Author
Listed:
- Yanhong Li
(Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, School of Resource Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330029, China
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment of Poyang Lake, Jiangxi Institute of Water Sciences, Nanchang 330029, China)
- Huifen Kuang
(Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, School of Resource Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330029, China)
- Chunhua Hu
(Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, School of Resource Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330029, China)
- Gang Ge
(Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, School of Resource Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330029, China)
Abstract
Rapid urbanization and industrialization have caused the continuous discharge of heavy metals into the soils of China’s Poyang Lake region, where they pose a major threat to human health. Yet, the spatial characteristics of these heavy metals in farmland soils and their pollution sources in this region remain unclear. This study was conducted to document the pollution caused by heavy metals in the Poyang Lake region through sampling that consisted of the collection of 215 soil samples from agricultural fields. The UNMIX model provided identification of the sources causing heavy metal pollution and source contributions to soil pollution. ArcGIS was used to study the spatial distribution of the eleven heavy metals and to validate the apportionment of pollution sources provided by the UNMIX model. Soil concentrations of heavy metals were above the local background concentrations. The average content of eight heavy metals, including Cd, Mo, Zn, Cu, Sb, W, Pb, and Ni, was approximately 1–6 times greater than natural background levels (6.91, 2.0, 1.67, 1.53, 1.23, 1.38, 1.11, and 1.24, respectively), while the average content of V, Cr, and Co was lower than natural background levels. The average contents of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb were all lower than the screening levels for unacceptable risks in agricultural land soils. The percentage of Cd content exceeded the risk screening value in all sampling sites, up to 55%, indicating that agricultural soils may significantly be affected by cadmium contamination. Five pollution sources of heavy metals were identified: natural sources, copper mine tailings, agricultural activities, atmospheric depositions, and industrial activities. The contribution rates of the pollution sources were 7%, 13%, 20%, 29%, and 31%, respectively. The spatial pattern of heavy metals was closely aligned with the outputs of the UNMIX model. The foregoing supports the utility of the UNMIX model for the identification of pollution sources of heavy metals, apportionment study, and its implementation in agricultural soils in the Poyang Lake region.
Suggested Citation
Yanhong Li & Huifen Kuang & Chunhua Hu & Gang Ge, 2021.
"Source Apportionment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils around the Poyang Lake Region Using UNMIX Model,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5272-:d:550796
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Weiwei Wang & Nan Lu & He Pan & Zirui Wang & Xu Han & Zhichao Zhu & Jiunian Guan, 2022.
"Heavy Metal Pollution and Its Prior Pollution Source Identification in Agricultural Soil: A Case Study in the Qianguo Irrigation District, Northeast China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
- Qi Li & Jinming Zhang & Wen Ge & Peng Sun & Yafen Han & Husen Qiu & Shoubiao Zhou, 2021.
"Geochemical Baseline Establishment and Source-Oriented Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Lime Concretion Black Soil from a Typical Agricultural Area,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5272-:d:550796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.