism, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Dacia Blvd., 41, District 1, RO-010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Carmen Acatrinei

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Marketing, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Dacia Blvd., 41, District 1, RO-010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Andrei Cepoi

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Dacia Blvd., 41, District 1, RO-010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Istrate

    (Business Administration Doctoral School, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Dacia Blvd., 41, District 1, RO-010404 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Nowadays, more and more business organizations are encouraged to find ways to produce high-quality products that are offered to users for their temporary enjoyment and then redistributed or sent to the next user pending. This is done without being conditioned to believe that we need to own something, use it for certain functions for a limited amount of time, and then throw it away. Toys are a perfect candidate for this approach. Given the lack of case studies explaining how companies can design and implement a circular economy in practice, especially in the toy industry, this study aimed to develop a case study based on Evertoys, a start-up operating in Romania, which is a country where the circular economy is only in an infancy phase. This study’s objective was to analyze this business model from the circular economy perspective. Regarding the methodology, the work followed the research strategy of the case study, which was developed by analyzing the opportunities and challenges of this toy-as-a-service model and taking into consideration the components of the Business Model Canvas. Our findings indicated the presence of driving factors, as well as barriers, in the implementation of circular economy practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Albastroiu Nastase & Cristian Negrutiu & Mihai Felea & Carmen Acatrinei & Andrei Cepoi & Adrian Istrate, 2021. "Toward a Circular Economy in the Toy Industry: The Business Model of a Romanian Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:22-:d:707589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasile Alecsandru Strat & Cristian Teodor & Andreea Simona Saseanu, 2018. "The Characterization of the Romanian Circular Economy’s Potential, at County Level," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(48), pages 278-278.
    2. Horațiu Vermeșan & Alexandrina Mangău & Ancuța-Elena Tiuc, 2020. "Perspectives of Circular Economy in Romanian Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2018. "SMEs and the Circular Economy: From Policy to Difficulties Encountered During Implementation," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(48), pages 294-294.
    4. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:294 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Cristina Cauti?anu & Laura Asandului & Mioara Borza & Ciprian Turturean, 2018. "Quantitative Approach to Circular Economy in the OECD Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(48), pages 262-262.
    6. Luca Fraccascia & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Abhishek Agarwal & Erik G. Hansen, 2019. "Business models for the circular economy: Opportunities and challenges," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 430-432, February.
    7. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:278 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:262 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Codruța Cornelia Dura & Ana Maria Mihaela Iordache & Alexandru Ionescu & Claudia Isac & Teodora Odett Breaz, 2022. "Analyzing Performance in Wholesale Trade Romanian SMEs: Framing Circular Economy Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-34, May.
    2. Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe & Victor Lorin Purcarea & Consuela Madalina Gheorghe, 2023. "Antecedents of Consumer Intentions towards E-waste Recycling. A Perspective on the Toy Industry from Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 163-163, February.
    3. Oana Dobre-Baron & Alina Nițescu & Dorina Niță & Cătălin Mitran, 2022. "Romania’s Perspectives on the Transition to the Circular Economy in an EU Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Marta Negri & Alessandra Neri & Enrico Cagno & Gabriele Monfardini, 2021. "Circular Economy Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Firms: A Systematic Literature Review with Insights for Small and Medium Enterprises and New Adopters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Grigorescu Adriana & Maer Matei Monica Mihaela & Mocanu Cristina & Zamfir Ana-Maria, 2019. "Key drivers and skills need for innovative companies focused on sustainability," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 717-727, May.
    6. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Luca Fraccascia & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Abhishek Agarwal & Erik G. Hansen, 2021. "Business models for the circular economy: Empirical advances and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2741-2744, September.
    8. Simona-Roxana Ulman & Costica Mihai & Cristina Cautisanu, 2020. "Peculiarities of the Relation between Human and Environmental Wellbeing in Different Stages of National Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    9. José-Antonio Corral-Marfil & Núria Arimany-Serrat & Emma L. Hitchen & Carme Viladecans-Riera, 2021. "Recycling Technology Innovation as a Source of Competitive Advantage: The Sustainable and Circular Business Model of a Bicentennial Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-37, July.
    10. Wisdom Kanda & Martin Geissdoerfer & Olof Hjelm, 2021. "From circular business models to circular business ecosystems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2814-2829, September.
    11. Helen Toxopeus & Elisa Achterberg & Friedemann Polzin, 2021. "How can firms access bank finance for circular business model innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2773-2795, September.
    12. Elena Aurelia Botezat & Anca Otilia Dodescu & Sebastian Văduva & Silvia Liana Fotea, 2018. "An Exploration of Circular Economy Practices and Performance Among Romanian Producers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Mari-Isabella Stan, 2022. "An Analysis of the Municipal Waste Management of Romania and Bulgaria in the European Context," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 166-174, September.
    14. Zhejun Min & Sukanlaya Sawang & Robbert A. Kivits, 2021. "Proposing Circular Economy Ecosystem for Chinese SMEs: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Fernando E. Garcia-Muiña & Rocío González-Sánchez & Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Identifying the Equilibrium Point between Sustainability Goals and Circular Economy Practices in an Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Context Using Eco-Design," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Ilija Moric & Jelena Šaković Jovanović & Rajka Đoković & Sanja Peković & Đurđica Perović, 2020. "The Effect of Phases of the Adoption of the Circular Economy on Firm Performance: Evidence from 28 EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Renuka Nagpal & Daksh Rana & Nuaim Bashir Mir & Aditya Dwivedi & Deepti Mehrotra, 2024. "Predicting the future trends for circular economy," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(10), pages 4905-4922, October.
    18. Ana-Maria Zamfir & Cristina Mocanu & Adriana Grigorescu, 2018. "Resilient Entrepreneurship among European Higher Education Graduates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Purvis, Ben & Genovese, Andrea, 2023. "Better or different? A reflection on the suitability of indicator methods for a just transition to a circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    20. Sanja Arsova & Andrea Genovese & Panayiotis H. Ketikidis & Josep Pinyol Alberich & Adrian Solomon, 2021. "Implementing Regional Circular Economy Policies: A Proposed Living Constellation of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:22-:d:707589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.