IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4439-d537023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect Mechanism of Tie Strength of Supply Networks on Risk Sharing: Based on the Empirical Data of China’s Automobile Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Ma

    (Business School of Jilin University, No. 2699 Qianjin Street, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Min Wan

    (McCoy School of Business, Texas State University, McCoy Hall #552, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA)

  • Yushen Du

    (Business School of Jilin University, No. 2699 Qianjin Street, Changchun 130012, China)

Abstract

Based on the research perspective of the cooperation risk and opportunistic risk between supply network enterprises, this article investigates the mechanism of how tie strength between manufacturers and suppliers influences risk sharing among enterprises from two dimensions of tie strength: structural strength and relational strength. In particular, we introduce how asymmetry of dependence moderates the relationship between tie strength and risk sharing. We surveyed China’s domestic auto OEMs and their first-tier suppliers in China through 260 questionnaires and used a hierarchical regression model as a research method to carry out the empirical analysis and test. We found an inverted U-shaped relationship between tie strength and risk sharing among enterprises, and asymmetry of dependence has a significant negative adjustment function on relational strength of the tie and risk-sharing relationship, while there is no significant adjustment function on the structural strength of it. Our findings suggest that keeping moderate tie strength among enterprises is conducive to achieving risk sharing. Moreover, trust and reciprocity is inhibitory regarding the adjustment effect of asymmetry of the dependence influencing relational strength and risk-sharing relationship. However, the structural strength and risk-sharing relationship are not interfered with by the adjustment function of asymmetry of dependence; that is, structural strength plays a decisive role in risk sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Ma & Min Wan & Yushen Du, 2021. "The Effect Mechanism of Tie Strength of Supply Networks on Risk Sharing: Based on the Empirical Data of China’s Automobile Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4439-:d:537023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yusoon Kim & Thomas Y. Choi, 2015. "Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious: An Expanded Buyer–Supplier Relationship Typology," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(3), pages 61-86, July.
    2. Helena Yli‐Renko & Erkko Autio & Harry J. Sapienza, 2001. "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 587-613, June.
    3. Wu, Guo-Ciang & Ding, Jyh-Hong & Chen, Ping-Shun, 2012. "The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 618-636.
    4. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Lai, Kee-hung & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2008. "Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 549-564, August.
    5. Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2008. "The influence of institutional norms and environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration in the Thai automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 400-410, October.
    6. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 1996. "Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 136-150, April.
    7. Maurizio Zollo & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Harbir Singh, 2002. "Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 701-713, December.
    8. Andrew Cox, 2007. "Transactions, power and contested exchange: towards a theory of exchange in business relationships," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 38-59.
    9. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Managing Supply Chain Risk," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-3238-8, April.
    10. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin, 1991. "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(1), pages 7-26, October.
    11. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou, 2014. "Managing contracts for fairness in buyer–supplier exchanges," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(10), pages 1508-1527, October.
    12. Arnaldo Camuffo & Andrea Furlan & Enrico Rettore, 2007. "Risk sharing in supplier relations: an agency model for the Italian air‐conditioning industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(12), pages 1257-1266, December.
    13. Bill McEvily & Alfred Marcus, 2005. "Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(11), pages 1033-1055, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayer-Haug, Katrin & Read, Stuart & Brinckmann, Jan & Dew, Nicholas & Grichnik, Dietmar, 2013. "Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1251-1273.
    2. Lascaux, Alexander, 2019. "Absorptive Capacity, Research Output Sharing, and Research Output Capture in University-Industry Partnerships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    3. Fabian Reck & Alexander Fliaster & Michael Kolloch, 2022. "How to Build a Network that Facilitates Firm‐level Innovation: An Integration of Structural and Managerial Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 998-1031, June.
    4. Pursey Heugens & Stelios Zyglidopoulos, 2008. "From social ties to embedded competencies: the case of business groups," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(4), pages 325-341, November.
    5. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    6. Kim, Yusoon & Choi, Thomas Y., 2021. "Supplier relationship strategies and outcome dualities: An empirical study of embeddedness perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Jessica Alzamora-Ruiz & María Fuentes-Fuentes & Myriam Martinez-Fiestas, 2021. "Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1917-1943, December.
    8. Devarakonda, Ramakrishna & Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Tadikonda, Harsha, 2022. "Founder social capital and value appropriation in R&D alliance agreements," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    9. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhang, Chuang & Shen, Lu, 2020. "Deterring dealer slackness: The role of supplier incentives and monitoring and the market environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 353-363.
    10. Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Arino, Africa & Mellewigt, Thomas, 2006. "Entrepreneurial alliances as contractual forms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 306-325, May.
    11. Foglia, Emanuela & Ferrario, Lucrezia & Lettieri, Emanuele & Porazzi, Emanuele & Gastaldi, Luca, 2019. "What drives hospital wards’ ambidexterity: Insights on the determinants of exploration and exploitation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1298-1307.
    12. Ali Shamsollahi & Danielle A. Chmielewski-Raimondo & Simon J. Bell & Reza Kachouie, 2021. "Buyer–supplier relationship dynamics: a systematic review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 418-436, March.
    13. Matthieu Mandard, 2012. "The influence of interorganizational networks on interfirm partnerships [L'influence des réseaux inter-organisationnels sur les partenariats d'entreprises]," Post-Print halshs-00716322, HAL.
    14. Yi-Ying Chang & Paul Hughes & Ian Hodgkinson & Che-Yuan Chang & Yi-Tai Seih, 2022. "The antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship: multilevel, multisource evidence," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 355-390, February.
    15. Wu, Tienhua & Jim Wu, Yen-Chun & Chen, Yenming J. & Goh, Mark, 2014. "Aligning supply chain strategy with corporate environmental strategy: A contingency approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 220-229.
    16. O'Dwyer, Michele & Gilmore, Audrey, 2018. "Value and alliance capability and the formation of strategic alliances in SMEs: The impact of customer orientation and resource optimisation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 58-68.
    17. Nguyen, Long Thanh & An, Jake & Ngo, Liem Viet & Hau, Le Nguyen, 2020. "Transforming social capital into performance via entrepreneurial orientation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 209-217.
    18. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien, 2013. "The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 48-62.
    19. Joanita Kataike & Xavier Gellynck, 2018. "22 Years of Governance Structures and Performance: What Has Been Achieved in Agrifood Chains and Beyond? A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, March.
    20. Walter, Sascha & Heinrichs, Simon & Walter, Achim, 2013. "Hostile Parent Firms and Child Firm Performance," EconStor Preprints 68592, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4439-:d:537023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.